| ||||||||||||||||||||
![]() Trade In this Item for up to £3.05
Trade in Blending Genders: Social Aspects of Cross-Dressing and Sex Changing for an Amazon.co.uk gift card of up to £3.05, which you can then spend on millions of items across the site. Trade-in values may vary (terms apply). Find more products eligible for trade-in.
|
Product details
|
Suggested Tags from Similar Products(What's this?)Be the first one to add a relevant tag (keyword that's strongly related to this product)
|
|
Share your thoughts with other customers:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
8 of 8 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
A must-read for all interested in gender roles and identity,
By A Customer
This review is from: Blending Genders: Social Aspects of Cross-Dressing and Sex Changing (Hardcover)
This is a book about the various shades of people who shift between our society's gender role boundaries. It is a collection of papers by fifteen contributors, drawn together by commentaries by the authors.Transsexuals are prone to tell you that "They are quite different from transvestites", but when you ask how, they become vague, and their answers seem less than believable. Perhaps the first part of this book will give some clues, contrasting the stories told by cross-dressers in the early part of this century, as role play, with the personal experience of one, Mark Rees, who has crossed the gender boundary permanently, as role identification. In so doing the book reflects the stereotypes of that one is either a "man dressing up" (a transvestite) or was "always really a woman" (a transsexual) - or in the case of Mark Rees - a man. Because of this, the next section describing a 'career path' may seem at first sight contradictory. Perhaps, because for Mark, his feelings were clear early in childhood, the stages were collapsed into a very short time frame, or perhaps they never happened. Neverthe less, for Farrer's cross-dressers in the first paper, the experience was clearly more than a transitory erotic event. They spent whole days and weeks in the opposite role, reminiscent of Hirschfeld's transvestites. Hence Ekin's third section fills in the void - that large body of people, who are genuinely 'in between', sometimes referred to as Dual Role Transvestites. The second part of the book, The Social Organisation, describes the ghettoes which our culture grudgingly sets aside for those who are outside its rules, King's Cross in London, the Porchester Balls and a 'heterosexual transvestite' club. Even today there are people living, undetected, in the 'opposite role', and have done so for much of their lives, without thought of medication or surgery. Yet psychiatry has a history of 'normalising' those who are 'deviant'. The third paper in this section follows the history of medical practice, while the fourth paper is highly critical of the surgical/medical path though it seems natural, in this technological age, to seek an engineering solution to a problem). This fourth paper provides an astringent counterpoint to the rest of the book, yet it will hardly be comfortable reading for many. The third part of the book reviews the treatment of gender crossing by the media. Firstly in literature, not only in popular women's and other magazines, but in works by Mark Twain, Rudyard Kipling and Conan Doyle, and in children's books. This is followed by the view portrayed by the media, and finally the variety of telephone premium rate lines. A survey of the Internet will no doubt follow in the future. It intrigues me that, with the anonymity afforded by the net, people feel able to label themselves 'sissy boys.' The fourth and final section approaches gender, or rather, transgender, politics. One of the bete noires of the 'conventional' transsexual world is Janice Raymond, and the section begins with a detailed response to her book, The Transsexual Empire. The final paper is by the author herself, notable because she finally admits that there are women changing over to men, though she labels them 'transgendered lesbians'. In between these, there are two papers. One challenges the relationship of mtf transsexuals to real women, and the other challenges the conflation of homosexual and transgender politics and history. As I have said, this book may make uncomfortable reading for many, but it contains the thought-provoking ideas of a wide range of writers, and contains many questions that need to be asked.
Share your thoughts with other customers: Create your own review
Most Helpful Customer Reviews on Amazon.com (beta) Amazon.com:
4.0 out of 5 stars (2 customer reviews) 2 of 2 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Professional and scholarly articles are the focus,
By TammyJo Eckhart "TammyJo Eckhart" - Published on Amazon.com
This review is from: Blending Genders: Social Aspects of Cross-Dressing and Sex Changing (Paperback)
This is a more academic collection than many others discussing transgender and transexual issues. Thirteen researchers and activists have contributed to this book. Usually their biases are clearly stated up front and for the most part the evidence is also well presented. As in most academic articles the reader may be surprised by the personal focus and "attacks" in some of the articles -- sadly this is all too common in many of the social and medicial sciences. Not geared toward the average reader; having a good grasp of social or psychological theory plus some experience in college level analysis is practically a must to get the most from this book.
6 of 9 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
A primarily psychoanalytic and somewhat disappointing book,
By A Customer - Published on Amazon.com
This review is from: Blending Genders: Social Aspects of Cross-Dressing and Sex Changing (Paperback)
Although it covers a broad spectrum of experience (if from a somewhat limited viewpoint) I expected a lot more from a book that has Stephen Whittleand Janice Raymond contributing adjacent chapters. Thecore of the book is a debate about the historical construct- ion of "transgender" and its legitimacy in modern culture. The arguments against, with the exception of Raymond's revised introduction to the Transsexual Empire (1994), seem to predate the emergence of "transgender" as a term, and thus don't address any of the cultural developments that have sprung up around it. Furthermore, as psychoanalysts predominate, there is an annoying tendency for essays to treat transgendered subjectivity as a source only for raw data, and not a legitimate independent critical voice.
|
|
|
This product's forum
Active discussions in related forums
Search Customer Discussions
|
Related forums
|
|