Beauty Pays: Why Attractive People Are More Successful and over one million other books are available for Amazon Kindle . Learn more


or
Sign in to turn on 1-Click ordering.
or
Amazon Prime free trial required. Sign up when you check out. Learn more
More Buying Choices
Have one to sell? Sell yours here
or
Get a £3.50 Amazon.co.uk Gift Card
Beauty Pays: Why Attractive People Are More Successful
 
 
Start reading Beauty Pays: Why Attractive People Are More Successful on your Kindle in under a minute.

Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.

Beauty Pays: Why Attractive People Are More Successful [Hardcover]

Daniel S. Hamermesh

RRP: £16.95
Price: £13.56 & this item Delivered FREE in the UK with Super Saver Delivery. See details and conditions
You Save: £3.39 (20%)
o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o
In stock.
Dispatched from and sold by Amazon.co.uk. Gift-wrap available.
Only 4 left in stock--order soon (more on the way).
Want guaranteed delivery by Tuesday, May 29? Choose Express delivery at checkout. See Details

Formats

Amazon Price New from Used from
Kindle Edition £12.20  
Hardcover £13.56  
Trade In this Item for up to £3.50
Trade in Beauty Pays: Why Attractive People Are More Successful for an Amazon.co.uk gift card of up to £3.50, which you can then spend on millions of items across the site. Plus, get an extra £5 when you trade in books worth £10 or more until June 30, 2012. Trade-in values may vary (terms apply). Find more products eligible for trade-in.

Frequently Bought Together

Customers buy this book with Honey Money: The Power of Erotic Capital £13.00

Beauty Pays: Why Attractive People Are More Successful + Honey Money: The Power of Erotic Capital
Price For Both: £26.56

Show availability and delivery details



Product details


More About the Author

Daniel S. Hamermesh
Discover books, learn about writers, and more.

Visit Amazon's Daniel S. Hamermesh Page

Product Description

Review

Since the mid-nineties, Daniel Hamermesh . . . has done a series of studies on the role that appearance plays in the workplace, and his conclusion is captured by the title of his recent book, Beauty Pays. In the U.S., he finds, better-looking men earn four per cent more than average-looking men of similar education and experience, and uglier men earn thirteen per cent less. . . . Hamermesh finds that pulchritude is valuable in nearly all professions, not just those where good looks may seem to be an obvious asset. . . . -- Jim Surowiecki, New Yorker

This chatty, economist's-eye-view of beauty in the marketplace provides solid statistical evidence that beauty does pay. -- "Publishers Weekly

An extensive, dizzying compilation of economic data explaining 'why attractive people are more successful.' A 40-year veteran in the field of economics, Hamermesh examines the correlation between beauty and economics. . . . Fascinating. -- "Kirkus Reviews

[A] no-warts-and-all exposé of how attractive people earn more, marry better and enjoy a wealth of positive discrimination. -- Anjana Ahuja, Prospect

Daniel Hamermesh . . . has long written about 'pulchronomics.' In Beauty Pays he reckons that, over a lifetime and assuming today's mean wages, a handsome working in America might on average make $230,000 more than a very plain one. There is evidence that attractive workers bring in more business, so it often makes sense for firms to hire them. Whether rewarding them accordingly--and paying their less attractive peers more stingily--is good for society is another matter. -- "Economist

If you live in the west and have lately looked at any magazine, watched any television, seen any movie, common sense would dictate that those who are better looking accrue the benefits of such a genetic roll of the dice. But what exactly those benefits are and if they are measurable is the point of Beauty Pays. . . . [T]his book . . . will prove more than just eye candy. -- "New York Journal of Books

University of Texas labor economist Daniel Hamermesh has devoted a share of his career to the study of physical beauty and how it affects employment and earning potential. In his new book, Beauty Pays, he offers up all sorts of data he's collected over years of work. His broad point, that attractive people enjoy advantages in hiring and earning, will surprise no one. But some of the details packed inside this thoughtful and in some respects quirky and confounding book, are illuminating. -- Susan Adams, Forbes

Hamermesh's analysis of empirical studies in his book Beauty Pays appears to suggest that being attractive does, indeed, bring measurable materials benefits. . . . Hamermesh's research appears to have clear implications for policy. -- "Sunday Times

Economist Daniel Hamermesh argues that ugliness is no different from race or a disability, and suggests unattractive people deserve legal protection. -- Luke Salkeld, Daily Mail

Beauty Pays is intriguing and easy to read. -- "World Magazine

In his book, Hamermesh concludes that better-looking employees are more productive, leading to higher sales and potentially higher profit. [Beauty Pays] also shows how society generates premium pay for beauty and penalties for ugliness. Hamermesh says beautiful people earn $230,000 more in a lifetime than workers with below-average looks. -- Sheryl Jean, Dallas Morning News

Professor Daniel Hamermesh . . . has investigated the financial benefits of beauty and found that looks have a bigger impact on our lifetime earning power than education. In his book, Beauty Pays, Professor Hamermesh says beautiful people are more likely to get jobs, raises and promotions, and suggests that, over a lifetime, the best-looking workers will earn about 10-15 percent more per year than the ugliest. -- "Australian Women's Weekly

Looks matter. . . . Labor markets as well as marriage markets, according to Daniel Hamermesh, offer premiums for good looks and penalties for ugliness. In Beauty Pays, Hamermesh assesses the role of appearance in American society, explores the options available to 'looks-challenged' people, and demonstrates that, although it's in its infancy, and is easy to mock, 'pulchronomics' (the economics of beauty) is a serious and significant subject. -- "Barron's

Beauty Pays is a pleasant and interesting read, but along the way it will challenge many of your preconceptions and leave you wondering why we as a society do not do more to protect those with less desirable looks. -- "Times Higher Education

For the last 20 years, Texas economist Hamermesh has been intrigued by, and has contributed significant research on, what one may term 'The Economics of Beauty'. This short, provocative, engaging volume takes its audience through the author's previous work and contemporary data, analyses, and impact of being considered good-looking by others on one's labor-market outcomes (employment and compensation); in the social world of friends and family; and even the extent to which one's happiness is affected by the presence (or absence) of looks. . . . Whether at the beach, on an airplane, or in the seminar room, Beauty Pays pays handsome dividends for intelligent lay readers, scholars, and public policy decision makers. -- "Choice

The book is absorbing and disturbing, for the thought upper most in the mind is 'Am I beautiful (enough).' -- Vaidehi Nathan, Organiser

Product Description

Most of us know there is a payoff to looking good, and in the quest for beauty we spend countless hours and billions of dollars on personal grooming, cosmetics, and plastic surgery. But how much better off are the better looking? Based on the evidence, quite a lot. The first book to seriously measure the advantages of beauty, Beauty Pays demonstrates how society favors the beautiful and how better-looking people experience startling but undeniable benefits in all aspects of life. Noted economist Daniel Hamermesh shows that the attractive are more likely to be employed, work more productively and profitably, receive more substantial pay, obtain loan approvals, negotiate loans with better terms, and have more handsome and highly educated spouses. Hamermesh explains why this happens and what it means for the beautiful--and the not-so-beautiful--among us.

Exploring whether a universal standard of beauty exists, Hamermesh illustrates how attractive workers make more money, how these amounts differ by gender, and how looks are valued differently based on profession. He considers whether extra pay for good-looking people represents discrimination, and, if so, who is discriminating. Hamermesh investigates the commodification of beauty in dating and how this influences the search for intelligent or high-earning mates, and even examines whether government programs should aid the ugly. He also discusses whether the economic benefits of beauty will persist into the foreseeable future and what the "looks-challenged" can do to overcome their disadvantage.

Reflecting on a sensitive issue that touches everyone, Beauty Pays proves that beauty's rewards are anything but superficial.


Inside This Book (Learn More)
Browse Sample Pages
Front Cover | Copyright | Table of Contents | Excerpt | Index
Search inside this book:

Suggested Tags from Similar Products

 (What's this?)
Be the first one to add a relevant tag (keyword that's strongly related to this product)
 

Your tags: Add your first tag
 

What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?


Customer Reviews

There are no customer reviews yet on Amazon.co.uk.
5 star
4 star
3 star
2 star
1 star
Most Helpful Customer Reviews on Amazon.com (beta)
Amazon.com:  2 reviews
8 of 15 people found the following review helpful
Beauty Pays Is an Overall Disappointment 18 Oct 2011
By Serge J. Van Steenkiste - Published on Amazon.com
Format:Hardcover
Daniel Hamermesh concentrates his attention on the economics of one's beauty, especially the impact of looks on earnings. This tour of horizon is ultimately unsatisfactory due to the weaknesses of the data set used, especially in Parts I and II of the book under review. This observation is counterintuitive due to the abundance of research that Mr. Hamermesh mentions in his notes. The data used is often either too old and/or limited to assess the exact extent of the undeniable effects of beauty on economics. For example, the author relies on data from the 1970s to calculate the percentage impacts of looks on earnings in the U.S. (pp. 45; 49). Other examples include the impact of better-looking CEOs (pp. 97; 99) or the extremely sparse case law in the jurisdictions that ban discrimination based on looks (p. 156). To his credit, Mr. Hamermesh acknowledges the limitations of these studies. Furthermore, some topics addressed in the book under review have not been the subject of any systematic study. Think for example about the impact of beauty during a recession or the impact of employees' beauty in boosting sales for a profit-making organization (pp. 50; 90). In summary, the evidence provided is too often piecemeal to accurately estimate the undeniable impact of beauty on economics.
11 of 20 people found the following review helpful
Pulchronomics 10 Oct 2011
By Jeffery Mingo - Published on Amazon.com
Format:Hardcover
I have to tell two anecdotes when it comes to my view of this book. First, there's a Wendy's manager down the street from my job and he's drop-dead gorgeous. He has that Shemar Moore/Drake type of look. On the one hand, I think I make more money than him, even though I can't hold a candle to him in the looks department. However, maybe his looks is what got him appointed manager over other Wendy's workers. So that's the thing: although the author says the beautiful get points that the ugly don't, it's not always dispositive. Education, family connections, age, and many other things privilege people; it's just that beauty is also one of those factors.

There was a guy who came to the office who looked like Jude Law. He had a cute, exotic Scottish accent too. It didn't matter how trivial any concern he had; I was always delighted whenever he came by. The author says beauty is scarce and people are willing to give others widgets in order to be in their beautiful presence. Then again, there was the person with a big, nasty, lazy eye who often came to the office. The eye looked just like the commercial character Digger the Dermatophile (sp?). It would bother me terribly when this person visited. I never understood why they couldn't just call. The author stresses that there's an ugly penalty that works hand in hand with beauty privilege.

The author never mentions Milton Friedman, but I'm sure he comes from that University of Chicago view of economics that says economic principles can explain everything. I thought this was readable, but less sophisticated readers may struggle a bit. The author is trying to write for the masses, even though his curriculum vitae is surely filled with high-falutin' writing. He peals the onion in looking at this matter. He asks do the beautiful just have more esteem and skills. He asks if we can just all have surgeries to be beautiful. This book is filled with cross-national comparisons. However, I don't know if that makes the work deep or if this is a sign that the author is grabbing for straws.

The author only focuses on physiognomy; if I understand correctly that means the shape and look of the face. So height and weight aren't really brought up here. I'm not sure that was right to drop those traits out of the picture. Many people tell fat woman, "But you have such a pretty face." Please see Camryn Manheim's autobiography as an example. When I can think of a whole group that get praised for their face and punished for their bodies, I don't know if that should be ignored. To be honest, I think something should be done to protect short men from discrimination too.

The work tries to use helpful, real-life examples. The author said notice that hottie Harry Hamlin played a trial lawyer on "L.A. Law" while a less attractive man was a tax attorney. He notes that Dustin Hoffman has won two Oscars, even though he's not known as a hottie. This made me think about politics. The press says close to nothing, but Mitt Romney is helped by looking so handsome. Chris Christie decided not to run for president and some wonder if he couldn't deal with the fat jokes that would be sure to come. How were Ross Perot's presidential chances hindered by his looks?

The author advocates that maybe the less attractive should get EEOC protection like some do based on race, age, or creed. I'm a little skeptical on that. I'm not sure plaintiffs would be willing to come out as ugly. The author gives examples of a woman with a port wine stain on her face or a worker missing teeth as examples of people that have made waves in anti-discrimination law. I would have liked to hear of more examples of that. This category still seems too nebulous to me for judges to take them seriously, especially the conservative judges appointed by the elephant-symbol party.

Customer Discussions

This product's forum
Discussion Replies Latest Post
No discussions yet

Ask questions, Share opinions, Gain insight
Start a new discussion
Topic:
First post:
Prompts for sign-in
 


Active discussions in related forums
Search Customer Discussions
Search all Amazon discussions
   
Related forums


Listmania!

Create a Listmania! list

Look for similar items by category


Look for similar items by subject


Feedback


Amazon.co.uk Privacy Statement Amazon.co.uk Delivery Information Amazon.co.uk Returns & Exchanges