The Butlerian Jihad: Legends of Dune [Paperback]

 

 

Create your own review

...I found it an enjoyable read, though it in no way is as deep as the original Dune novels. On the other hand, maybe we should stop compare these newer Dune novels to the older ones, and just view them as a new series altogether (especially in this book, few of the original story elements remain... Arrakis is only spoken of sporadically, Caladan is not spoken of, etc...)

The book is a quick read (though I was not as quick as the previous reviewer, reading 606 pages in three hours, is a fast 200 page average :)) - it's enjoyable all through... But that's it. Don't expect anything deeper than just enjoyable well-written english...

Hope this helps!

This isn't a complete review of the book, just some points that I think others who are thinking of buying the book should know.

First of all, I did enjoy the book. I've read the other prequels (House...) which I didn't think were written very well (but they were still worth reading). Fortunately, I think the authors' style has improved.

As much as I enjoyed reading this book, my big problem was that it failed to deliver almost all of what it promised on its back cover. I was getting very worried that so much had to be wrapped up in the last few pages and, when I finally finished it, I felt that there was so much missing.

I took a quick look on Amazon to see what others thought and, to my delight, found that there are 2 more books that follow this novel (where apparently the story continues and hopefully everything gets wrapped up nicely). I really think the authors should have mentioned that this book was part 1 of 3 and restricted the précis on the back to what was actually contained in the book.

This isn't really a stand-alone book. It isn't even the first book of a trilogy. It's the first third of an 1800+ page epic.

Chris.

Way back in 1994, early in the lifespan of its line of Star Wars tie-in novels. Bantam published The Jedi Academy Trilogy by the then-unheard of Kevin J. Anderson. A fanbase invigorated by Timothy Zahn's enjoyable, excellently-paced trilogy featuring Grand Admiral Thraw eagerly seized on any new Star Wars fiction that was being produced (explaining why the so-so Truce at Bakura and the awful Courtship of Princess Leia became instant bestsellers). In the case of this trilogy, this proved to be unwise. Featuring morally corrupt would-be Jedi who kill billions and then get forgiven by Luke Skywalker because they felt bad about it, and a superweapon that makes the Death Star look pitiful (a ship called the Sun Crusher which can destroy star systems and is indestructible), The Jedi Academy Trilogy appeared to be the ultimate work of deluded fan fiction. Naturally, it sold huge amounts of copies.

Soon enough, Anderson was everywhere. He was writing X-Files novels. His own creations, utterly unremarkable with the exception of the mildly diverting Climbing Olympus, were soon spreading insidiously over bookshelves everywhere. Could he not be stopped? And then the final ignomy: he convinced Brian Herbert to help him co-write the books that would continue Herbert's father's Dune series.

Readers braced themselves for something horrifying, but unexpectedly the Prelude to Dune Trilogy (House Atreides, House Harkonnen and House Corrino) turned out to be okay. Not great, obviously, but readable. Naturally, the books contradicted established Dune canon all over the shop and the characters only really worked because Frank Herbert had already established them, but compared to other cash-in books out there these were definitely nowhere near as bad as they could have been.

Alas, the same cannot be said for the Legends of Dune Trilogy. Set ten thousand years before the events of Dune, roughly the same amount of time into our future, the trilogy chronicles how humankind freed itself from slavery at the hands of the 'thinking machines' and embarked on a bloody war that after a century saw the machines vanquished and the great Imperium founded. As with the earlier trilogy, Anderson and Herbert almost immediately started deviating from established Dune canon: the Butlerian Jihad is depicted in the original novels as a much more equal war, with the humans deciding to destroy the machines after a cult of humans worshipping the AIs as gods is uncovered (hence the whole, "You shall not build a machine in the likeness of a human mind," stuff). This is also the version of the struggle Frank Herbert depicted in the 1984 Dune Companion and formed the basis of the notes for his own planned prequel novel (which he was apparently planning to write following the seventh Dune novel). For reasons that are not entirely clear, Herbert and Anderson decided that was lame and went with their own, original creation.

It is difficult to describe how inept this series is. The Dune universe is one that is rich in fantastic and original concepts, worlds and characters. To make it appear to be bland and silly actually takes some skill, skills which the authors clearly brought to this project with enthusiasm. The characters are, at best, two-dimensional cyphers. The AIs are incredibly stupid and do not operate with anything approaching logic. The preponderence of force on the AIs' side is so ridiculous the human rebels should not even have the slightest chance of victory (hence why in Frank Herbert's original vision the two sides were equal to start off with), let alone the freedom to spend decades developing their Holtzman shields, las-guns, spacefolding technology and so forth. Also, we are led to believe that not just the Imperium and the Houses, but also the Bene Gesserit, the Suk School, the Spacing Guild, the Fremen, the swordmasters of Ginaz, the Mentats, the face-dancers and just about every single other concept in the Dune series was established simultaneously (in Herbert's original plan the Bene Gesserit had already existed for centuries, albeit with a different agenda) in an awe-inspiring display of pure fanwank.

Does this series bring any positive qualities to the table? No. The plotting is so mechanical it feels like it was procedurally generated by a computer algorithm. The characters are cyphers at best, who do not operate in accordance with generally-accepted principles of logic or intelligence. Vast reams of the three books are taken up by tedious info-dumping and exposition. This is a cold, cynical exercise in making money from fans starved of new material for too long by two authors who have lost whatever credibility they once had in the genre.

The Prelude to Dune Trilogy (*) is a work that can only justly be described in terms not appropriate for polite reviewing. Whilst it is true that the original Dune novels by Frank Herbert themselves went off the boil in later years, even the worst of them is preferable to this drivel. Avoid.

Share your thoughts with other customers: Create your own review

› See all 50 customer reviews on Amazon.co.uk

 

2.0 out of 5 stars badly written and conceived
This book seems to have been rushed. The Prelude to Dune series was better as the characters thought more about situations and other people's motivations. Read more

Published 4 days ago by ac

3.0 out of 5 stars Nice start to the series
There are loads of reviews that give this book 1 star and I think that is very harsh. The problem comes with the fact that the original books are SOOO good that anything that isnt... Read more

Published 9 months ago by Martin Mcauley

5.0 out of 5 stars Dune
Having now read whole Dune Saga, from Jihad to Hunters of Dune. Wow, in a term from the 60's mind blowing. Fully recommended to every sci fi nut out there.

Published 11 months ago by Caz

5.0 out of 5 stars Contextually superb extension of the Dune universe!
I have read many reviews of this book that give a very poor rating; the most prominent criticism tends to be that the quality of writing doesn't match the original Frank Herbert... Read more

Published on 18 May 2009 by ezytouch

1.0 out of 5 stars Utterly dire
I couldn't finish it, turgid writing, zero characterisation, clunky plotting, B-movie sensibilities without the fun, cruelty for cruelty's sake, awful. Read more

Published on 4 April 2009 by Dr. J. Harris

1.0 out of 5 stars A disappointment on every level
The first time I finished reading Frank Herbert's masterpiece Dune, I turned straight back to the first page and started it again. Read more

Published on 20 Jun 2007 by C. D. Hunter

4.0 out of 5 stars Not bad
In my opinion the book had a reasonably good story line albeit nothing too special. I wouldnt describe the characters as being 1-dimensional like a previous reviewer but again,... Read more

Published on 19 Jun 2007 by R. Barlas

3.0 out of 5 stars The Butler Didn't Really Do It For Me
This really was one of the books I had anticipated when I learnt of the prequels being written by Brian Herbert and his partner-in-crime, Kevin Anderson. Read more

Published on 19 Jan 2007 by ESP

1.0 out of 5 stars Awful Cash-in
I am a big fan of the original Dune books. I would rate them as 9 / 10.
The Prelude to Dune books (despite my initial concerns) get a respectable 7/10. Read more

Published on 17 Oct 2006 by Cameron Wyatt

1.0 out of 5 stars Deeply disappointing reading
I was a huge fan of the original Dune trilogy, and so picked this up to while away a long journey. I was in for a disappointing trip. Read more

Published on 18 May 2006 by G. English

Search Customer Reviews
Only search this product's reviews

› See all 50 customer reviews on Amazon.co.uk

Search Listmania!