I now own 2 study Apocryphas: one from Cambridge and this one from Oxford. Why bother reviewing them, you might ask...
The reason for the review is that there is a considerable difference between this volume and its Cambridge counterpart (ISBN 0521508754).
The introductions to each of the books, to be found at the start of each book, is concise but detailed and in proportion to the length of the book it is introducing. The content is explained and there is a brief outline. Unfortunately this outline is not presented in a way which is visually appealing - it is just normal text. Here Cambridge scores better by making use of a tabular format for the outlines.
The NRSV text is printed in two columns and is large (approx 9 points). The annotations are at the foot of the page in a single column in a 7 point (approx) font.
The annotations give a lot of background information to help place the main text in a historical perspective. Where necessary, references to other bible books are given. The annotations will not tell you how to interpret the text but they will give you greater insight. In this respect they are far more detailed than the Cambridge publication.
Where necessary, maps are placed in the text, e.g. page 262.
Oxford publishes an anglicized version of the NRSV which is ideal for those who stumble over americanisms. This Study Apocrypha is not anglicized at all. A missed opportunity.
The list of contributors is quite impressive, offering more depth of knowledge than notes from just one person.
Plus points:
- large text
- detailed notes
- maps in the text where necessary
- book introductions at the start of the relevant books
- annotations for each book written by an expert on that book
Minus points:
- no cross-reference column
- book outlines visually unappealing
- text in US English
- no room for your own notes in the margins
- complete lack of section headings within the text
An interesting point, in closing: compare the annotations for the following passages in both Oxford and Cambrdige: Esther 11:2 and 1Macc 8:31-32 and you will find that they are the complete opposite of each other! Who is right? We may never know.
Who wins the annotation race? I'll leave that up to you to decide.