Most books by politicians should be put into that odd category half way between fact and fiction. Although they make some claim to historical accuracy, their main aim is to present their author's case for the defence. Be warned: Gordon Brown has taken this to absurd lengths in 'Beyond the Crash.'
Even the title is misleading. 2008-10 was not the first crisis of globalisation: that was in 1929, when the Wall Street Crash led to the great depression. It was not even a global crisis anyway - the 'new' BRIC economies (Brazil, Russia, India, China) largely continued to grow, as did most of the 'old' economies too: Canada, Australia, Germany, most of non-eurozone Europe, etc. The UK was, in truth, one of the relatively few countries to get caught out.
So, why did that happen? Well, according to Brown, it was all the fault of the banks. They lent money on high-risk ventures and didn't tell Brown what they were doing. And that's it; the defence rests its case. 300 pages of charmless, densely-written verbiage can be distilled into three words: 'not me, guv!'
Brown doesn't mention, of course, that it was his job to find out what the banks were doing. But then again he doesn't mention a lot of things. For example, here are some of the things that Brown DOESN'T think caused the UK economy to come within 48 hours (as he claims at one point) of collapse: running a deficit every year from 2002; public spending reaching 50% of GDP; a reliance on the City to pay almost all the country's bills; a national debt that accounts for 25% of GDP in interest payments; incentive-destroying taxation; the creation of a welfare-dependent client state; the destruction of private sector pensions; his decision to replace a banking regulatory system that had worked for 300 years with his own 'light touch' version that failed immediately; 13 years of treating the UK economy as a short-term way of buying Labour votes with pork-barrel spending (particularly in Scotland and Wales) rather than as the long-term engine for national success.
I could go on, but you get the picture. None of the above gets mentioned; not even to allow him to defend them or to explain why he thought they were a good idea at the time. Brown's culpability for the near-collapse of the economy is air-brushed out of this 'history' as completely as he seems to have air-brushed it out of his own mind. Instead, we get the well-worn spin of how Brown saved the world from financial meltdown by coming up with the idea (on a plane back from Washington, or so he claims) of recapitalising the banks. Except, of course, that he didn't; all he did was copy the Swedish government's response, up-scale it and claim to have invented it himself. As a short-term expedient it was as good as any other (although it has ultimately saddled the taxpayers with a £1.3 trillion debt); as a long-term solution it was quietly abandoned within weeks of being announced at the G20 Summit in London in 2009.
So, even by the usual standards of a politician's book, 'Beyond the Crash' is partisan and self-serving - a cheap, dishonest little book written by a cheap, dishonest little man. At least in their memoirs Major, Thatcher and Blair admit to making mistakes; furthermore, they all recognise how the Law of Unintended Consequences acted on their Premierships. But not Brown. Not even once. The only version of events he wants us to believe is the one in which he was right and everybody else was wrong, every time. It was all the iceberg's fault for crashing into the Titanic; the Captain says so himself. (And, incidentally, talking of Blair, he's mentioned only once in passing while Mandelson - Brown's Business Secretary and effectively the Deputy PM throughout all of this - doesn't get a mention at all. Not only did Brown save the world, he did it single-handed!)
As I said at the start, most books by politicians fall between fact and fiction. 'Beyond the Crash', however, plays so fast and loose with the truth that it should be filed under 'Fantasy'.
PS. I ought to say a bit about Brown's prose style. Well, it's not as bad as his handling of the economy but he's no writer. Think of him announcing the latest tractor production statistics to the Kirkaldy and Cowdenbeath Chamber of Commerce and you'll get the idea.