This book's value for the reader is twofold; first, the new translations done by Anatolios contemporize the language over the publicly available texts of the Nicene Fathers: "Thou then, as a man of learning, in spite of their subterfuges, didst convict them of talking to no purpose; and they in devising them were but acting suitably to their own evil disposition;" compare this to "But you, as a learned and articulate man, convicted them of talking nonsense, despite their pretences. Nevertheless, in the invention of these pretences of theirs, they are not acting inconsistently with their own evil minds" (178). This work removes one cumbersome hindrance to reading Athanasius and allows the passion of the scholar to inspire his contemporary readers. In addition, Anatolios has provided extensive explanatory endnotes, bibliography, and most importantly, a rich, thorough introduction.
Athanasius was bishop of the most cosmopolitan city in fourth century Egypt, Alexandria. He was made bishop at age thirty, just three years after the Council of Nicaea, which he attended as a secretary to his bishop. It is that council that he defended vehemently against any attackers. One selection included here is "On the Council of Nicaea" in which he defends the Council's position against Eusebians who criticized the Council on the use of unscriptural terms to explain the Scripture. Athanasius habitually identified his enemies with the Arians, as he does in this writing, in order to immediately identify them as holding heretical views, and then, step by step, he decimates their arguments. For Athanasius, the subject matter was of such ultimate importance, it justified the use of such tactics.
The hallmarks of his theology were the guide for inclusion in this volume. They include defense of the Council of Nicaea, the divinity and humanity of Christ, divinity of the Holy Spirit and Christian Worship, all of which are represented in this text. This book is such an excellent introduction to Athanasius and by extension, the fourth century debates in the Church, that it makes this reviewer consider that the entire series may do the same for the other Fathers of the Church.