Both this opening effort and the second `Aristotle Poetics' caught my eye whilst browsing the mystery section one day so I thought I'd give them a try. `Detective' is written in a somewhat languid style, aiming to achieve murder sleuthing through peripatetic analysis. Indeed, from the point Stephanos (nephew to the exiled major suspect Philemon, as denounced by Boutades nephew, Polygnotos) goes to his old mentor for assistance we are given a drilling in sleuthing based on logical thought, rather than physical fact. From the opening reluctance, but required first step, to prove Philemon's innocence using the Aunt Eudoxia principal (proof of a negative) to the .... we are stepped through the murder.
The year is 332 BC, Alexander has just destroyed Tyre and is marching on Egypt. The premise of the novel concerns one of the Athenian triachs - Boutos, by name - who is found murdered ina most unusual way (for an Athenian) in that he was killed by an arrow fired into his study. Fairly quickly we are presented with some people with a motive, from his abused wife, to the apparently insane Arkhimenos as we seek to find the real character of Boutades underneath the carefully crafted veneer that was presented to Athenian society. Stephanos spends the opening sections of the novel between the first and second prodikasia attempting to find proof that Philemon was not present in Athens, spending time disguised at the Peiraieus as a countryman in order to glean from sailors and local people snippets of information about Philemon's movements after his departure from Athens. On the trail of his cousin we locate a hidden wife complete with surpise nephew for Stephanos, undergo several clandestine trips in the dark where our hero gets attacked twice and undergo social ostracism from the higher echelons of Athenian society. Eventually, Philemon turns up to provide some necessary information about the events of the night and in a classically Ciceronian manner Stephanos declaims the true murderer, after some coaching in his oratorical delivery by Aristotle, at the trial.
This is not a bad stab at a first murder mystery though it appears that the attempt to provide a classically accurate picture of Athenian law is detrimental to the actual plot. The eventual denouement is weak, based on little evidence, more a case of shocking the culprit(s) into an admission of guilt. You get the feeling a brazen person might yet have got away with it. Nevertheless it was sufficiently thought provoking and the development of Aristotle entertaining enough to ensure that `Poetics' and the new `Secrets of Life' is read. I suspect it will only improve as our characters develop.