Most Helpful Customer Reviews
|
|
4 of 4 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars
The Death of Hannibal, 22 Feb 2009
There's a difference of opinion about the location of Hannibal's death. Historians (and the Roman emperor Septimus Severus) think he died in Asia Minor. John Waite thinks he died in Britannia...
"Even Rome's greatest nemesis, Hannibal, was hounded to suicide as an old man, when the relentless pursuit finally came to an end and Roman troops discovered his final hiding place in Britannia." (page 194)
As for the rest of the book, it's a morass of conjecture and hypothesis, with the 'would's', 'could's' and 'may have's' piling up in default of any reasoned analysis. Waite's identification of High Cross as the site of the "Last Stand" is based on his proposal that Smockington Hollow is the defile of Tacitus' account, and on archaeological evidence of marching camps and defensive ditches close by. That's it. I can understand that Paulinus and his troops might have legged it down from Mancetter and stopped at the first defile they found, but his explanation of why Boudica's host headed for the same spot appears to rest on a supposed "baiting of a trap" (p.165)- a deliberate policy of killing some "peaceful folk", but not all, with the survivors begging Boudica to come to their aid. I'm not sure of Waite's evidence for this- "fast moving cavalry parties could have ridden out...and ravaged" "the soldiers would have executed their task with brutal efficiency" "Paulinus would have been confident...that a number of the local civilians would be deliberately spared". All conjecture- no citations, no footnotes, no evidence that some historians other than Waite think that this may have happened.
Well it could have... The aged Carthaginian general mounts his elephant, and rides disconsolately across the British countryside.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you?
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 of 6 people found the following review helpful:
2.0 out of 5 stars
Unconvincing, 24 Feb 2009
I wondered if I really needed yet another conjectural account of this episode based on the scanty and perhaps dubious literary evidence of Tacitus and Dio. Thus I found myself agreeing wholeheartedly with the author's opening chapter in which he effectively expresses more or less the same sentiments. Nevertheless, he then proceeds to do just that ...!
At the core of Waite's reconstruction is a pair of hypotheses: that Boudica's revolt was not merely a simple act of revenge that took on a life of its own, but was premeditated, a carefully considered strategy that had a number of crucial goals; the site of her final battle was not at Mancetter, as is often quoted, but a few miles away at High Cross where the Fosse Way crosses Watling Street.
Sadly, Waite avoids inclusion of any sources or footnotes, an omission which seriously undermines his credibility. Unsubstantiated probability, or even possibility, dressed as fact is often a bugbear of this type of book and there are many examples, particularly in the early chapters, where Waite falls into this trap (Antedios is a name found only on Icenian coins, yet here he acquires some 'history')!
Waite often makes heavy weather of his arguments, exhibiting a tendency toward laboured verbosity and repetition, though his flowing style is easily digested by non-academics like me who, presumably, comprise his target audience. I found 'Boudica's Last Stand' to be interesting in places, but ultimately he takes too many liberties with the known facts and my credulity.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you?
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 of 7 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Thoughtful, well written, 24 Jun 2007
Waite has pulled together many strands of the story of Boudica - from popular myth and hollywood, to classical sources and archaeology. By exploring these ideas in detail, he explains the origins of the myths, and how they differ from the reality (at least as it is understood so far).
Admitting that he doesn't have definitive answers - and in fact that there may never be any - he looks at the central protagonists, both native and Roman, and then explores in detail what is perhaps Boudica's most intriguing mystery, the location of her final battle. Many other writers have done this, and there are numerous suggestions for this lost battle site, but Waite's new site is an interesting suggestion.
Again he does not claim definitively that this is the answer, only offering a new possible solution, but he does offer some compelling reasons why the commonly accepted site - Mancetter - is unlikely to be the actual one.
The book is well written, and Waite's style is easy to read, and entertaining. The two main classical sources about Boudica, Dio and Tacitus, both regularly include speeches from their central characters that could not in any way have been accurately recorded and passed down, such as Boudica talking to her troops before a battle. This literary device helped humanise the protagonists to the audience, as well as providing "juicy" details to entertain the reader. Waite uses the same device in his colourful, emotive, and sometimes horrific descriptions of battles. He does not pretend that they are definitively accurate, but they are plausible, and they help immerse the audience into the story, and make this a unique re-examination of the story of Boudica.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Most Recent Customer Reviews
|