£8.79
  • RRP: £10.99
  • You Save: £2.20 (20%)
FREE Delivery in the UK on orders over £10.
Only 11 left in stock (more on the way).
Dispatched from and sold by Amazon.
Gift-wrap available.
Quantity:1
Trade in your item
Get a £1.10
Gift Card.
Have one to sell?
Flip to back Flip to front
Listen Playing... Paused   You're listening to a sample of the Audible audio edition.
Learn more
See this image

Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community Paperback – 11 Aug 2001


See all 6 formats and editions Hide other formats and editions
Amazon Price New from Used from
Paperback
"Please retry"
£8.79
£5.10 £1.00
Unknown Binding
"Please retry"

Trade In Promotion


Frequently Bought Together

Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community + Better Together: Restoring the American Community + Social Capital
Price For All Three: £37.24

Buy the selected items together


Trade In this Item for up to £1.10
Trade in Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community for an Amazon Gift Card of up to £1.10, which you can then spend on millions of items across the site. Trade-in values may vary (terms apply). Learn more

Product details

  • Paperback: 544 pages
  • Publisher: Simon & Schuster Ltd; New edition edition (11 Aug 2001)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 0743203046
  • ISBN-13: 978-0743203043
  • Product Dimensions: 14 x 3.3 x 21.4 cm
  • Average Customer Review: 4.6 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (7 customer reviews)
  • Amazon Bestsellers Rank: 37,052 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

More About the Author

Discover books, learn about writers, and more.

Product Description

Amazon Review

Few people outside certain scholarly circles had heard the name Robert D Putnam before 1995. But then this self-described "obscure academic" hit a nerve with a journal article called "Bowling Alone". Suddenly he found himself invited to Camp David, his picture was in People magazine, and his thesis at the centre of a raging debate. In a nutshell, he argued that civil society was breaking down as Americans became more disconnected from their families, neighbours, communities, and the republic itself. The organisations that gave life to democracy were fraying. Bowling became his driving metaphor. Years ago, he wrote, thousands of people belonged to bowling leagues. Today, however, they're more likely to bowl alone:

Television, two-career families, suburban sprawl, generational changes in values--these and other changes in American society have meant that fewer and fewer of us find that the League of Women Voters, or the United Way, or the Shriners, or the monthly bridge club, or even a Sunday picnic with friends fits the way we have come to live. Our growing social-capital deficit threatens educational performance, safe neighbourhoods, equitable tax collection, democratic responsiveness, everyday honesty, and even our health and happiness.
The conclusions reached in Bowling Alone rest on a mountain of data gathered by Putnam and a team of researchers since his original essay appeared. Its breadth of information is astounding--yes, he really has statistics showing people are less likely to take Sunday picnics nowadays. Dozens of charts and graphs track everything from trends in PTA participation to the number of times Americans say they give "the finger" to other drivers each year. If nothing else, Bowling Alone is a fascinating collection of factoids. Yet it does seem to provide an explanation for why "we tell pollsters that we wish we lived in a more civil, more trustworthy, more collectively caring community". What's more, writes Putnam, "Americans are right that the bonds of our communities have withered, and we are right to fear that this transformation has very real costs". Putnam takes a stab at suggesting how things might change, but the book's real strength is in its diagnosis rather than its proposed solutions. Bowling Alone won't make Putnam any less controversial, but it may come to be known as a path-breaking work of scholarship, one whose influence has a long reach into the 21st century. --John J Miller --This text refers to an out of print or unavailable edition of this title.

Review

Julia Keller "Chicago Tribune" A learned and clearly focused snapshot of a crucial moment in American history.

Inside This Book (Learn More)
First Sentence
NO ONE IS LEFT from the Glenn Valley, Pennsylvania, Bridge Club who can tell us precisely when or why the group broke up, even though its forty-odd members were still playing regularly as recently as 1990, just as they had done for more than half a century. Read the first page
Explore More
Concordance
Browse Sample Pages
Front Cover | Copyright | Table of Contents | Excerpt | Index
Search inside this book:

What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?

Customer Reviews

4.6 out of 5 stars
5 star
4
4 star
3
3 star
0
2 star
0
1 star
0
See all 7 customer reviews
Share your thoughts with other customers

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

20 of 20 people found the following review helpful By A Customer on 11 May 2000
Format: Hardcover
This latest book from political scientist Robert Putnam brings together a vast amount of factual information and data charting the decline in what has come to be known as "social capital" in the United States. Although the book is entirely focussed on the United States, the description of how civic engagement as revealed in community involvement, volunteering, voting behaviour and even informal socialising, has declined since the mid-1960s raises questions for non-American readers about whether this may be happening elsewhere and if so whether it matters. In a very clearcut and easy style, Professor Putnam reviews a growing amount of research in the US and beyond which shows that the degree to which individuals and communities are connected to each other makes a significant difference to a range of outcomes including school achievement, health, political democracy and levels of trustworthiness to mention only some - even when other factors such as income, wealth and ethnic conditions are taken into account. Some of the possible reasons for a recent decline in "social capital" are discussed and many of these will sound familiar to readers outside the US - increasing hours at work, TV watching etc. However, the most intriguing aspect is that differences between generations is what counts most. In other words, for the US at least, people born since the 1950s are less inclined to volunteer, vote, join associations and play an active role in networks. Some challenges and possible avenues for "rebuilding civic society" are discussed which will be of vital interest to a wide audience in the US and beyond. For the serious analyst or pundit of data sources and related topics, there is an extensive list of references and data sources.
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
12 of 12 people found the following review helpful By Martin Turner HALL OF FAMETOP 100 REVIEWERVINE VOICE on 3 April 2009
Format: Paperback Verified Purchase
Review the literature on Social Capital, and one name comes to the forefront again and again: Robert Putnam. It is this book which not only established him in the field, but more or less defined the future course of international study. But, although social capital is the central theme of this book, Putnam is less concerned with defining it (he gives at least three differing definitions, that I counted) as with demonstrating that it is not what it used to be.

Pages and pages of graphs all show a similar curve - gently rising from the 1900s, dipping for the Great Depression before rising again, dipping again for the second World War, rising sharply to peak in the sixties, before tumbling to a short plateau in the eighties, and then tumbling relentlessly from then on. This 'Putnam curve' (my words, not his) applies to Parent Teacher Associations, Card playing, civic activity, and, of course, to the rise and fall of league bowling, which is what gives this book its title. The graphs are supported by much reasoning, and by careful exclusion of other factors which might paint a false picture. The result is as compelling as it is far reaching.

Putnam's four factors which he believes contribute to the decline in social capital, or generalised reciprocity, as he at one point puts it, are perhaps less clearly demonstrated than the problem itself. They are: pressures of time and money, suburbanisation (with its commute to work), electronic entertainment (especially the television), and generational change, as more civic generations are replaced by less civic ones.
Read more ›
2 Comments Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
30 of 31 people found the following review helpful By A Customer on 5 Jan 2002
Format: Paperback
This book brilliantly identifies something that most of us were aware of at some level - the fact that the level of social awareness and engagement is dropping in contemporary societies. Where the book is important is in detailed analysis and interpretation of seemingly rock-solid data. The conclusions are difficult to argue with. Television, generational attitudes, urban sprawl and the pressures of work have combined to fragment communities and contribute to an unhealthy level of social isolation.
Don't be put off however by the detailed references to statistical analysis. Putnam is like everybody's favourite lecturer - somebody with the skill to make a potentially dry area of research into hot news that has to be heard and discussed.
This book refers to American societies. Why then should anybody outside of the U.S. read it? Well, try these reasons:
- Certain causes have certain effects no matter where you are. Extra commuting time, for example, will always lead to less community time.
- Many Western societies are either evolving towards an American model or at least have the potential to do so. Those of us outside of the U.S have a chance to make things different.
- Reading Putnam's discussions of the ill effects of lack of community would lead one to suppose that this too could be at the root of some problems worldwide. These surveys need to be conducted anywhere that concern exists for the preservation of community structures.
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
2 of 2 people found the following review helpful By Harm Hilvers on 12 Sep 2011
Format: Paperback Verified Purchase
Much has been written about the social climate of Western countries, but - although I have not read everything I feel safe enough to say that - almost none of that is as good, well-researched, extensive and clear as the work of Robert D. Putnam in this book. The book is very well structured: it simply follows the adagium of: what is the problem, why is this happening, is the problem really a problem and finally some lessons to be learned. Each of these sections is littered with good questions, nice clarifying phrases, helpful graphs and insightful tables.

The problem, according to Putnam, is as follows: since the 1950s and the 1960s society - at least in America - has changed, people experience less of the community around them and are also less active within that community. Basically, he sees a few causes for this change: pressures of time and money, more mobility and greater urbanization, the rise and influence of technology and mass media, and finally he concludes that there are real differences between the pre- and post-WWII-generation. In chapter 15 Putnam even goes so far as putting some percentages on these causes, explicitly leaving room for other contributors to the aforementioned changes in society and civic engagement.

I like this way of reasoning, because it sheds light on the causes that led can be shed on, the things that definitely have been contributors to the changes he describes. On the other hand, it leaves enough room for other explanations, relating for example to the individual or to local changes--society is quite locally-bound and influenced.

His two final chapters are not as strong as the previous ones.
Read more ›
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again


Feedback