This is a good, fast read - unusual in the field of architectural studies - in which the author reviews some of the most abnormal buildings produced in the last 30 years, and offers a Thucydidean pre-history to try and account for them. That's not an easy call: it requires Glendinning to explain buildings that are the product of what he calls architecture's "semi-detached" relationship with power, and the raising of important and too-often unasked questions about who's actually responsible for buildings: the architect or the client?
Glendinning's view is that a culture of communalism that gave architecture a valuable coherence even in its most despised periods - Victoriana and 20th-century Modern - has finally broken down, leaving the landscape wrecked by vulgar, unnecessarily expensive, attention-seeking would-be icons. His tone is critical, sometimes bordering on outrage: at the head of his list of villains are, of course, Frank Gehry and Zaha Hadid, and he blames Rem Koolhaas's writings for the climate in which their works have thrived.
Out of this chaos he attempts to find some consolation, however, and for that, he ends up praising the civic planning of modern Hong Kong and Shanghai.
This is an excellent essay - selective, inevitably, in imitating the very focus on high-status monuments that he rightly blames the architectural media for - but as a structured explanation of numerous factors that had not previously been brought together, it's well worth reading.