The book which inspired the latest 'King Arthur' movie, this volume is written by a man who rigorously points to his own lack of credentials as an historian. Alistair Moffat nevertheless identifies one major factor which is largely lost in much popular history - the people who inhabited what is now the borders of Scotland were, until the Romans arrived, Welsh speaking. Their legacy can be found in the place names of southern Scotland and northern England. The Roman invasion drove the Welsh speakers into what is now Wales, and left the peoples of the Lowlands of Scotland and the north of England to be colonised by other cultures.
Moffat is largely dependent on linguistic inquiry, trying to make sense of Celtic traditions and languages which had never been written down. He considers how Britain came to that name - it was from the Roman colonial name of 'Britannia'. No one living on the island had considered themselves 'British' until the Romans came. 'Britannia', itself, comes from a corruption of the Roman geographer, Ptolemy's description of Albion as a "Prettanic isle" - 'prettanic' appearing to allude to the painted men who occupied it. Albion? Moffat points out that 'Alba', the contemporary Gaelic word for Scotland, originated from the description of the white cliffs of Dover - the Latin 'alba' means white. Hence we get 'Albion', meaning Britain.
Moffat uncovers much interesting material like this, and, despite his deconstruction of language, his writing style is accessible and very readable.
However, he seems to be dogged by an assumption that somehow the whole of Britain had some sort of cohesive, national identity, despite being broken up into recognisable kingdoms, harassed by barbaric tribes like the Caledonians or Hibernians. His search for Arthur is for a man who lived in the Scottish borders, Moffat's home (and mine). His Arthur is a post-Roman warlord who unites the native Celts against invaders, giving them a British identity ... and whose legacy and history will later be corrupted by the invading Anglo-Saxons as they try to establish their historic rights to the island.
Moffat does seem to get a bit confused in places - and there are some significant errors in his analysis and his history. He argues, for instance, that there are hundreds, if not thousands of places named after Arthur in Britain; he concludes that this points to there being a real Arthur around the time of the Roman departure from the island. It could equally point to a folklore 'Arthur' (or many such characters) dating back centuries before.
It's an entertaining read, it does give a perspective on how legends can become real in pre-literate societies and literate ones, and it's a book which should stimulate you to think about the culture and heritage of the borders of Scotland, but, as for his identification of the 'real' Arthur as a Romanised war leader, well, I was still left unconvinced.