If you're looking for a book that affirms a stereotypical view of the causes of the war in Lebanon, then this is not for you.
Unlike other "authors" who claim that the conflict in Lebanon was sectarian in which the Palestinian Liberation Organisation (PLO) was reluctantly caught up, Professor el Khazen contends otherwise. In this heavily researched work, Professor el Khazen pulls no punches and does not follow the trend of simplifying the conflict. The arrival of the PLO in Lebanon; its militant activity in trying to turn Lebanon into a 'confrontation state'; its interference in internal Lebanese politics, as well as attempts to internationalize their plight, signalled the beginning of a downward spiral towards conflict in Lebanon. He writes: 'PLO armed presence has fundamentally derailed the course of Lebanese politics and has deeply disrupted sectarian relations.'
Professor el Khazen looks at the political situation in Lebanon prior to the appearance of the PLO on the scene and finds that the political system in Lebanon was working and adapting to the needs of the Lebanese. Where it was found to be deficient it was reformed. Thus he concludes that the political system was not the cause of the conflict; it was the best formula for its time and would undoubtedly have continued to change if not for the conflict. He also looks at the economic situation in Lebanon prior to the arrival of the PLO and even after its arrival. Here he concludes that economic data demonstrates that the gap between rich and poor in Lebanon was not wide, in fact it faired well compared to some developed countries. Moreover, Lebanon's economic performance was matching that of many western developed states. Again economics was not the cause of conflict.
He does not negate the role of the Lebanese in the conflict, but argues that the PLO and other international players that came along with it, succeeded in disrupting the system and playing on sectarian fears and aspiration in order to achieve their goal...