The main issue with Joshua Harris' books is that he seems unable to write books which will appeal to everyone. Readers responses vary from 'I love it' to 'I hate it', two extremes which are evoked by his extreme (some might argue legalistic) perspective.
Courtship certainly sounds romantic, and seems governed by godly principles and it also seems safe. It is a relationship between a man and a woman who are actively and intentionally together to consider marriage; 'relationship with a purpose.' It sounds good, but the more Joshua attempts to explain what courtship is, several things about it struck me as contradictory, vague, and (dare I say it), undefined. It's contradictory because it sounds like a big deal, and it is - it's making a committment to someone. 'By setting a clear course for romance by answering the 'What's the point?' question at the very outset.' But he also says that 'We shouldn't make courtship a bigger deal than it is.' Courtship sounds vague and undefined because you're only considering the possibility of marriage. It's not a form of engagement. You might realise after a time that you're not heading towards marriage. Do you see what I'm getting at here? On one hand it's a serious committment, on the other hand it's not. There's a lot of grey area involved.
Another issue about courtship, and this isn't really about the book itself, is: will courtship work in inexperienced churches? Joshua Harris apparently was already attending a church where courtship was a well established practice. He mentions couples and friends he has who were also courting, and obviously the pastor and older couples were able to mentor them successfully by advising them on how best to progress in their relationship. But in the UK, courtship is not practiced in the church (at least, I've never come across any couple who has adopted Joshua's methods), and ministers and leaders will probably be unfamiliar with what it's about. They may be unsure about what their role is and how best to guide couples in a courtship, unless they decide to adhere rigidly to the book, which they might find a little dull, or simply impractical.
Joshua and Shannon decide to save their first kiss for their wedding day. Sound extreme? He doesn't advise all couples to do this, but he thought it necessary to draw up a list of guidelines on the physical boundaries he and Shannon had to keep to. Physical contact was kept to an absolute minimum - limited to hand-holding and 'brief side hugs.' Oh, and he was allowed to put his arm round her shoulder. And yet, he admits a few pages on that 'I sinned more in my heart without kissing Shannon than many guys who kiss their girlfriends.' This revelation was shocking to me, because Joshua Harris is so strict, almost puritantical - in his approach to sex and physical sin. I guess he thought that as long as he had a list of rules to follow then he would be safe. But that's simply not the case. While I can understand his reasons for following them, I think it proves that adopting a list of rules and regulations do not automatically make you immune to sexual desire. I also can't help wondering that if Joshua and Shannon had not compromised their purity in previous relationships, would they have gone to such extremes? Joshua knew about Shannon's past, so maybe he was trying to protect her.
In Part 2, Chapter 7 Joshua addresses the specific gender roles assigned to men and women. While I didn't have a problem with what he had to say, when the topic of dressing modestly cropped up in the part 'A Challenge To The Girls: Be Godly Ladies', I was amused, aghast and insulted at the same time. Why? Well, he's presuming that Christian girls and young women are wearing midriff-revealing, low-cut tops and short skirts and need to be told to dress modestly. I can think of NON-Christian young women who could do with his advice, but NOT women who ARE Christians. I'm sure that Joshua didn't intend to come across as patronising, but I sure don't need to take his fashion advice. Nor do I need to 'ask my father or another Christian woman to honestly evaluate my clothing', as he suggests. If I wonder whether an outfit is inappropriate (not that that ever happens) all I have to do is look in the mirror! Rest assured, Josh, women do not need to 'sacrifice fashion to be obedient to God' - we can be as fashionable as we like without having everything on display!
The final points about courtship is: I'm not sure if I can see British men going in for this kind of thing. For many, throwing the possibility of marriage into a first date might be too scary or too much pressure. And how exactly do you approach someone and ask them to take a step into courtship with you? Do you say 'Hi, would you mind if I courted you?' Or how about 'Let's go courting!' You couldn't mention courtship without making a speech about your feelings for them, and if their answer was 'no' then this would hurt a lot more than if you had only asked them out on a date. The other thing I felt acutely when I reached the end of his book was that it didn't have much to offer single people. The fact is, Joshua didn't have to wait very long for marriage. Although he apparently struggled with staying sexually pure in his previous relationships, by the time he was 24, he was happily married. There are many Christians who have to wait much much longer and find being single much more painful than he ever did. I appreciate the gist of Joshua's book, but I am not sure if courtship is compatible in every church, nor am I convinced that it's without problems of its own. For anyone who has to deal with dark secrets of their past however, then I'm sure they will find Joshua's guidance valuable. But when it comes to following his example, this book will not be for everyone.