As a transwoman, books about transgender theory typically make my skin crawl with the anticipation of the author's short-sighted and prejudicial stance. We get beat up alot by our critics and they come in all ilks, academics included. Gayle Salamon takes a somewhat meandering perspective using the phenomenolgy of Merleau-Ponty (not Hegel) and some psychoanalytic theory from Freud to critically deconstruct the sometimes polemical views of others on the subject of trans-embodiment and meaning. I found the book to be a bit uneven - it sometimes resorts to the linguistic density of Judith Butler and at other times (especially from chapter four on) is perfectly understandable and coherent. Salamon appears to use critical theory and the dialectic to extract appearance from essence ala Horkheimer and Adorno, surgically removing the masks of bias from the face of existing separatist and essentialist theories. The book does introduce some interesting concepts and arguements which hopefully will stimulate new thinking about what trans-people mean, especially to feminists who refuse to take responsibility for our existence. I do think that the author places an over-emphasis on sexuality and sometimes drifts into metaphysical territory that exists on the plane of a dream-scape. Education and ideas in support of the gender-possible are always appreciated, although the paradox lies in watching a debate unfold over our right to exist, something that we already take for granted. I do recommend this book with the single caveat that it isn't specifically about trans-folks but a serious theoretical and philosophical persepctive regarding the subject(s). For a primer on being transgendered look to Kate Bornstein.