Mike Waldren's study of armed policing in London since 1945 is as much a personal memoir as it is a researched study. His earlier book -
London's Armed Police written with Robert Gould covers the earlier period and is quite fascinating. In this book he details many of the well-known incidents of the past three decades, in many cases through the eyes of the police who were there. He does not shy away from accounting for errors of judgement, such as the shooting of Stephen Waldorf in 1982 or that of "Cherry" Groce in 1985. He manages to shoe-horn in mention of the Hungerford and Dunblane multiple homicides and their legislative consequences, although these did not take place in London and whilst he dwells at some length on the catalytic murders of three London policemen in London in 1966, he does not mention the legislative consequences of that incident.
The theme of the book is the development, and then the professionalization, of the firearms branch (currently CO19) as both an operational policing tool and as a training division. The Metropolitan police led the way in the UK by having some police officers specialized in the use of firearms, rather than training and arming everybody on a just-in-case basis. This system has worked well for London in the context of armed preparedness - protecting high profile people and places - and it also works well when an armed operation is planned for. It works less well when the need is to react to an incident quickly; all too often, Mike Waldren points out the difficulties created by authorization for the use of firearms being held at a senior (and often inaccessible) level and thus the responsibility of people who aren't on the ground and in many cases probably weren't trained in the fine art of figuring out what needed to be done. A side-bar issue is that unarmed officers still find themselves encountering armed suspects, as they can't plan ahead for such things happening.
This book works very well as a lasting tribute to the men and women who have made speciality armed policing work in London. The author inadvertently exposes the insularity of police firearms training in the UK - despite the enormous amount of literature devoted to the subject, (not to mention the number of world-class experts they could have consulted) the Met's finest only seem to have read one book -
Shooting to Live - and then closed the doors to all outside input. He also exposes the lies told by politicians after the Hungerford and Dunblane murders. It is very clear from his accounts that ending civilians having licensed firearms has had no impact whatever on the armed crime problems that his colleagues still face.