Most Helpful Customer Reviews
6 of 9 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars
One of a glut, 16 Sep 2003
By A Customer
This review is from: The Battle for Iraq: BBC News Correspondents on the War Against Saddam and a New World Agenda (Paperback)
Reading this book, one is shocked by how far the BBC had moved from the days when its correspondents were experts in their own right. Rageh Omaar - exposed by the Times as a sycophant towards the Iraqi regime - makes great play of the fact he had been to Iraq five times: his 'diary' is written as if looking out from from his hotel room. The pieces by Jim Muir and Evan Davis are the pick of the crop, the material from the 'embedded' reporters rather silly. John Simpson for some reason gives a potted history of Saddam Hussein (if you want to know what made Saddam tick read the biography by Said Aburish). There is a glut of current books on the Iraq war (the Telegraph's and Reuters are much better than this one), adding insult to the injury of the blanket media coverage that followed decades of ignoring Saddam Hussein's crimes. Where were all these people when young men were being mown down in the Iran-Iraq war, when 4500 Kurdish villages were destroyed and when the Shia of southern Iraq were butchered? And where are the journalists - like David Hirst of the Guardian and the film-maker Gwynn Roberts - who did tell the world what was happening in those days? Have they been pushed aside by people who look better on television?
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
6 of 9 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Slicing through the fog, 18 Jun 2003
This review is from: The Battle for Iraq: BBC News Correspondents on the War Against Saddam and a New World Agenda (Paperback)
What a surprise. I was ready to be disappointed with such an instant book on a subject where the dust still has not settled back into the desert. But this is a book which displays the best of the BBC: balance and insight. It is a series of reports from some of the best BBC reporters. It is less a narrative of the war, (which would be tedious): it is more a series of insights on the whole episode, written from different perspectives: Iraqi, American, British, French, economic, military, diplomatic. The book will probably be hated by people who prefer opinions to facts, hype to analysis and prejudice to balance. But I found that this is a useful reference point amidst the increasing fog of argument that is engulfing the conflict and its aftermath. Each chapter is short enough to be accessible, long enough to offer insight. This book reflects the standards we always used to identify with the BBC. Let's hope they keep it up.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
8 of 12 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Excellent...an Iraqi says so!!!!, 17 Sep 2003
By A Customer
This review is from: The Battle for Iraq: BBC News Correspondents on the War Against Saddam and a New World Agenda (Paperback)
As an Iraqi, i found this an excellent account of the events leading to the Gulf war, with thoughtful and revealing insights into the two men in the boxing ring, Saddam and George Jr. Thoroughly recommend this for everyone to read
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
|