This is a collection of George Monbiot's Guardian articles.
On the environment, he notes that biofuels are a disaster: biodiesel from palm oil emits ten times as much carbon dioxide as ordinary diesel. But he blames President Bush for this, not the EU, when it is the EU, not the USA, that determines Britain's policy.
Monbiot admits that some trials of GM food are "improving both yield and nutritional content ... [and] ... these could well be of benefit to small farmers in the developing world." So why does he oppose it?
His articles on the current wars contain nothing new - that the US state sabotaged negotiations with both Iraq and Afghanistan, and that its forces torture POWs and use white phosphorus and napalm as anti-personnel weapons. He rightly, but unoriginally, notes that most British newspapers "were willing accomplices in the Pentagon's campaign of disinformation."
He includes some good articles exposing the World Bank and the IMF and the Labour government's despicable role in these bodies, although we could do with more detail. But he calls Paul Wolfowitz's appointment as president of the World Bank `a good thing', because it "highlights the profoundly unfair and undemocratic nature of decision-making at the Bank" - the classic ultra-left fallacy of `the worse, the better'.
He shows how the British state's foreign aid does more harm than good and exposes Clare Short's vile role in promoting privatisations abroad. Her Department for International Development gave £7.6 million to the Adam Smith Institute's maniacs to sponsor privatisation in South Africa, Zambia, India and Ghana. The Labour government allows the developing countries debt relief only if they `boost private sector development' and end `impediments to private investment, both domestic and foreign'.
All too often, Monbiot argues against his opponents' weakest arguments, which gives him cheap victories, as when he tells, yet again, the story of David Bellamy's error about glaciers. Monbiot likes easy targets like Jeremy Clarkson, second home owners, tax cheats and the Daily Telegraph, and he avoids stronger opponents like Bjorn Lomborg and Marxists.