Have one to sell?
Flip to back Flip to front
Listen Playing... Paused   You're listening to a sample of the Audible audio edition.
Learn more
See this image

Atheist Manifesto: The Case Against Christianity, Judaism, and Islam Hardcover – 10 Jan 2007

4 customer reviews

See all 3 formats and editions Hide other formats and editions
Amazon Price New from Used from
Hardcover
"Please retry"
£15.19



Product details

  • Hardcover: 219 pages
  • Publisher: Arcade Publishing; First Edition edition (10 Jan. 2007)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 1559708204
  • ISBN-13: 978-1559708203
  • Product Dimensions: 16.2 x 2.2 x 24.1 cm
  • Average Customer Review: 4.2 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (4 customer reviews)
  • Amazon Bestsellers Rank: 1,462,063 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

More About the Author

Discover books, learn about writers, and more.

What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?

Customer Reviews

4.3 out of 5 stars
Share your thoughts with other customers

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

59 of 66 people found the following review helpful By Fouad Boussetta on 21 Feb. 2007
Format: Hardcover
*This absolutely excellent work is a very precise deconstruction of Judaism, Christianity, and Islam, charting the historic origins and evolution of these three closely related monotheisms.

*The original title in French is "Traite d'Atheologie", which accurately describes the contents. Here in Canada, the English translation's title ("In Defense of Atheism") is unfortunate, the tone of the book being far from defensive (It's rather scathingly critical).

*Onfray is a very popular French philosopher, and I tremendously enjoyed his literary style: it's both flowery and ... meaty.

*The author obviously spent a tremendous amount of time pouring over the so-called "holy" texts of Judaism, Christianity, and Islam (and other books). There are no factual errors in his work to my knowledge.

*Critics complain Onfray ignores the good side of religion. Well, he doesn't: he just dismisses it as relatively insignificant compared to its atrocious side.

*Onfray interestingly observes that even though our western societies are now secular, they are still pretty much stuck with judeo-christian values

(See for example the institution of marriage or the bioethics debates).

*I highly recommend this book, that I just finished reading today in its

original language.
1 Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
50 of 57 people found the following review helpful By NoWireHangers on 7 Jan. 2007
Format: Hardcover
Michel Onfray's "Atheist Manifesto" is the latest of many recent books about religion, atheism and secularism. This book is not a scientific study or an attempt to disprove the religions, but a philosophical polemic against religions (an "Atheological treatise" as the original French title would translate) and a call for a post-Christian secularism.

Onfray is an atheist but he doesn't seem to be attempting to convert anyone to atheism, and indeed, his writing style is not likely to convert believers. Instead, the book is a polemic reflection about the effects of religion and a call to reason, probably aimed mostly at fellow atheists.

An interesting chapter of the book is spent deconstructing the myth of Jesus and how Christianity came to be the world's biggest religion and how some of it's teachings (especially those of Paul) may have come to be.

Another large portion of the book explains why religion has been the monotheistic teachings have caused so much evil. It's all very true but not exactly news.

The real purpose of the book comes in the last few pages, where he returns to something he wrote about in the beginning of the book. Here he says the choice is not between western Judeo-Christian values and Muslim values, but between religion and secularism. According to Onfray, much of the current secular values have their roots in the Judeo-Christian tradition, and he calls for a post-Christian secularism with post-Christian ethics.

Onfray is obviously a very knowledgeable philosopher and he makes many good points. The book is probably aimed at atheists and philosophers. It's not a book to start with for those new to atheism or those with only a sporadic interest in ahteism or religion, but at the same time, for the already-convinced atheist, such as myself, there's really not much new to be found in this book.
1 Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
50 of 59 people found the following review helpful By Stephan Otto on 31 Dec. 2006
Format: Hardcover
Onfray shows through historical and philosophical examples how the myths of monotheism and later Christianity were created and how the whole story was trimmed to suit the people in power.

Constantine was the first roman emperor who converted to Christianity. He saw clearly how this new religion would help him to establish a totalitarian regime. For nearly two millennia others would follow and use a fairytale to gain power over large parts of the world and brutalize everyone who wouldn't comply.

The book puts into easy readable words what I thought for myself since I started to think at around 12 years of age. But I could never really articulate my thought about the subject very well. Onfray does this brilliantly.

Must read for everyone! This way of thinking should be taught in schools.
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
0 of 2 people found the following review helpful By A. on 29 Jun. 2011
Format: Paperback
Michel Onfray shares a delightful, full bodied, mature philosophy in his excellent 'Atheist Manifesto'. It is a well balanced, robust and easily read vintage which goes down smoothly, satisfying parts of the brain that Christian apologetics never could. Michel gives an omniscient view over the history of religion and the various philosophical viewpoints it is possible to hold. In section 3 Michel looks at the historical progress in thought from judeo-christian epistemology up to Christian atheism and on to postmodern atheism.
This is a book of calm and measured tone, a superb addition to the cellar of any discerning connoisseur of heresy but also recommended to those just venturing from the apron of monotheism. Some unaccoustomed to its bouquet may need a whole bottle of this whine before their palette appreciates it's subtle richness.
Actually in a few places Michel lets some generalisations obscure his point. For instance on page 28 he quotes from 'The Deception Revealed' by Cristovao Ferreira who wrote that The Ten Commandments were impracticable lunacy. Well Christopher Hitchens gives a superb critique of the Ten Commandments on Youtube. While I agree with Ferreira that some of the Ten are indeed flawed and none are divinely inspired, I think it is a bit cynical to not give credit to the worthy points. Do not murder, do not steal, do not lie, don't cheat on your partner, respect your parents are good as basic default rules. Dan Barker in his good book 'Godless' explains the limitations of these rules but in broad brush terms they are good laws without which society would be anarchy.
There are other points in the Bible which are interesting puzzles e.g love your enemy, a phrase which is simultaneously mad and sane, foolish and wise. Who or what is my enemy?
Read more ›
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again

Most Helpful Customer Reviews on Amazon.com (beta)

Amazon.com: 80 reviews
145 of 157 people found the following review helpful
Michel Onfray dissects precisely, using a magnifying glass... 21 Feb. 2007
By Fouad Boussetta - Published on Amazon.com
Format: Hardcover
*This absolutely excellent work is a very precise deconstruction of Judaism, Christianity, and Islam, charting the historic origins and evolution of these three closely related monotheisms.

*The original title in French is "Traite d'Atheologie", which accurately describes the contents. Here in Canada, the English translation's title is "In Defense of Atheism", which is unfortunate, the tone of the book being far from defensive (It's rather scathingly critical).

*Onfray is a very popular French philosopher, and I tremendously enjoyed his literary style: it's both flowery and ... meaty.

*The author obviously spent a tremendous amount of time pouring over the so-called "holy" texts of Judaism, Christianity, and Islam (and other books). There are no factual errors in his work to my knowledge.

*Critics complain Onfray ignores the good side of religion. Well, he doesn't: he just dismisses it as relatively insignificant compared to its atrocious side.

*Onfray interestingly observes that even though our western societies are now secular, they are still pretty much stuck with judeo-christian values

(See for example the institution of marriage or the bioethics debates).

*I highly recommend this book, that I just finished reading today in its

original language.
40 of 44 people found the following review helpful
Spirited Polemic - Vigorously Argued 2 Jun. 2007
By dennis wentraub - Published on Amazon.com
Format: Hardcover Verified Purchase
An age of rational inquiry, the Enlightenment, constellated with the genius of Voltaire, Descartes, Kant, et.al. followed by an age of "suspicion" that included Nietzsche, Marx, and Freud - these two great periods gave mankind the philosophical tools to question the authority of and ultimately see the damage perpetrated by the three dominant religions. Onfray's indictment of religion is laced with sarcasm for its banner of "brotherly love". He reviews its complicity in thirty centuries of crimes and injustices. As for the authority of their holy books, they are a hodge-podge of improbabilities, fables and - an this is critical - enough contradictions and inconsistencies to justify virtually any act of violence against the non-believer.

Onfray outlines the similarities of Christianity, Judaism, and Islam. He then sketches the growth of their influence. In the end Onfay offers readers a choice. On the one hand we have reason, knowledge, freedom, pride, democracy, equality of the sexes, the joy of sex, and a passion for this world. Religion offers us dogma, faith, a distrust of science, submission, theocracy, guilt, misogyny, sexual repression, and an unhealthy focus on an afterlife. Simply stated, Onfray's manifesto starts from a flat rejection of God - and an afterlife that discounts this precious life - as a fiction in the face of what is obvious - extinction.

For all the promise of secularism - its greatest victory is the separation of church and state - we are still in a religious era. Still, Onfray sees signs of turbulence that signal a tectonic shift into a transitional post-religious age. But he chides the post-Christian secularist movement for not being "militant" enough (viz. too accomodating) in its opposition to all religious thinking. Borrowing from Nietzsche, he says, and this is where he loses me - we can choose not to make a choice - in this application, between "Israel" and the goals of an Iranian revolution. His point: all the religions are equally bad. From this side of the Atlantic (Onfray's book has been translated from his native French), it appears that cracks in the Judeo-Christian religious world are coincident with the eruption of militant, political Islamic states. Pragmatism and morality suggest siding with the better of the two.

So is Onfray unfair? Is he inclined to bully his case? Not the point. This is a polemic intended to shake the rafters. The ideas rush with energy and passion (I count one sentence with over ninety words!). Open your mind and you will read this book with rapt attention.
124 of 147 people found the following review helpful
Atheist Manifesto 9 Jan. 2007
By NoWireHangers - Published on Amazon.com
Format: Hardcover
Michel Onfray's "Atheist Manifesto" is the latest of many recent books about religion, atheism and secularism. This book is not a scientific study or an attempt to disprove the religions, but a philosophical polemic against religions (an "Atheological treatise" as the original French title would translate) and a call for a post-Christian secularism.

Onfray is an atheist but he doesn't seem to be attempting to convert anyone to atheism, and indeed, his writing style is not likely to convert believers. Instead, the book is a polemic reflection about the effects of religion and a call to reason, probably aimed mostly at fellow atheists.

An interesting chapter of the book is spent deconstructing the myth of Jesus and how Christianity came to be the world's biggest religion and how some of it's teachings (especially those of Paul) may have come to be.

Another large portion of the book explains why religion has been the monotheistic teachings have caused so much evil. It's all very true but not exactly news.

The real purpose of the book comes in the last few pages, where he returns to something he wrote about in the beginning of the book. Here he says the choice is not between western Judeo-Christian values and Muslim values, but between religion and secularism. According to Onfray, much of the current secular values have their roots in the Judeo-Christian tradition, and he calls for a post-Christian secularism with post-Christian ethics.

Onfray is obviously a very knowledgeable philosopher and he makes many good points. The book is probably aimed at atheists and philosophers. It's not a book to start with for those new to atheism or those with only a sporadic interest in ahteism or religion, but at the same time, for the already-convinced atheist, such as myself, there's really not much new to be found in this book.
66 of 78 people found the following review helpful
Beautiful Book, Graciously Written 11 Jan. 2007
By George Smith - Published on Amazon.com
Format: Hardcover
This book is beautifully, graciously and thoughtfully written. Conceptually clear and brilliant, Monsieur Onfray advocates philosophers, instead of priests, rabbis or mullahs, be our representatives. Who are these, his philosophers? The laughers, the cynics, the radicals, the atheists, the sensualists and voluptuaries, though he rarely names names. I did find three in the course of the book: Nietzche, Gilles Deleuze, and Jeremny Bentham (particularly Bentham's work, "Deontology"). Monsieur Onfray's analysis of Christian, Judaic, and Islamic faiths, all three united under the point of view of "hatred of life" (in conjunction with suppression of sex and advocacy of violence), is quite readable, fair, and clear. Monsieur Onfray makes clear as well that Hilter was a Roman Catholic and the Catholic Church, without question, supported Nazism. Monsieur Onfray's analysis is such that Catholicism appears to be the worst evil suffered in the West thus far. However, in his discussion of the Muslim faith, he reveals how frighteningly violent it is, particularly should it get a good foothold in the West. (Shades of Sam Harris's point of view about Islam in his book "The End of Faith"!) Michael Onfray, in the last pages, speaks of the "final battle" (post-Christian experience) which, he asserts, is "already lost." He wants us to live in a de-Christianized society, but it is as if this idea is really but a dream. Social critic and author Curtis White has an important insight that Monsieur Onfray (and Sam Harris as well) might do well to consider: the Manichean conflict between atheism and religion is less significant to the future of the West than the evils that have been created in the West by state/corporate capitalism, particularly in the United States. This book is well worth the purchase price. I have no regrets. We can dream. It's a treasure.
59 of 71 people found the following review helpful
fantastic book ,clear and thought provoking 30 Jan. 2007
By j figueroa - Published on Amazon.com
Format: Hardcover
The 2 last reviewers said it all. I would like to add that the book presents a very difficult topic and is very easy to read due to the clear balanced way Mr Onfray exposes his point of view. Loved this book. A must read as we go into this complex century.You don't have to be an atheist to like this book,you have to have an open mind.
Were these reviews helpful? Let us know


Feedback