Buy Used
£25.00
+ £2.80 UK delivery
Used: Very Good | Details
Condition: Used: Very Good
Comment: All proceeds go to CHARITY. A fascinating history of the makers of Bookbinding Tools. Cover has some light markings on front and back, its corners worn incredibly slightly. With the exception of very few inscriptions, pages themselves immaculate and crisp.
Have one to sell?
Flip to back Flip to front
Listen Playing... Paused   You're listening to a sample of the Audible audio edition.
Learn more
See all 2 images

Bookbinder's Finishing Tool Makers 1780-1965 Hardcover – 4 Jul 2002


See all 2 formats and editions Hide other formats and editions
Amazon Price New from Used from
Hardcover, 4 Jul 2002
£75.27 £25.00


Product details

  • Hardcover: 315 pages
  • Publisher: Plough Press; 1st ed edition (4 July 2002)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 0902813161
  • ISBN-13: 978-0902813168
  • Product Dimensions: 28 x 22.2 x 2.8 cm
  • Average Customer Review: 5.0 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (1 customer review)
  • Amazon Bestsellers Rank: 2,723,815 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

More About the Author

Discover books, learn about writers, and more.

Customer Reviews

5.0 out of 5 stars
5 star
1
4 star
0
3 star
0
2 star
0
1 star
0
See the customer review
Share your thoughts with other customers

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

2 of 2 people found the following review helpful By N. Tasker on 13 Oct. 2009
Format: Hardcover
A piece of loving research into the makers of brass tools used by bookbinders since the 18th century, in extraordinary historical detail. Covers British, European and American makers, with soot prints of touchmarks.
The book itself is splendidly printed and bound, a pleasant rarity in these days when so-called 'hard cover' editions are frequently no more than an unsewn glue-bound paperback with inadequately attached boards. This volume is a pleasure both to read and to handle.
Nigel Tasker, Bristol
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again


Feedback