I first read the Pendragon Cycle several years ago and am still a huge fan. As I also enjoy political thrillers, I seized joyfully on this book - only to find an ill-put-together royalist propaganda tract. I did manage to finish it - Lawhead is still a good writer, and kept me turning the pages - but I was sorely disappointed. The ridiculously contrived story to account for James being the heir of the Duke of Morvern was faux-romantic tat more worthy of Barbara Cartland than Lawhead; and if Morgian is dedicated to bringing down the monarchy and has had fifteen centuries in which to hone her skills, why does her every action seem almost calculated to strengthen it? She comes across not as the terrifying force for evil she was in the earlier books but as a stupid airheaded bimbo.
But worst, I think, was the central premise of the book: that, after continuing to sleep through all the perils that have menaced Britain since the sixth century, Arthur should return to save the country from... republicanism. Is it supposed to be the ultimate evil? And why does an arch-royalist, even an American-born one, manage to get royal titles so consistently wrong?
I did enjoy the satire on New Labour, thinly disguised as the "British Republic Party"; but it was surely implausible that right, left and centre would coalesce so easily to fight the monster as they do in the book. (I see no sign of that in real life.)
The characters deserve better plots and surroundings; there was scarcely one who did not seem out of place. Lawhead should return to the Dark Ages, and quickly - it's where he belongs.