Buy Used
£7.06
+ £2.80 UK delivery
Used: Good | Details
Condition: Used: Good
Comment: Ships from the USA. Please allow 2 to 3 weeks for delivery. Book shows a small amount of wear to cover and binding. Some pages show signs of use. Sail the seas of value.
Trade in your item
Get a £2.10
Gift Card.
Have one to sell?
Flip to back Flip to front
Listen Playing... Paused   You're listening to a sample of the Audible audio edition.
Learn more
See all 2 images

Art & Physics: Parallel Visions in Space, Time, and Light (P.S.) Paperback – Mar 2007


See all formats and editions Hide other formats and editions
Amazon Price New from Used from
Paperback
"Please retry"
£7.05


Trade In this Item for up to £2.10
Trade in Art & Physics: Parallel Visions in Space, Time, and Light (P.S.) for an Amazon Gift Card of up to £2.10, which you can then spend on millions of items across the site. Trade-in values may vary (terms apply). Learn more

Product details

  • Paperback: 480 pages
  • Publisher: Harper Perennial (Mar. 2007)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 0061227978
  • ISBN-13: 978-0061227974
  • Product Dimensions: 15.6 x 3.1 x 23.2 cm
  • Average Customer Review: 5.0 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (1 customer review)
  • Amazon Bestsellers Rank: 614,687 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

More About the Author

Discover books, learn about writers, and more.

Product Description

Art and Physics Art interprets the visible world, while physics charts its unseen workings--making the two realms seem completely opposed. But in Art & Physics, Shlain tracks their breakthroughs side by side throughout history to reveal an astonishing correlation of visions. He explores art's strange clairvoyance by invoking evolutionary theory, split-brain research, philosophy and mythology. Photos and illus Full description

Customer Reviews

5.0 out of 5 stars
5 star
1
4 star
0
3 star
0
2 star
0
1 star
0
See the customer review
Share your thoughts with other customers

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

3 of 3 people found the following review helpful By Chris on 7 Jan. 2013
Format: Paperback Verified Purchase
I found the first chapter a little clumsy as writing is not the authors main profession. However as the book progresses this settles down and it becomes incredibly interesting. As an artist myself I have always felt that art is the imagination of mankind and science is the implementation. This book explores these ideas giving examples across the history of both art and science. It's also an interesting take on the subconscious and the conscious mind. I think anyone with an interest in art and science should give this a read as it draws the two together in a way you might not have thought of
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again

Most Helpful Customer Reviews on Amazon.com (beta)

Amazon.com: 12 reviews
8 of 8 people found the following review helpful
Amazing correlations 9 Jan. 2012
By Hazel - Published on Amazon.com
Format: Paperback Verified Purchase
A different and thought provoking book relating artists insights to discoveries in physics.Fascinating reading.I definitely recommend this book. I find I have to read it first thing in the morning when I am able to concentrate. It is not for a relaxed read!
15 of 18 people found the following review helpful
Interesting Connections 6 May 2008
By Dr. Joan E. Aitken - Published on Amazon.com
Format: Paperback Verified Purchase
This book seeks to provide connections about art and science. I would have liked more visual illustrations, but anyone who seeks to understand the patterns of this world will find the ideas interesting.

Academic disciplines have become segregated in our individual disciplines, so this kind of synthesis is unique.

I bought this book because it was recommended by one of my graduate students. The book was a gift for an engineer who enjoys art and design.
62 of 85 people found the following review helpful
Shallow and confused 31 Dec. 2007
By Fredo Durand - Published on Amazon.com
Format: Paperback
Leonard Shlain is a surgeon, not an art historian neither a physicist. His culture is impressively broad, but unfortunately shallow. His main thesis in this book is that basically all scientific discoveries were anticipated by artists. I find the interwoven relationship between art and science absolutely fascinating, but this book is not a reference that I would recommand on the topic.

The main problem is that this book abuses of the juxtaposition of unrelated facts, and presents them with such virtuosity that a magical causality seem to appear. Shlain presents ancient thoughts with the enlightenment of modern frameworks, subtly rewriting them, emphasizing concept and translating them such that they seem to fit with forthcoming theories.

This kind of pitfall has been described by Kuhn (the structure of scientific revolution). For example, if Newtonian mechanics can be expressed in the framework of relativity, relativity is NOT and extension of Newtonian physics, there is a fundamental revolution between them. It is only because Newtonian physics has been rewritten that it becomes more compatible with Einstein's new insights.

Moreover, Shlain's understanding of relativity is weak at best. For example, he often makes the confusion between the effect of the finite speed of light (which can be expressed in a Newtonian context) and relativity.

I was all the more disappointed that some of the issues are actually relevant and fascinating: relativity, non Euclidean, surrealism and cubism for example do share a common revolution of the notion of space (and thus of the place of humans in the world). Unfortunately, Shlain's caricatural statements are irrelevant: Manet had absolutely no idea of the concepts involved in relativity, and Einstein himself pointed out that cubism had nothing to deal with relativity (as opposed to Picasso's claims).

If you want a good introduction to art history, read Gombrich, if you want to learn about physics in a broad context, read Zajong (Catching the light).
14 of 18 people found the following review helpful
Art & Physics:Parallel Visions in Space, Time, and Light 14 Jun. 2007
By Karen Reisdorf - Published on Amazon.com
Format: Paperback Verified Purchase
I thought this was a wonderful book. Tying the evolution of art to the evolution of thinking and science gave me a more holistic way to look at art. From the ancient Greeks through the Dark and Middle Ages, the Impressionists, and into modern times the parallels of physics to art are simply amazing. Perfect for us "left-brained" types.
3 of 3 people found the following review helpful
Selective Sampling in Action 8 Jan. 2014
By D. Dobkin - Published on Amazon.com
Format: Paperback
I am in close agreement with Mr. Durand's review and will not bother to rehash its points. Dr. Shlain's understanding of post-Newtonian physics is superficial at best. His arguments about the connections between art and physics are often incoherent and always unconvincing. He ignores profoundly obvious issues, such as the fact that the invention of photography in the 19th century meant that the revenue stream of representative artists was threatened by cheap accurate images. They had to invent new things to paint and sculpt in order to make a living -- a much more plausible explanation for the changes in art in that period than assertions of mysterious precognition. He makes a great deal of the abandonment of shadows in modern art as a prelude to relativistic physics -- as a physician, one would have thought that he would realize that people don't store images of objects but representations of objects: you don't remember how something is illuminated, you remember how it is shaped. It is natural to draw or paint a shape and not its illuminated representation, and he correctly points out that many traditional arts do exactly that. Did cave painters at Lascaux or Cosquer -- who were often wonderfully skilled -- anticipate relativity thirty thousand years ago? The argument becomes absurd. And let's not even get started on the chapter on the Universal Mind, a phenomenon for which no evidence whatsoever is presented.

This is all very sad, because the book is actually worth reading even with its faults. The thesis Dr. Shlain should have examined, and the one that is interesting to reflect upon as you progress, is the influence that concepts that are available in a society have on what a scientist or an artist can think of. It is well-known today that the language you speak influences how you think, because you get good at what you practice. Do the ideas that people encounter in their daily life play an important role in creative invention? Are advances delayed because the requisite pictures are not available for the researcher or artist to exploit?

And many of the artworks reproduced (sadly in grayscale) in the book have their own charm irrespective of the interpretations foisted upon them. So don't be afraid to buy or borrow the book -- just have realistic expectations and a bit of skepticism.
Were these reviews helpful? Let us know


Feedback