This is the 1st part of my full review of the Takacs string quartets. Part 2 is for the 'middle' Quartets and Part 3 for the Late Quartets.
I am a Busch Quartet Lover (as are the Takacs players themselves) so those quartets loom in the back of my mind as the standard against which other performances are measured. Since the Busch performances were loved against years of listening to many other quartets as well, it is high praise for the Takacs that I consider the Takacs often their equal, and on some occasions (op59 no3) even superiour.
There is only one existing Busch recording of the Op18 quartets, that being No.1. In comparison, the Takacs come off rather badly. They give an immaculately played, yet rather relaxed version, and the slow movement really misses the depths that the Busch find. The thrilling breakneck mad ride given by the Busch in the last movement also leaves the rather staid Takacs looking utterly vanilla. So a competent, if rather boring lead off by the Takacs left me thinking this whole set might only be 3 stars or so. Fortunately, it gets better. (and no more Busch for withering comparisons!)
In fact Nos 2 3 and 4 are all fantastic performances in my book, nearly ideal. The outer movements storm, rage, dance, play, laugh and sing in equal measure, the slow movements enchant with Haydnesque wit and Beethovinian curios, and the scherzos rip along with a great deal of fun. This is marvelous music marvelously played and is worth the price of admittance itself. I particularly love the outrageous 1st movement of No3 which the Takacs take to its full dramatic height overdoing things as much as possible. Im sure Beethoven is smiling somewhere.
For comparison they are much more vital performances than the Talich, much more secure than the Lindsay, and rather more consistent than the Vegh (and much better recorded). My favorite performances of all 3.
Nos 5 and 6 compete with the outstanding Quartor Mosaiques disc (on original instruments). Those who know the Mosaiques appreciate how surely they play right from the heart of the music. They seem to capture the real Beethoven better than anyone since the Busch and its almost impossible to not be utterly enchanted by their performances. However, they do lack the fire that quartets such as the Busch, Berg, and Takacs have in abundance.
Certainly in the Takacs Op18 no5 and 6 there is plenty of satisfying fire and they improve upon the Mosaiques in that way. On the other hand they only touch the heart of the music intermittently, sometimes falling to their old trick from the middle quartet series of the repetative "crescendo effect". Also, Duisinberre seems particularly fond of heavy vibrato on occasion here, which really mars the opening of the No5 slow movement for example.
Still, these are very fine performances and only get showed up in comparison to the heartfelt rightness that is a special talent of the Mosaiques. The added fire and brilliance the Takacs bring even lets me prefer them somedays.
Overall then another fine addition to the Takacs complete set. There are no perfect collections of Beethoven's quartets and even bad performances will bring out unique insights. But for overall quality, both in terms of interpretation and recording, the Takacs are looking like the ones to beat (for the complete set anyway).