I've just finished reading "Bitter Fame" by Anne Stevenson. It was a struggle, but I persisted because the good side of this book is its comprehensive marshalling of the facts about her life. Stevenson has done her research, and the description of the details of Sylvia Plath's life is well done. But it was a struggle, nonetheless, because Stevenson writes with a clear agenda in mind, which is that all of Sylvia Plath's problems, all of the tragedy of her life, was her fault and hers alone. The language is sodden with damning judgement, no detail is completely described without a negative connotation concerning Plath. In the end, it became wearisome, so much so that the book, in my view, fails its purpose, to isolate the blame for Plath's suffering and suicide to Plath herself, because the endless blame game provokes a reactionary response, a sympathy for Plath.
A secondary, related misson for this book is to exonerate Hughes of any responsibility for his wife's death. In order to achieve this, Stevenson simply leaves him out of much of the latter stages of Plath's life. He becomes like a ghost or a vague shadow, his name popping up in connection with some inconsequenteial detail here and there. There is one section, though, that is puzzling, as far as I'm concerned. When Plath and Hughes are living in Devon, at the start of the summer they split up, the Wevills visit them for a weekend. Stevenson relates an occasion when Assia Wevill is in the kitchen at the back of the house alone with Hughes. Sylvia, entering the front of the house, slips off her shoes and quietly approaches the kitchen to observe them. After that point, her manner towards Assia hardens. Stevenson writes that, in the view of those close to Hughes, if Plath had behaved differently on this occasion, Hughes and Wevill might never have had an affair. A couple of pages and a little time later, quite out of the blue, Stevenson relates that it was at this point in time that Hughes first made contact with Wevill. The whole episode begs some very large questions - for example, if nothing was going on between Wevill and Hughes, and Sylvia was just paranoid, was Hughes starting an affair to spite her? Or was there a real attraction between Hughes and a woman on her third marriage already? Stevenson obviously has to mention the event, because of its importance to the breakdown of Plath's and Hughes marriage, but, desparate as she is to absolve Hughes, has to gloss over the details and leave these questions unanswered.
So, to sum up, read it for the factual and chronological detail, but read it carefully and be aware of the book's ultimate purpose.