| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() Trade In this Item for up to £10.60
Trade in Korea Between Empires (Studies of the East Asian Institute (Columbia Paperback)) for an Amazon.co.uk gift card of up to £10.60, which you can then spend on millions of items across the site. Plus, get an extra £5 when you trade in books worth £10 or more until June 30, 2012. Trade-in values may vary (terms apply). Find more products eligible for trade-in.
|
Product details
|
Tag this product(What's this?)Think of a tag as a keyword or label you consider is strongly related to this product.
Tags will help all customers organise and find favourite items. |
For example, by his own admission, Schmid's book is elitist with his focus on the educated elite who could read newspapers written in a hybrid Chinese/vernacular script. It is fine to focus on the elite, but Schmid fails to articulate how popular conceptions of the nation affected the theories of the elite. Schmid's book is inherently dogged by binaries such as elite/non-elite and colonial/non-colonial, despite his claim to overcome them. At the end, we are left with a sense that the newspaper editors, who wrote in the presence of Japan's "civilization and enlightenment", were wholly responsible for the formation of Korean national identity. I feel this reading gives too much priority to the Japanese presence and also leaves us stuck in the traditional mentality that Koreans simply reacted to Japan.
In all fairness, Schmid does illustrate examples from the past (such as the 1712 Kando incident) to suggest that there were people who began to conceive of the nation long before Meiji Japan. However, he tends to anacronistically imbue these events with more significance than they apparently warrented in their time. He also fails to draw a conclusive link between pre-Meiji nationalist ventures and the newspapers of the Patriotic Enlightenment Movement.
In all, this book is a valuable contribution to the field, but it's narrow focus on newspapers does weaken his overall argument. He should have stuck with an analysis of newspapers, which he explores so elegantly, and not have tried to describe Korean nationalism in its totality.
|
This product's forum
Active discussions in related forums
Search Customer Discussions
|
Related forums
|
|