Most Helpful Customer Reviews
28 of 29 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
Keeps the pages turning and the secrets coming..., 1 Jun 2010
Customer review from the Amazon Vine™ Programme (What's this?)
Gary Goodhew is only 25 and the youngest detective in Cambridge. When he discovers a murdered girl he is given the chance to take a lead role in a high-profile murder case, but his maverick abilities cause him to clash with his boss; he and his partner dislike each other, and he knew one of the suspects at school. The case of Lorna Spense uncovers dark secrets in the Cambridge community and touches on more than a few secrets in Gary's own private life.
This is a page-turner of a novel that introduces an attractive young detective working the residential, rather than the collegial, side of Cambridge. Sex is placed right at the centre of the book, with erotic entanglements central to both the suspects and the police.
I liked much of the book: the pace, the tension, the sense of suspense, and certainly found myself unable to put it down - but there are some niggles, too, which become much bigger at the end (no spoilers following).
Some of the plot points seem very odd and unbelievable - e.g. the `anonymous' letters. And there are various threads that are started up at the beginning but which never really go anywhere (the conversations between Victoria and Lorna at the start, the revelations about Lorna's sexual fantasies). But the major issue which had this book dropping a star is the ending: the sudden flurry of revelations certainly keep us breathless but once you close the book and think about them, they cease to make much sense. So I was left wondering not who was responsible for the murders - but why?
So this is a great switch-your-brain-off relaxing read, exciting and fast-paced - but it actually doesn't stand up to much post-read analysis.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
17 of 19 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
Could have been much better, 2 Jun 2010
Customer review from the Amazon Vine™ Programme (What's this?)
In spite of some good things about this book, I found it rather hard going. It has a decent plot (although I found the denouement very muddled) and at times Alison Bruce writes very well - I thought the post-mortem scene was excellently done, for example - and she generates a good sense of Cambridge, but stilted language too often made both narrative and dialogue feel rather forced to me.
My biggest problem with the book, though, was that I found the character of the main protagonist, DC Gary Goodhew, increasingly implausible. I suspect that Ms Bruce is more than half in love with her creation - she makes him attractive but unaware of it, fabulously empathetic and non-sexist, far more intelligent and intuitive than any of his colleagues, and so bursting with integrity and the desire to do good that it's a wonder it doesn't give him a nose bleed. He even has cool taste in music. And just in case we haven't grasped the point, we get an anti-Gary against whom he can shine; a colleague who is vain, arrogant, bigoted, faithless, careless...and so on.
The author's infatuation with her creation means that he is allowed to get away with frankly ridiculous behaviour. He constantly acts unprofessionally and sometimes illegally, but (of course) unearths vital clues which skilled and experienced teams of experts have missed. His DI takes him off the case (of course), but within a couple of hours he is reinstated and, although he is exceptionally young and totally inexperienced, the same DI immediately entrusts him with conducting the interviews with the prime suspects in a high-profile murder case on his own. There's rather a lot of this sort of thing and I'm afraid I ended up finding it absurd, irritating and very distracting.
I didn't think this was a terrible book by any means, but it could have been far, far better. Alison Bruce is obviously setting Gary Goodhew up for a series of novels; if she sticks to writing in the unaffected style of the best parts of this book, cuts out the clichés of the genre and brings rather more discipline to her treatment of her characters the novels could turn out to be rather good, but I'm afraid I can only give this one a lukewarm recommendation.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
14 of 16 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
Cambridge by numbers, 5 Jun 2010
Customer review from the Amazon Vine™ Programme (What's this?)
This crime novel is the first in a projected series by Alison Bruce set in Cambridgeshire and featuring detective Gary Goodhew; I found it an easy read, with some well-written scenes, but ultimately rather unsatisfying. I think my main problem with this novel was the resolution of the murder mystery plot itself; the ending was rather convoluted and clumsily handled, and I found myself losing track of who did what and what the motive was. I enjoyed some of the characterisation, especially the gradual detailing of Lorna Spence, the first murder victim, and found Goodhew a refreshing lead in some respects, with his relative youth and lack of a tortured past thus far (although there are hints that more might be revealed in later novels concerning his family). However, other reviewers here are correct in pointing out that most of the rest of the police force are merely used as foils to showcase Goodhew's supposed brilliance, which does become rather wearing.
I was particularly keen to read this novel as I live in Cambridge, and Bruce clearly knows the city down to the ground. There was something rather creepy in being able to pinpoint almost to the square yard where each murder took place... Having said that, however, I felt that she failed to capture the atmosphere of her selected locality very well; although she runs through an accurate litany of street names and landmarks as the characters move about the city, I was only able to visualise a real image of each setting through my prior knowledge of what the street or area looks like, and so if you don't know Cambridge well, I'm thinking this might all fall a bit flat. This formed part of a wider problem I had with the writing, which was that it seemed very clinical and rather clunky at times. For some scenes this worked well - for example, the early sequences from Lorna's point of view - but I found myself losing interest about halfway through, when in most good crime novels, this is the point at which I'm drawn further in.
Although I haven't really read a huge range of crime fiction, I think this novel reminded me most of PD James's style in the way it delved into the minds of a number of the potential suspects and background figures, while attemping a wider portrait of Cambridge, but it's nowhere near as good as any of her work. However, I would still recommend it to crime fiction fans as a reasonably good read, and I suspect that, as this is Bruce's first novel, later installments might be better.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
|