How dares this author destroy the wonderful character of Shahrazad? I understand that she wants to present a shy, physically imperfect girl (Marjan) as a person who realises her strength and helps Shahrazad inside the dangerous and cruel world of the harem. I understand that she wants to take the characters of the mythical story and make them round, flesh them out -and, very naively, make them soun "real". But did she have to depict Shaharzad as terrified and on the brink of a nervous breakdown, constantly fearing for her life? And, even worse, how do we believe, then, that even though she is afraid of being murdered by the sultan -as hundreds of girls had been before her- she, in fact, loves him? Uh??? The author wants the characters to sound "real" and she makes Shahrazad love a dangerous psycho-killer who has killed hundreds of young girls and who can also kill her any day??? And, this is really cheap!, the person responsible for this, the one who is really guilty of the sultan's behaviour is ... his mother!!! who manipulates him like a puppet. And yet Shahrazad deeply loves him. Well, I really didn't reach the end of this awful, stupid miscreation. The characters of THE ARABIAN NIGHTS cannot be taken as real people (it would be really difficult to explain their behaviour in real-life terms, especially the sultan's), they are myths or symbols. Shahrazad represents the strength and seduction that story-telling (in any form) has and will always have for us, humans. Her story-telling sessions teach, cure and, ultimately make human the sultan. Read to your children the original tales (which were such a children's classic in the 19th century) and don't destroy for them the character of Shahrazad, the power, fascination and wisdom that they will find in stroy-telling.