Buy Used
+ £2.80 UK delivery
Used: Very Good | Details
Condition: Used: Very Good
Comment: Dispatched from the US -- Expect delivery in 2-3 weeks. Great condition for a used book! Minimal wear. 100% Money Back Guarantee. Shipped to over one million happy customers. Your purchase benefits world literacy!
Trade in your item
Get a £0.34
Gift Card.
Have one to sell?
Flip to back Flip to front
Listen Playing... Paused   You're listening to a sample of the Audible audio edition.
Learn more
See all 2 images

A Brief History of Everything Paperback – 9 Jan 2001

See all 4 formats and editions Hide other formats and editions
Amazon Price New from Used from
Paperback, 9 Jan 2001

Trade In this Item for up to £0.34
Trade in A Brief History of Everything for an Amazon Gift Card of up to £0.34, which you can then spend on millions of items across the site. Trade-in values may vary (terms apply). Learn more

Product details

  • Paperback: 330 pages
  • Publisher: Shambhala Publications Inc; 2nd edition edition (9 Jan. 2001)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 1570627401
  • ISBN-13: 978-1570627408
  • Product Dimensions: 15.2 x 2.4 x 22.8 cm
  • Average Customer Review: 2.5 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (2 customer reviews)
  • Amazon Bestsellers Rank: 442,854 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

More About the Author

Discover books, learn about writers, and more.

Inside This Book (Learn More)
Browse and search another edition of this book.
Browse Sample Pages
Front Cover | Copyright | Table of Contents | Excerpt | Index | Back Cover
Search inside this book:

Customer Reviews

2.5 out of 5 stars
5 star
4 star
3 star
2 star
1 star
See both customer reviews
Share your thoughts with other customers

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

28 of 30 people found the following review helpful By Ian on 6 July 2008
Format: Mass Market Paperback Verified Purchase
Q: so the whole book is in Q&A format?
A: yes, all 500+ pages.
Q: Really. So how did that make you feel?
A: I found it very irritating indeed. It means there are continual breaks in the flow, and the chummy nature of the questions just didn't work for me.
Q: I'm sorry to hear that. What about the content itself?
A: It's fascinating (like both the other KW books I've read so far). It has similar content to "Integral Psychology", but is more accessible for those new to the subject.
2 Comments Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
3 of 4 people found the following review helpful By N. Coles on 12 April 2009
Format: Mass Market Paperback
The real attraction of this book is the scope and the volume of concepts from established philosophers thrown in. Unfortunately none of these have the same Q&A opportunity to comment on Wilbur's paraphrasing of their own ideas or his energetic attempts to blend them.Instead its left to his imaginary friend who doesn't offer anything in the way of a challenge to the ideas presented.
The negatives of this book are 1)obsessive categorisation 2)tenuous and misleading argumentation-including falling into the philosophical paradoxes it identifies and 3)Conclusions (especially the AQUAL model)that dont really lead to much practical other than 'lead a holistic life'(considering balance and the I, the We and the it in all things).
The positives-1)it does cover a lot of ground,even whilst missing 99.9% of paradigms 2) I'll make you think and 3)for all his limitations Wilbur is part of the solution not the problem. Hopefully others will contribute to that solution.
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again

Most Helpful Customer Reviews on (beta) 117 reviews
198 of 223 people found the following review helpful
Read With Care: A Summary of the Content 7 May 2001
By Roben Torosyan PhD - Published on
Format: Paperback
[For full review, see forthcoming, Torosyan, R. (2001). A system for everything: Book review of K. Wilber's Brief History of Everything. New Ideas in Psychology, 19 (3).]
Wilber manages to create a sweeping system for everything in life. He describes our spiritual evolution, and our dominant conceptual concerns: East and West, ancient and modern, individual and collective, physical and metaphysical. Wilber writes in an accessible common-sense style. He deliberately avoids a typical scholarly tone. While not free of some pretense at a monolithic voice, his work promotes rich conceptions of self-reflexiveness, interconnection, spirituality and empathy.
Wilber shows how the major theories of biological, psychological, cognitive and spiritual development describe different versions of how to find "the truth." At the outset, Wilber refers to Douglas Adams's best-selling cult novel Hitchhiker's Guide To The Galaxy. We desire final conclusions, just as Adams facetiously proposed the "answer that would completely explain 'God, life, the universe, and everything'" (p. xv). In the novel, that answer was "42," highlighting the absurdity of seeking such a final answer.
Wilber's "answer," instead, is a framework for connecting evolutionary currents. At first, he uses a Socratic dialogue, beginning with "KW" for Wilber and "Q" for the questioner, be s/he reader, fan, or friend. Initially, this appears somewhat contrived. The text pretends to be an interview, when it is clearly the author's own highly controlled construction. Upon further reading, however, the stylistic device helps Wilber engage the reader in a dialogue.
To Wilber, traditions of thought have usually been either "ascending" toward transcendental spirituality, or "descending" to the body, the senses, and sexuality (p. 11). The author suggests that humans must integrate dualities to survive as a species. In fact, we must not merely synthesize but accept the "nonduality" of ascending and descending, mind and body (p. 12).
Wilber's first chapter presents a brief summary of the entire book in the voice of the questioner:
Q: So we'll start with the story of the Big Bang itself, and then trace out the course of evolution from matter to life to mind. And then, with the emergence of mind, or human consciousness, we'll look at the five or six major epochs of human evolution itself. And all of this is set in the context of spirituality-of what spirituality means, of the various forms that it has historically taken, and the forms that it might take tomorrow. Sound right?
KW: Yes, it's sort of a brief history of everything...based on what I call 'orienting generalizations' (p. 17)
"Q" is obviously more highly informed than a first-time reader. Wilber uses Q less to ask questions than to help simplify points [the book summarizes the more complex content of Wilber's massive Sex, Ecology, Spirituality (1995)]. The "generalizations" he notes are Kohlberg's and Gilligan's moral stages. "Human moral development goes through at least three broad stages" (p. 17). In brief: before the child is socialized, it is "preconventional," as it learns the values of society it becomes "conventional," and eventually it may reflect on its own values critically, becoming increasingly "postconventional."
Wilber goes on to show a number of "tenets" or "patterns that connect." The first of these is that "reality is composed of whole/parts, or 'holons'" (p. 20). A holon is something that is itself "a whole and simultaneously a part of some other whole" (ibid.). Borrowing from Arthur Koestler, Wilber argues that the world is full of "holarchies," as opposed to hierarchies. Where a hierarchy typically separates distinct parts, a holarchy consists of both wholes that are parts, and parts that are wholes. For example, an atom is a whole of its own, but also a part of a whole molecule. A whole molecule is a part of a whole cell, and a whole cell is part of a whole organism. As Wilber says, "Time goes on, and today's wholes are tomorrow's parts" (ibid.).
Wilber uses the ideas of "depth" and "span" to say that whenever we map a territory, something always gets left out. For instance, as we narrow focus with a microscope, "There are fewer organisms than cells; there are fewer cells than molecules; there are fewer molecules than atoms; there are fewer atoms than quarks. Each has a greater depth, but less span" (p. 34). Similarly, if we move from mysticism and psychology, into biology and physics, the progression gives greater depth of specific detail but less span, embrace, or inclusion of levels of reality (pp. 36-38). These dimensions are neither dependent nor independent, but interdependent.
Great shifts in "reality" paradigms were brought by what Wilber calls "the watershed separating the modern and postmodern approaches to knowledge" (p. 58). Postmodernists criticize old paradigms such as "the Enlightenment,... the Newtonian, the Cartesian, the mechanistic, the mirror of nature, the reflection paradigm" (ibid.). In opposition, many postmodernists propose that "all truth is relative and merely culture-bound, there are no universal truths" (pp. 62-63). But as Wilber notes, even Derrida now concedes the elemental point that worldviews are not "'merely constructed' in the sense of totally relative and arbitrary" (p. 62). In Wilber's diagnosis, assertions that "there is no truth in the Kosmos, only those notions that men force on others," are nihilistic, replacing truth with "the ego of the theorist" (p. 63).
As a tool to place different worldviews, Wilber uses "four quadrants of development" (pp. 71-75). The exterior form of development is measured objectively and empirically. The interior dimension is subjective and interpretive, and hence depends on consciousness and introspection. And both interior and exterior occur not just separately but in social or cultural context.
Wilber describes how Foucault summarized the "monological madness" that dominated the eighteenth century and Enlightenment notions of the subject: "the subjective and intersubjective domains were thus reduced to empirical studies-I and we were reduced to its- and thus humans became 'objects of information, never subjects in communication'" (p. 269). Treated as objects, people were expected to meet norms of mental health, for instance, while their subjective position in the world was ignored.
Wilber says the whole of his morality aims to "protect and promote the greatest depth for the greatest span" (p. 335). He argues we must use these criteria when we make judgments. Although the spirituality risks opacity, the overall effort suggests deeply researched and grounded ways to structure reality. If we as a society need human empathy for multiple perspectives, then the patterns of thought laid out by Wilber provide a system for integrating such perspectives. Distilling messages of vast ranges of thought, Wilber presents highly differentiated worldviews and multiple points of intervention through which we can, if contingently, take action.
256 of 296 people found the following review helpful
New Age Intelligent Design Theory 26 April 2006
By Gregory Gilman - Published on
Format: Paperback
This is a disappointing book. I had read a couple of Wilber's earlier books and liked them, especially the superb "Grace and Grit." At his best, he can be very good at explaining a nondualistic Eastern style philosophy.

As the title suggests, this book is meant to introduce people to an all encompassing metaphysical system. No one could attempt such an enterprise without a little hubris. But why stop at a little? Wilber is fond of dropping the names of long lists of famous intellectuals whose work he finds consistent with, but subservient to, his system. Reality is sliced and diced in an endless taxonomy of levels, holons, stages, paradigm shifts, quadrants, centers, spheres and fulcrums before being reassembled into a nondualistic whole. Anyone satisfied with scientific explainations is dismissed as a "reductionist" holding what he calls "an insane world view." The science based world view is not so much argued against as it is insulted, dismissed and misrepresented.

The most remarkable thing in this book is it's bizzare description of neo-Darwinian evolutionary theory. He makes the astonishing claim that very few theorists believe in Darwinian evolution and that, "There is no evidence whatsoever for intermediate (fossil) forms." Wilber maintains it would take at least a hundred simultaneous beneficial mutations for something like a wing to evolve. He claims this would have to occur separately in both a male and a female who would then have to mate successfully. This is a grotesque caricature of Darwinan theory. Anyone who thinks it is adequate should buy this book. Others should read Richard Dawkins "Climbing Mount Improbable." Wilber never names any scientists who advocate this version of evolution for the very good reason that there aren't any.

What accounts for this straw man caricature of the most foundational scientific theory in modern biology? Well, Darwinian theory predicts that two species competing for the same niche will compete very fiercely. Wilber's Hegelian style spirit based pantheism competes with a science based pantheism in the tradition of Spinoza, Darwin and Einstein.

This book is written in a question and answer format. I bought it on audio cassette. The questions were read by a young woman. Her tone indicates she is struggling to understand. She is always co-operative and eager to receive the wisdom from on high. The answers are read by a man. His tone is authoritative and patiently condescending. This is perfect for the text.

Here is a one sentence sample, from the book, of Wilber's writing at it's worst: "So we have some very popular theorists who, tired of the burdens of postconventional and world-centric rational perspectivism, recommend a regressive slide into egocentric vital impulsive polymorphous phantasmic emotional revival." Like Hegel, Wilber has attracted legions of readers who assume that his most incomprehensible writing must be his most brilliant. If you are willing to make that assumption, this book will delight you.
28 of 32 people found the following review helpful
Life-changing philosophy 10 Mar. 2003
By Tina B. Tessina - Published on
Format: Paperback Verified Purchase
For any thinking person who's struggling with the schism between science, psychology and faith, this book has the answer. Mr. Wilber has an amazing mind, and in this book he simplifies his theoretical framework to make his brilliant thought easier to grasp. I disagree with the reader who complained about lack of references -- all the footnotes are available in his other works. This is the synthesis of his thought for those who want to understand, not those who want to nit-pick.
For me, it's a life-changing book, showing the way to order my own thoughts and experiences. Wilber is the only writer I've come across, other than James Hillman, who helps me reconcile all my disparate reading and experience.
In this book, he perfectly and succinctly outlines the growth process I see in my clients who are struggling to overcome dysfunction, find meaning in life and transcend their pasts.
I am grateful for this book's influence in my thought, and in my work as a therapist.
26 of 30 people found the following review helpful
A joy to read 14 Feb. 2003
By A Customer - Published on
Format: Paperback
Ken Wilber has written many many books discussing his beef against what he calls "flatland", which is characteristic of the western civilization as well as the modern world in general. I believe that he makes his point most clearly in this book as well as "Sex, Ecology, and Spirituality". Although "Sex Ecology and Sprituality" is a scholarly masterpiece, this book is the easier to understand for the lay reader. If you are new to Wilber's "Comprehensive Everything" type books, I would suggest reading this book before reading his other ones. I think although many of us Wilber lovers struggle to fully understand and appreciate his vision, his books are a true joy to read. If you are interested in these topics, another book that is easy and enjoyable to read is "Rhythm, Relationships, and Transcendence" by Toru Sato. It is also a wonderful book on the subject-object differentiation (dual vs nondual)! Both books help remind us that although our world of objects is useful, the world of subjects is what makes it beautiful! Happy reading!
29 of 34 people found the following review helpful
Bad Reviews - A Reply 3 Jun. 2013
By Kurt in Seattle - Published on
Format: Kindle Edition
I love reading the 1-2 star reviews for Wilber, as they can be classified into two groups, those who don't actually understand what he's saying (I was guilty of this once when reading his "pre/trans fallacy" essay, but I re-read it and finally got around my objections) and those who simply don't know what they don't even know.

Reductionist and materialists -- your arguments are embarrassing and Rupert Sheldrakes book "Science Set Free" takes you to the philosophical woodshed, will you learn your lesson? Of course not. Because trying to explain expanded reality to someone who see's nothing more than atoms and matter arranged in ever more complex meaningless patterns is like trying to explain sex to someone who's never had sex. Someone can write out a really detailed account of every motion, every sensation, every feeling, but if you haven't had sex, then it can't be sugar coated, you dont even know what you dont even know. Sorry if that sounds arrogant, but it's reality. The same is true for people who've never experienced an intense non-dual state of consciousness.

In this book Wilber attempts, I think quite well, to bring every possible worldview and bit of human knowledge into his map and show how it fits, how all of it is useful in some way, and how all of it can be improved with an expanded view and put into its evolutionary context (and he freely admits that because all his work is based on evolution that Wilber 1.0 is not the same as Wilber 3.0, later books correct mistakes in earlier books) For anyone who is tempted to see evolution as confined to the obvious biological sciences, Wilber explains how evolution is everywhere and nothing can escape it (not even his own work).

If you think his book is too "light" for you philosophically, then read his epistemological essay "The Three Eyes Of Knowledge" ... which is the underpinning for everything else he writes. If you still disagree with him, then we're back to that old pesky problem of how to explain consciousness. And on that issue, again, you've either "been there, done that" or you haven't when it comes to admitting that there's a 3rd eye of knowledge. You either view ultimate reality with 2D vision, or with a more realistic 3D perspective.

When it comes to adding mystical experience to any reality paradigm, there is no sitting on the sidelines and thinking about it, you either jump into the game and live and breathe it, or you can "think" about it for days, weeks, years and never get it. Your criticism is devoid of direct experience and knowledge. It's like someone who's never played quarterback in the NFL telling Brady, Rogers or Manning how to do it properly.

I don't ever critique advanced forms of math like non-linear dynamics because I've never done the homework to understand it. It's beyond my current comprehension. So why should someone who's never done the "homework" involved to discover the 3rd eye of knowledge feel like their opinion about it is valid? It's not. Either jump in the deep end of the pool by giving mystical experience a try, or continue to write critiques that are frankly embarrassing because you don't even know what you don't even know.
Were these reviews helpful? Let us know