- Paperback: 260 pages
- Publisher: American Mathematical Society; illustrated edition edition (20 July 2006)
- Language English
- ISBN-10: 0821839675
- ISBN-13: 978-0821839676
- Product Dimensions: 24.4 x 18 x 1 cm
- Amazon Bestsellers Rank: 1,604,890 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
Did you know you can trade in your old books for an Amazon.co.uk Gift Card to spend on the things you want? Plus, get an extra £5 Gift Certificate when you trade in books worth £10 or more before June 30, 2012. Visit the Books Trade-In Store for more details. |
Product details |
More About the Author
Product Description
Product Description
The name Bourbaki is known to every mathematician. Many also know something of the origins of Bourbaki, yet few know the full story. In 1935, a small group of young mathematicians in France decided to write a fundamental treatise on analysis to replace the standard texts of the time. They ended up writing the most influential and sweeping mathematical treatise of the twentieth century, Les elements de mathematique. Maurice Mashaal lifts the veil from this secret society, showing us how heated debates, schoolboy humor, and the devotion and hard work of the members produced the ten books that took them over sixty years to write. The book has many first-hand accounts of the origins of Bourbaki, their meetings, their seminars, and the members themselves. He also discusses the lasting influence that Bourbaki has had on mathematics, through both the Elements and the Seminaires. The book is illustrated with numerous remarkable photographs.
Inside This Book
(Learn More)
First Sentence
On December 10, 1934, a handful of young mathematicians gathered in a cafe in the Latin Quarter of Paris. Read the first page
Front Cover | Copyright | Table of Contents | Excerpt | Back Cover
On December 10, 1934, a handful of young mathematicians gathered in a cafe in the Latin Quarter of Paris. Read the first page
Explore More
Concordance
Browse Sample PagesConcordance
Front Cover | Copyright | Table of Contents | Excerpt | Back Cover
Tag this product(What's this?)Think of a tag as a keyword or label you consider is strongly related to this product.
Tags will help all customers organise and find favourite items. |
Sell a Digital Version of This Book in the Kindle Store
If you are a publisher or author and hold the digital rights to a book, you can sell a digital version of it in our Kindle Store.
Learn more
Customer Reviews
There are no customer reviews yet on Amazon.co.uk.
5 star
4 star
3 star
2 star
1 star
Most Helpful Customer Reviews on Amazon.com (beta)
Amazon.com:
3 reviews
9 of 9 people found the following review helpful
Balanced overview of rebarbative biographees
1 Nov 2009
Format:Paperback
This is a very solid overview of the Bourbaki school, though obviously nothing like a full-fledged biography or monograph. The treatment is slightly more sophisticated than what you might find in a series of Scientific American articles (e.g., the author is confident that readers won't be scared off by an occasional integral sign or 2x2 matrix). I read the French edition, so I can't comment on the translation, though I was abashed to learn that the French adjectival form is not "bourbakien," as I might have guessed, but "bourbachique".
One of the main virtues of the book is that it's frank enough to include many thoughtful criticisms of the Bourbaki style and content. For example, although the Bourbaki were dedicated to following an axiomatic method, they ignored Gödel's incompleteness theorem, aside from an occasional dismissive reference. (That theorem shows that if you start from a system of axioms, you can't deduce all "mathematical truths" from them -- i.e., you can run across some statements that are consistent with the axioms but that cannot be deduced from them). The Bourbaki also ignored category theory, even though one of its inventors (Samuel Eilenberg) was a member of the group for a while. Today category theory is the dominant framework for describing the fundamental structures of mathematics. The Bourbaki also disdained so-called applied mathematics, including probability theory and dynamics, for its lack of "purity," even though it has yielded much mathematical fruit in the past 50 years. (Indeed it represents much of the lasting glory of French mathematics, e.g. the work of Fourier, Legendre, Lebesgue, Henri Poincaré and even Jacques Hadamard, whose seminars were a role model for the Bourbakis' and who supervised the PhDs of two of the group's founding members.) In short, the Bourbaki seem to have ignored or disdained rather lots of stuff. The bourbachique closed-mindedness ultimately contributed to the obsolescence of their approach.
The book's candor is also a bit of a flaw. By the end of the book the members of the group come across as the dogmatic, elitist clique their contemporaries accused them of being. They do seem to have been a livelier bunch in person than what I'd expected from their impersonal, austere, diagram-less presentation of mathematics. But while having a sense of humor was a prerequisite for being invited to join, the examples of their humor are for the most part sophomoric, and occasionally mean-spirited. Readers who already weren't Bourbaki fans might feel vindicated after reading this book; I can't vouch for what their fans might feel. Overall a quite interesting, but not uplifting, brief intellectual biography.
One of the main virtues of the book is that it's frank enough to include many thoughtful criticisms of the Bourbaki style and content. For example, although the Bourbaki were dedicated to following an axiomatic method, they ignored Gödel's incompleteness theorem, aside from an occasional dismissive reference. (That theorem shows that if you start from a system of axioms, you can't deduce all "mathematical truths" from them -- i.e., you can run across some statements that are consistent with the axioms but that cannot be deduced from them). The Bourbaki also ignored category theory, even though one of its inventors (Samuel Eilenberg) was a member of the group for a while. Today category theory is the dominant framework for describing the fundamental structures of mathematics. The Bourbaki also disdained so-called applied mathematics, including probability theory and dynamics, for its lack of "purity," even though it has yielded much mathematical fruit in the past 50 years. (Indeed it represents much of the lasting glory of French mathematics, e.g. the work of Fourier, Legendre, Lebesgue, Henri Poincaré and even Jacques Hadamard, whose seminars were a role model for the Bourbakis' and who supervised the PhDs of two of the group's founding members.) In short, the Bourbaki seem to have ignored or disdained rather lots of stuff. The bourbachique closed-mindedness ultimately contributed to the obsolescence of their approach.
The book's candor is also a bit of a flaw. By the end of the book the members of the group come across as the dogmatic, elitist clique their contemporaries accused them of being. They do seem to have been a livelier bunch in person than what I'd expected from their impersonal, austere, diagram-less presentation of mathematics. But while having a sense of humor was a prerequisite for being invited to join, the examples of their humor are for the most part sophomoric, and occasionally mean-spirited. Readers who already weren't Bourbaki fans might feel vindicated after reading this book; I can't vouch for what their fans might feel. Overall a quite interesting, but not uplifting, brief intellectual biography.
8 of 9 people found the following review helpful
Interesting for fans of Bourbaki's texts
17 Sep 2007
Format:Paperback
This is very interesting for fans of any of Bourbaki's mathematics texts. It has photos of many of the members taken at their meetings, and information about how the group operated. You'd never know it from the final product, but their original goal was to write a calculus book! Several of the founding members had just begun teaching, and they were unhappy with the standard French calculus text of the day--a multivolume work by Goursat that they considered out of date. They decided to write a little bit of background material on algebra and general topology, and somehow ended up with the books we all know and love.
The book also describes the personality quirks of the members, and has some commentary on the contents of the various texts of Bourbaki. It doesn't explain technical details like why Bourbaki chose to define integrals the way they did.
If you didn't major in math, this book probably won't interest you.
The book also describes the personality quirks of the members, and has some commentary on the contents of the various texts of Bourbaki. It doesn't explain technical details like why Bourbaki chose to define integrals the way they did.
If you didn't major in math, this book probably won't interest you.
1 of 12 people found the following review helpful
Despite Obvious Flaws, it's a colorful book, providing a clear look at rather common mathematical values and beliefs
5 Mar 2008
Format:Paperback
For values and beliefs for a large group of mathematicians, this is a helpful book. For Bourbakian values and beliefs have been, by and large, adopted by the academic masses, alas. (expression of a Bourbakian value and a Bourbakian belief from p.75 "basic concepts are treated as abstract entities whose nature and concrete meaning are insignificant") Still, it's a nice tourist guide, even has lots and lots of color snaps.
But the text just reads and feels odd. It might just be due to some weaknesses in the text's translation from the French. All the same, sometimes I have no idea what is being written about or why.
For example, on page 41 I read "the fundamental theorem of algebra, which states that any polynomial with real coefficients has at least one complex root (in other words, there is a complex numer x that makes the expression equal to zero)" WHAT?!?!?!?!?!?! Not only useless, it's nonsense. The basic thought on complex numbers and polynomials with real-valued coefficients is the following. If any polynomial equation with real coefficients has a complex number z as a root, then the complex conjugate of z is also a root of the polynomial equation.
But the text just reads and feels odd. It might just be due to some weaknesses in the text's translation from the French. All the same, sometimes I have no idea what is being written about or why.
For example, on page 41 I read "the fundamental theorem of algebra, which states that any polynomial with real coefficients has at least one complex root (in other words, there is a complex numer x that makes the expression equal to zero)" WHAT?!?!?!?!?!?! Not only useless, it's nonsense. The basic thought on complex numbers and polynomials with real-valued coefficients is the following. If any polynomial equation with real coefficients has a complex number z as a root, then the complex conjugate of z is also a root of the polynomial equation.
Were these reviews helpful?
Let us know
Customer Discussions
|
This product's forum
Active discussions in related forums
Search Customer Discussions
|
Related forums
|
Listmania!
Look for similar items by category
- Books > Biography > Historical > Countries & Regions > France
- Books > Biography > Medical, Legal & Social Sciences > Philosophy
- Books > Biography > Science, Mathematics & Technology > Science
- Books > History > Other Historical Subjects > History of Science
- Books > Science & Nature > History & Philosophy > History of Mathematics
- Books > Science & Nature > History & Philosophy > Reference
- Books > Science & Nature > Mathematics > History of Mathematics
- Books > Science & Nature > Mathematics > Philosophy of Mathematics
- Books > Science & Nature > Mathematics > Reference
- Books > Science & Nature > Popular Science > Maths
- Books > Scientific, Technical & Medical
- Books > Society, Politics & Philosophy > Philosophy
Look for similar items by subject
Feedback
- Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images?
- I am the Author, and I want to comment on my book.
- I am the Publisher, and I want to comment on this book.
|
