I find the biography informative about a man who passed on when I was seven and have this aura about him that elevates him high in the sights of the Malaysian & Singapore Society.
I would agree on the point that this man shaped what Malaysia had become and could have achieved, and it is backed by his background and upbringing. One could see that on the secular side, he is a man high on discipline and ethically sound - a very fair man indeed. But shaped by his social interactions at an early age - or rather lacked of with his ethnic society.
Given that he is born into the highest strata of Malay society, his lack of a touch of involvement with the Malay working class is evidently missing, thus showing lack of connection with the Malay grounds. There seems also to be a lack of evidence brought foward on his training in the islamic learning - which shows his tendency to be anglophilic which is natural as the westerners were thought to be more educated and civilised by the malay ruling class, who tend to copy them.
As a Muslim, I would see him as a flawed character - evidently he is not a practicing Muslim, though he has redeeming qualities. Is not steep in the islamic knowledge or have a tendency to inculcate the islamic ethics in his positions. This is the flaw that is seen, and is disappoiting that the writer does not see it neccessary to tone down this flaw - the direct flouting of basic islamic tenets & the non-evident of performing the islamic requirements.
An in all, I find the book a good read....