Have one to sell? Sell yours here
A Bardon Companion: Commentary Upon Franz Bardon's Books
 
See larger image
 
Tell the Publisher!
I’d like to read this book on Kindle

Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.

A Bardon Companion: Commentary Upon Franz Bardon's Books [Paperback]

Rawn Clark
5.0 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (2 customer reviews)

Available from these sellers.


‹  Return to Product Overview

Product Description

Book Description

224 page (soft cover) 1st Edition

Rawn Clark's practical commentaries for the student and reader of Franz Bardon's three books: "Initiation Into Hermetics", "The Practice of Magical Evocation" and "The Key to the True Quabbalah". Includes an opening section titled, "Introductory Material" in which is given a brief biography and a synopsis of all the books written by and about Franz Bardon. The book ends with an appendix titled, "Shielding".

From the Author

These commentaries represent the practical lessons that I have learned from personally pursuing Bardon's system of Hermetic self-initiation. They also reflect my years of participating in online Bardon-related discussion groups in which I have encountered just about every sort of question imaginable. ;-) Consequently, they were designed to be of practical help to the student of Bardon's system, as well as the passive reader of Bardon's three books.

This book is currently being translated into both French and German and will soon be published in these languages as well.

About the Author

Rawn Clark lives in Northern California (USA) and is a modern practitioner of the Hermetic Arts. A prolific writer, he is best known for his commitment to the work of Franz Bardon and for his support of modern day students of the great Czech magus.

Excerpted from A Bardon Companion by Rawn Clark. Copyright © 2002. Reprinted by permission. All rights reserved.

Author’s Preface

On a few occasions, I have been asked to write some sort of student's guide to Franz Bardon's "Initiation Into Hermetics". Each time, I responded with something like "I can't think of anything to add." And for years I've held this opinion, but my experiences participating in an Internet e-board discussion group about Bardon's works has led me to reconsider that sentiment. So, when I was asked to rewrite the Franz Bardon FAQ that appeared on a popular website, I consented to write a few things concerning the first four Steps of IIH. Little did I know at the outset that I'd find all kinds of things to say! Word junkie that I am, I ended up writing no less than 37 full pages of commentary and answers to commonly asked questions. Even at that, hundreds more pages could be written.

Making things understood, presenting concepts in such a way that it is easy for the reader to grasp them, is the responsibility of the writer. But the writer's responsibility stops there -- it is up to the reader to do the understanding itself. And it’s the reader who doesn't quite grasp the author's meaning that’s the one responsible for trying to figure it out. That is indeed the failing of a written thing -- there is no chance for dialogue and for putting all your questions to the author for clarification. Consequently, many written things remain misunderstood by many, or at least only partially understood.

In the case of Franz Bardon's books, this is compounded by the fact that as he wrote them, he placed himself in the perspective of the student who is actually involved with the labor of the material he describes. For instance, when he describes the exercises of Step Five in IIH, he is saying things that only a student who has done the labor of the Step One, Two, Three and Four exercises, will understand. Thus, the student who is in the middle of Step Two, or the student who is reading IIH for the first time and hasn't even begun the work, will understand what Bardon wrote regarding Step Five, less completely than someone who has completed the Step Four work.

This was certainly the case for me and as I progressed through the Steps. I was repeatedly surprised to find that I had previously misunderstood things in the mere reading of the text that now made perfect sense because I had done the work leading up to that point in the path. It was within this thought that I found a reason for writing my commentaries.

I firmly believe that anyone who has progressed through IIH up to the start of Step Five, has no need for outside advice. The student of Step Five will have mastered the most rudimentary techniques upon which the remainder of the course is constructed. Plus, the student will have learned the ability to puzzle out their questions on their own and will have, by necessity, honed this skill to a razor sharpness. At this point, IIH becomes much easier for the student.

This stage, typified by the student's ability to ask their questions internally and seek out answers through their own experimentation, is a necessary part of the path of initiation. As you trod the path of initiation, the responsibility for your progress falls more and more into your own hands. Inquisitiveness and inventiveness are both important allies of the student of magic and there are certain passages where that is all you will have at your disposal to work with.

I have tried to find a balance between giving this fact its due respect and trying my best to steer away from giving encouragement to those who wish to leap farther than they are truly prepared to step. My compromise has been to do two things in regard to IIH: First, I have limited my detailed commentary and practical suggestions to the "Theory" section and the exercises of Steps One through Four.

Second, I have written a commentary on Steps Five through Ten which outlines some of the points where Bardon's way of writing from the student's immediate perspective interferes with the understanding of the unprepared reader. I will not offer my practical advice for these later Steps other than in personal correspondence or conversation with practicing students of those particular Steps. The same holds true for Bardon's second and third books, the "Practice of Magical Evocation" and "The Key to the True Quabbalah." I should add here, that I don't expect I'll ever be asked such questions anyway. Everyone that I know that has reached these stages in their initiation does not need to ask the advice of another person, consequently they don't ask.

All of my internal rationale aside, I do have concern that those who read IIH or who look ahead to the Steps to come, will get the wrong picture of what it all really means. At many places in IIH, Bardon has to resort to metaphors that can only be understood if you already know what all went into the metaphor in the first place. It is difficult for the reader to make the subtle connections between what is learned in one Step and what is then applied in a new way in the next.

‹  Return to Product Overview