I think these guys should stick to pictures! More on these particular pictures anon; the text accompanying them was disappointing- all too often merely a bald recitation of isolated facts, showing no appreciation of the importance or interest of the buildings depicted.
Furthermore, if it's an aerial picture that I'm looking at, I want the text to help me in that respect... being told that a cathedral contains a particular sculpture or painting is pretty low down my list of priorities when set alongside a picture of the exterior!
The pictures _were_ good, although I think I preferred the larger scale of the other Getmapping book I've bought ("Edinburgh- The Photographic Atlas", which was excellent). Perhaps aerial photography is better for landscape and context, rather then individual buildings.
Anyway, overall I guess I got my money-worth, but only just!