Blair [Hardcover]

Seldon has developed an interesting and fresh approach for this biography of Blair - and much comment has been passed about his approach of alternating between the twenty most important events of his life and the twenty figures to have had the greatest impact. This allows the reader to determine where Blair drew his influences from - indeed he appears to be uniquely ungrounded for a politician and has drawn much strength and many ideas from people around him.

Seldon's main argument is that Blair has achieved little domestically in the UK because he failed to develop a detailed agenda for a number of reasons - not wanting to be hostage to fortune whilst in Opposition, a lack of time for preparation whilst in office, and perhaps most importantly road-blocking by Gordon Brown. Blair, and his colleagues it has to be said, have remarkably little experience of running any large organisation. At first glance this does not appear to bode well for Cameron, should he be elected at the next election.

The book is effective in dispelling a number of myths that have grown up around Blair. The most prominent is that he stole Brown's rightful crown - it is easy to forget that Blair carried much more popularity in the country. It is also easy to forget how much of a modernizing role Brown has played within the recent history of the Labour Party. The second is that he has no real political philosophy. Whilst it is true that he has done much to accommodate Thatcherism, he has always had a fundamental belief in community, even if he has failed to successfully translate that into policy.

The third, and the aspect of the book that I found to be most interesting was that on his relationship with Bill Clinton. Bush is often accused of having had a poor effect on UK foreign policy, but Clinton was similarly disinterested in payback for support from the UK. The question regarding UK-US relations therefore ought not to be "why did Blair fail to extract anything in return from Bush" but "why has Blair failed to extract anything from the Americans." Whilst a Gore Presidency would have been more sympathetic to the goals of the Blair Government, especially on the issue of Kyoto, they might not necessarily have been more open to Blair on other issues - the actions of Clinton on the Northern Ireland Peace Process is a case in point.

Seldon write clearly and if his conclusions appear rather vague, that is only a reflection of the difficulty in finding a concrete legacy for Blair after nine years in office. Blair is definitely worth a read for anyone interested in British politics.

As Anthony Seldon Himself admits, this is not a conventional biography. It's certainly not a womb-to-tomb chronological record, nor is it one of those ubiquitous hagiographies written by a friendly journalist or party hack. Rather it is a critical and analytical study in political communication, although Seldon himself seems scarcely aware of this.

He has presented us with 700 pages of text organised into 40 chapters. They deal with twenty episodes and 20 people who are important in Blair's life. If you think it odd for a text to run to exactly 700 pages, then you may think it odder that all the episode chapters are assigned odd numbers and are presented chronologically. Those chapters ending in seven present Blair at his boldest. Clearly the number seven is important to Seldon and so are multiples of ten, for he presents the political backbone of his book in Chapters 10, 20, 30 and 40.

The reader will quickly forget this obsessive-compulsive concern with numbers because within a few pages he will be completely involved in an extraordinarily dense but very clear poltical narrative fleshed out with incisive analysis. We watch a bright boy acquire an Oxford education, become a barrister, marry another barrister and, comparatively late in life, become interested in politics.

It is at this point that an interesting "life" becomes an absorbing account of how politics is communicated in a complex democratic society. As we are introduced to such influentials in Blair's life as Neil Kinnock, Philip Gould, Peter Mandelson, Derry Irvine, Roy Jenkins and Alastair Campbell, we are treated to impressively detailed accounts of their interaction with Blair, the political system and with each other. In the episode chapters we are treated to an even greater density of detail as we get the inside stories of such issues as Clause IV, the death of Diana, the Euro decision and Kosovo. In all cases we get detached, detailed and balanced accounts of the roles of the political actors and their interaction with the institutions of British democracy.

How is it possible to be so detailed, so knowing, in accounts of events that are so recent, many of them events shaped in secret interactions, indeed in the interactions of a small group of politicians who gathered privately in the prime minister's office (his "den-ocracy")? The answer should warm the heart of any journalist: 90 per cent of the material was gathered in 600 interviews conducted in all political "camps" and in many countries. Many of the interviewees have obviously "spilled their guts" to Seldon and his three researchers. He himself has woven the material together for the most part seamlessly, although more raggedly in his chapter on recent events.

The unconventional structure mostly works well, except for one major misjudgment. As you read the early chapters you slowly become aware that the key figure in Blair's political life is Gordon Brown. His economic acumen sustains Blair but his jealousy and rivalry both undermines and constrains the prime minister. The portrait of Brown, however, is banished to the last chapter. About one-third of the way through the text I realised I had to know much more about him than had been revealed, so I turned to Chapter 40 and read the Brown profile. Much of the narrative then fell into place or took on new meaning. In the next edition Brown must be relocated to around about Chapter 10.

Anthony Seldon clearly sees his role as being to reveal the many aspects of a multi-faceted personality: Who are the people who have most influenced Blair? What have been the main turning points in the prime minister's life? What are his motivations? How has power changed him? And so on.

But in doing so Seldon produces a superb study in the processes of political communication, even though he seems scarcely aware of the conceptual bases of those processes. There is certainly no political science theory underpinning his account, although there is plenty of incisive commonsense critical analysis of both people and events.

The one major omission from what is the conventional political commnunication framework is the influence of pressure groups on Blair and his government. The unions and one or two other groups get a mention but surely in such a complex and sophisticated political system as Britain's the prime minister must be the focus daily of a wide variety of pressure groups. Certainly most of his key influentials would be.

I found this book utterly absorbing - once I started reading it I couldn't keep away from it. Rarely do we get such a balanced, detailed account of the processes of a government while the government is still in power. There will be more to come, of course, as the insiders' diaries and personal accounts are published, but meanwhile we have far more than we could reasonably expect. Why is it so difficult to find reviews of such an outstanding book?

This is a comprehensively researched book by an experienced political historian. For those who want to know, he gives a revealing portrait of Blair's family and his psychological and political development. It thoroughly goes into the evolution of the Labour party from Blair's arrival in Parliament in 1983 under Kinnock, Smith and Blair himself. The influence of Brown, Mandelson and many other figures in this process is detailed.

Then we get a fascinating picture of Blair's philosophy, political agenda - Seldon makes a convincing case that it was consciously Thatcherite - style, and organising ability in power. A clear picture is given of how the Labour party changed and how Blair altered structures of government, lately apparently more and more in a frantic effort to correct what he thought was going wrong. There is also a detailed analysis of Blair's relationships with Brown, Campbell, Mandelson and many others not to mention the press and the civil service.

Finally of course we get what seems like a balanced view of Blair's agenda over Iraq which to me ends up being whatever else it was an expression of his choirboy personality. For anyone who has been really puzzled as to why Blair committed himself to the war I think this book will help them understand.