Freedom, progress, fame, money, the nation-state, corporate capitalism, mechanistic science, civil society, consumerism; hardly new themes, but this inquiry into the origins of our preoccupation with them casts them in a different light. Loy's lack approach has not attempted a "balanced" evaluation that weighs the positive against the negative consequences for our historical development - whatever that might mean. Instead, the argument has been that each is problematical in a way that has been little noticed, if at all.
If the argument is valid, what does it mean for us today? Our ever-growing technological powers imply that it is increasingly dangerous for us to be motivated by an unconscious drive for "being", for a grounding that can never be attained in the way we seek it.
From a traditional religious perspective, the most important characteristic of the modern world is its secularity, more precisely our understanding of ourselves as motivated by solely this-worldly possibilities. After lack itself, therefore, the most important thread that winds its way through all the chapters is the notion that a lack of perspective vitiates our usual distinction between sacred and secular. If the problem provided by our sense of lack cannot be avoided, the difference between sacred and secular is reduced to where we think our lack can be resolved. This leaves us, finally, with an urgent question: What does this critique mean for those of us now reluctant to believe in mythological notions of transcendence? If our "secular" responses are not working to assuage our lack, as Loy has argued, then what solutions are possible for those agnostic of other "higher" worlds? The author concludes his study with some reflections on this, which amplify some hints scattered here and there in the chapters.