3 of 4 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
Islam Anthropology, 2 Feb 2010
By William Garrison Jr. - Published on Amazon.com
This review is from: The Anthropology Of Islam (Paperback)
For anthropological students of Islam, the author opines: "I shall suggest that emotions and feelings should be at the centre of our studies of Islam" rather than over-emphasizing the concept that the Islamic religion defines what a Muslim is (p.6). The author rebukes the idea that there is a `Muslim mind theory' - it is a fallacy that argues "that religion induces Muslims to believe, behave, act, think, argue and develop their identity as Muslims despite their disparate heritages, ethnicities, nationalities, experiences, gender, sexual orientations and, last but not least, mind." Essentially, the author argues that the environment influences the development of a Muslim, rather than the Islamic religion. The author notes that there have been few `Islamic anthropologists' (some the author acknowledges to be include: Geertz, Gellner, Gilsenan & von Grunebaum -- amongst others). To get some idea regarding the split between anthropologists, the author wrote: "Gellner is not interested in understanding Muslims; rather, like Geertz, he believed he had provided the ultimate explanation of Islam as a cultural system (p.38)." The author argues that Islam is not monolithic. The author implores that anthropological students study the different methodologies used in the sociological analysis of Islam in seeking answers to `what is the anthropology of Islam?" -- just studying the Quran or undertaking fieldwork, too ? The author contends that: "Asad has proposed the blueprint that this discipline lacked" (p.41) - I won't give away Talal Asad's proposal [his 22-page book is available as a free download from Georgetown Univ.]. Can there `properly' be Muslim lesbians? (p.131) -- based on Islamic culture or Islamic religion? One really isn't going to learn anything about Islam within this paperback, it is more about how the author urges students of Islamic anthropology to understand the different anthropological approaches in studying Islam. A good thought-provoking book, but I believe the author downplays how the Islamic religion influences the `Muslim mind.' The author notes Daniel Pipes but ignores Robert Spencer.