Just wanted to give a big thumbs up to "A CBT Practitioner's Guide To ACT" by Joe Ciarrochi and Ann Bailey. They have done a superb job of building bridges between ACT and CBT, honoring and appreciating both models, and looking openly and honestly at areas of overlap and areas of differences, without judging either one as "better" or "superior" to the other. They also show how you can use ACT techniques to enhance your CBT while staying within that model, or, if you choose to move from the CBT model to the ACT model, how you can bring most of CBT with you, (provided you tweak certain parts of it, and make the philosophical shift from mechanism to contextualism). Of particular interest to me was the section on differences and similarities in exposure, as done in each model. Another really fascinating section of the book looks at where RFT would predict cognitive challenging to be effective, and where RFT predicts it would be ineffective. Also some great stuff in here tying ACT with emotional intelligence, and some truly excellent handouts and worksheets for clients. And as if all that wans't enough, there are stacks of new metaphors and techniques and worksheets, and plenty of humor and funny cartoons thrown in. Also some very accessible writing about RFT, which is a huge achievement in and of itself. I went to bed at 11pm last night intending to read the opening chapter, and found myself still reading away at 3 am. I'm knackered, but it was well worth it. An absolutely essential read for anyone with one foot in each camp, or for those eager to learn more about similarities and differences between these two powerful and effective models.