The following review was written by Oscar Ross and published in 'The Sherlock Holmes Society Journal' (Vol. 29, No. 1, p. 37, Winter 2008):
Bertram Fletcher Robinson: A Footnote to The Hound of the Baskervilles by Brian W Pugh and Paul R Spiring. MX Publishing 2008. xii + 234 pp. £18.99 (Hardback).
- Fletcher Robinson. Until relatively recently he was an almost forgotten figure, except that is by the Doylean and Holmesian fraternity. Yet even among people like us knowledge of him has been patchy to say the least.
Fortunately a remedy is now to hand, and there can be no excuse for continuing ignorance on the subject. Fresh from their success with 'On the trail of Arthur Conan Doyle: An Illustrated Devon Tour', Brian Pugh and Paul Spiring have written a full-scale biography of Fletcher Robinson. Being first in their field allows the authors a virtual blank canvas for their word painting, and this they use to no little effect.
Family background, early years, schooling, university, amateur sporting prowess (e.g. a triple blue for rugby), all are extensively detailed. Then there are his considerable journalistic achievements, among them were editorships of well-known publications including 'Vanity Fair' and the recently launched 'Daily Express'. Robinson was no mean wordsmith either: three quarters of a million of them between 1892 and 1907, according to the book. His forte was short stories and two of his published collections were detective fiction, 'The Chronicles of Addington Peace' being the better known.
But most readers will be inexorably drawn to chapter 6 and beyond. Without the authorship controversy (Chapter 11) surrounding what has become known as Doyle's greatest literary legacy, I doubt if this biography would have been published. The ink was barely dry on the pages of 'The Hound of the Baskervilles' when the accusations started to fly. These are succinctly dealt with in turn. The American literary magazine 'The Bookman' was at the forefront of the controversy, claiming that "the story is almost entirely Mr Robinson's and that Dr Doyle's only important contribution to the partnership is the permission to use the character of Sherlock Holmes".
However, the most serious allegations surfaced in recent times. In addition to the long-standing charges of plagiarism were added those of murder and adultery, with poor Fletcher Robinson portrayed as the victim and Conan Doyle as the perpetrator. This sort of outrageous stuff is manna from heaven for tabloid hacks, but Pugh and Spiring eschew any such sensationalist approach. These "new revelations" are given short shrift - which may come as a disappointment to anyone who wanted to gain a deeper insight into Rodger Garrick-Steele, the self-styled historian, whose long-running and vitriolic campaign has brought Robinson into the public domain again. It's almost enough to make one wonder if there's not another book in there, somewhere. To be fair, I think that both Pugh and Spiring in their determination to stay true to course, for what is in essence a serious no thrills historical study, have felt that an undue emphasis on the Garrick-Steele saga could only detract from the main aim of the book - to faithfully record the life of Bertram Fletcher Robinson.