I thought quite well of this book until about three quarters of the way through. At this point, having analysed with intellectual acuity and verbal fluency a representative sample of postMarxist approaches to the conundrum of how to dismantle capitalism, Gilbert arrived at the part of the book where he has to come up with a proposed way forward, or at least summarise others' attempts in this area.
At this point he latched on to the myth, as he sees it, of pastoral England, claiming that it never really existed, and quoting as evidence a text by Georgina Boyne which doesn't show up either on Amazon or Google books. He seems to think that anything which occurred before the Industrial Revolution is so ancient that it can have no bearing on anything.
Having established that he then nevertheless uses the popularity of this myth to suggest that it be a basis for spinning a new revolutionary myth which could captivate the revolutionary classes in their bid to put up barricades.
I would have thought that after 13 years of New Labour we had all had enough of spin.
As I say Gilbert is bright and fluent but he is so caught up with his 57 varieties of Marxism that he ignores history - which Marx after all didn't.
Nevertheless a useful reference source if you want to know something about Gramsci, Adorno, Hardt and Negri etc etc without having to read them.