Despite there being a wealth of primary source information at hand for the West Port Murders, the myths of Edinburgh's most infamous criminals persists to this day. With that in mind, it is a sheer delight that I stumbled upon Brian Bailey's most thorough and logical investigation and summary of the murders of William Burke and William Hare. I got my copy from, of all places, an airport bookshop. This is the notorious home of trashy fiction, superfluous ghost-written celebrity autobiographies, "tragic-porn" true stories, "hard men" books and general pulp non-fiction. It is not the place that I would expect to find such a well-researched and scholarly myth-busting investigation. All I can say is that it is about time.
Most half-decent writers on the case get the basics of the story right - as do the onscreen horror films. They should do. The story is brief, covering barely a year, and is filled with so much sinister and extraordinarily heartless infamy only the clumsiest of hack writers would feel the need to stray off the path. This is not to say that myths haven't built up around this notorious iconic duo. Bailey does a thorough job into debunking such myths as the story about Burke breaking a boy's back across his knee or the fate of Hare wondering the streets of London as a blind beggar. However, his investigation goes far deeper. He also goes onto examine Dr Robert Knox's character and his later career, which seemed to be not nearly as badly affected as most writers would have you believe. He also gives logical and reasoned arguments for the order of victims, which is a common area of disagreement among writers on the case, and provides shockingly commonsensical revelations like the virtual impossibility that their first victim could have owed Hare £4.
Bailey's book has been criticised for being a book unsuitable for a first time reader of the case. I can see the point of the criticism, but it is written in a suitably engaging style and there is more than enough fiction on the screen - not to mention on some of the dubious "history tours" that are sold in Edinburgh - to give interested readers at least some idea of how the story went.
So if you have enjoyed or being satisfyingly scared by any number of the films based on the crimes of Burke and Hare - "The Greed of William Hart", "The Flesh and the Fiends", "The Horror of Burke and Hare" or "The Doctor and the Devils" - or fiction inspired by them - Robert L. Stevenson's classic short story, "The Bodysnatcher" or the Boris Karloff minor classic, "Corridors of Blood" - or if you are looking forward John Landis's latest feature film, "Burke and Hare", I would highly recommend that you purchase a copy of this book. It will help not only to filter out a lot of popular mythology created, but also to establish the true horror of what went on.