A bored housewife spends the day at home while her husband is away on business. In a series of mundane meetings with her friends and neighbours she considers her and her husband Tom's struggle to have a child.
Catherine, (`Catch') is competent pianist whose life is principally defined by her not being very `talented'. She and her husband, a successful human rights lawyer, have recently moved to a village in the home counties. Catherine has no job or career and passes her days in some idleness why she and her husband `try for a baby'.
Catch recalls her meeting on arrival in the village with the local vicar. She receives a call from a neighbour who she met through the vicar. The neighbour, Mrs Mountjoy, believes Catherine to be an artist and intellectual and asks her to speak to her daughter, Angelica, about her choices for University. During this conversation Angelica destroys her Art `A' level course work. On her way back home Catch encounters Graeme, a much older man, her neighbour, her only friend in the village, and a retired military man. He overtly flirts with her and makes her uncomfortable. On her return to her cottage, Mrs Mountjoy turns up and they have a conversation about the joys and horrors of motherhood which ends unpleasantly for both of them. When Mrs Mountjoy leaves, Graeme arrives, having injured himself whilst clipping his hedge. As she tends to his wound Graeme, who is slightly drunk, tries and fails to heighten the sexual tension between them...
Almost all of the `action' of CATCH takes place within Catherine's head. The narrative is a stream of her opinions and memories interspersed by a few conversations. It is a novel (if it really is a novel) which consists principally of theme and style, with little or no plot or action. It is highly reminiscent of Bellow's
Seize the Day, but with much less marrow in the bone. It is also slightly reminiscent of the early work of A.S.Byatt: a book which is a little `afraid of itself'.
I have no idea whether I liked this work or not. There are some very strong aspects to it and some very weak ones too. Robson is a very skilled writer, but is perhaps a little too obsessed by his own writing talent rather than having a genuine interest in his characters or readers. Every page has some stand-out sentences which are a joy behold, but likewise every page has a few real clunkers, horribly over-stuffed with vocabulary and egoism. CATCH is a work of considerable authorial vanity.
Catherine is a reasonably intelligent and thoughtful person but she is not very interesting, nor exceptional nor stimulating. She does not have especially useful or insightful ideas. Her world is simply not interesting enough to engage me. I want to read an extraordinary novel about ordinariness, not an ordinary one. One has the feeling that Robson feels insecure that if he allows his material and characters to become gripping or fascinating then the reader may be distracted from the banquet of style and sentiment that he has laid before them. Egoism.
There are very few good novels in a female voice written by men. Notable failures in the field have come from William Boyd, Ian Banks and Ian McEwan. Robson does it very well: but again, that `trick' is not enough reason to read the book. He has the voice, no doubt about it, but does he anything to say?
I found most of the stuff going on inside Catherine's head unedifying. I skimmed quite large portions which consisted of nothing more than her internal musing. Never at any stage does Catherine produce a single thought which I consider `interesting'. I suppose Robson's point may well be that if all this mundane stuff is appropriately marshalled it will take on some kind of critical mass and become interesting. It honestly doesn't. The conversations with other characters are invariably more interesting than her internal monologue, but nonetheless there is not much going on in them. Slightly tense, slightly unusual, slightly interesting.
CATCH is a `Radio 4' novel, perhaps better suited to Play of the Week than to bookshop shelves. There is no doubt, however, that it is very well written, and that Robson is a very talented writer. I guess that most educated people would `enjoy' CATCH if they were to pick it up and read it, I just can't really work out why anyone would pick it up.