Most Helpful Customer Reviews
3 of 3 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Surprisingly creepy and spooky, 28 Nov 2002
I know that many horror fans hold this movie in low regard, but I found it gritty, disturbing, and genuinely scary. It’s not perfect, but I think it deserves five stars. For me, the whole fact or fiction debate is unimportant; I am judging this movie solely on its own merits. The makers of the film may have had a limited budget, but they doggedly pulled out all of the stops; maybe they went overboard once or twice, but that is quite OK with me, given what they did achieve. Naturally, the house itself with its baleful eye-like windows, does much to set the table for a feast of fright, but the makers were not content to depend on the house alone. The point-of-view shots from the viewpoint of the evil essence work wonderfully; the use of unusual, oddly-angled perspectives was highly effective; and the supernatural manifestations were never allowed to overshadow the real story of the family’s tragedy. The acting was not particularly accomplished in general, with the mother in particular guilty of overacting, but Jack Magner as Sonny and Diane Franklin as Patricia give outstanding performances in very different roles. Sonny’s evolution from wholesome yet troubled young man to demonic mass murderer is a little rushed and was necessarily trying both physically and mentally on the young actor, but Magner keeps this movie from becoming wholly unbelievable and laughable. Franklin also deserves much credit for her portrayal of the wholesome yet haunted younger sister of Sonny; she alone invites sympathy from the viewer and makes the events of the fateful night of horror truly disturbing. Apparently, the makeup artists for this picture were told to just go crazy. For the most part, the special effects are very good, although the extent of physical transformations we witness in Sonny are probably somewhat excessive. This only becomes problematic toward the exorcism scenes at the end. The music is also an important and effective part of this movie experience, although at times it reminded me of Star Trek music. Much has been made of the incest storyline, but I feel it is important to note that there is no graphic exploitation of this controversial theme. In fact, that aspect of the movie makes the tragedy all the more dramatic and compelling. The key to this movie’s winning me over was the concentration on family issues; to call this family dysfunctional is perhaps an understatement. The gore is there at times, but it is not the focus of the storyline—if anything, it takes away from rather than adds to the impact of the film on the viewer. It is also unfortunate but perfectly understandable that this film is compared so closely to The Exorcist. Certainly, the latter parts of the movie are weaker than the first half, and it is pretty obvious that the whole exorcism storyline reflected an attempt by the filmmakers to somewhat selfishly usurp the notoriety of The Exorcist. There are, however, many differences between this film and The Exorcist, and taken on its own merits I found the relevant scenes powerful and effective. I agree that the movie goes downhill somewhat after the pivotal murders actually take place, but I can honestly say that the first hour of this movie represents some of the most creepiest, spine-tingling moments in the annals of cinematic horror.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
9 of 10 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
A true feat of cinematography which has set the standards, 21 May 2000
By A Customer
One of the BEST horror films EVER! If not, 'THE' best. The film portrays TRUE events that happened in a real town called Amityville, Long Island NY in 1975. "In a middle class, sleepy little town, a boy named Ronald Defeo, 'out of the blue', shoots to death all 6 members of his entire family in their sleep. The house is only a couple of meters away from the houses next door, and yet no shots were heard. The gun used was a high-powered rifle! The boy is arrested and sentenced to life. End of story. Until, 1 year later the Lutz family moves into the house (the man uncannily looks very much like the murderer), only to move out 28 days later claiming that the house is (demonically) haunted. The Lutz's story became worldwide news, and completely overshadowed the DeFeo story. The Lutz's wrote a book called 'The Amityville Horror' about their ordeal, then a film was made, based on the book, also called 'The Amityville Horror'." This is a sequel to the Lutz's 'The Amityville Horror', but actually tells the story the Defeo's. The movie offers a different perspective from the conventional facts. In the movie, shortly after the family moves in, subtle supernatural things start to happen. This, though, leads the father to turn violent, and domestic troubly start. A priest is asked to bless the house, but when he comes he soon wishes that he hadn't. One dark night the eldest boy, when in The house all alone, is violently possessed by something very evil. Over a period of time the boys attitude and appearance start to change for the worse, he then has incest with his sister, and finally he murders his entire family. The cinematography in this film is in a class of it's own. A true feat that has set the standards, which no other horror film has managed; (with the exception of the original, 'The Amityville Horror', and 'The Exorcist'). The movie is well made in every respect and the acting in outstanding. The house itself, that the movie was filmed in, is enough to give you creeps. It's the second most spookiest house I've seen; the original house is The spookiest. The achievement is the atmosphere and vibe that this movie manages to produce- something uncannily REAL... Nuff said. Watch it! p.s Don't listen to any bad reviews you might hear about it.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
1 of 1 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
Murder and Possession at 112 Ocean Avenue., 5 Oct 2011
This review is from: Amityville 2 - the Posession [DVD] (DVD)
Amityville II: The Possession is directed by Damiano Damiani and co-adapted to screenplay by Tommy Lee Wallace and Dardano Sacchetti from the Hans Holzer novel, Murder in Amityville. It stars James Olson, Burt Young, Rutanya Alda, Jack Magner and Diane Franklin. Music is scored by Lalo Schifrin and cinematography by Franco Di Giacomo.
Film is essentially a prequel to The Amityville Horror that was released in 1979. This is loosely based on the real life DeFeo family who were murdered at 112 Ocean Avenue by Ronald DeFeo Jr. On November 13th 1974.
In spite of mixed critical and horror fan reaction, Amityville II was a success at the box office and does in fact have a fan base that believes it is easily the best film of the franchise. Now that may not be saying much since the first film, which is often considered the best of the bunch, isn't exactly great horror anyway, but Amityville 2, in spite of its obvious flaws, does contain good ideas and moments of genuine spooky unease. The main problem with the film, apart from Alda's woeful acting that is, is that it cribs its last quarter from the most revered of horror films, The Exorcist. Even to someone like me, who isn't particularly struck with The Exorcist's popularity, can acknowledge that any sort of imitation of that films central conflict is going to pale in comparison. However, for those who like their horror to be about creepy houses and a haunting of some kind, then there is much to enjoy in this prequel.
From the off the tone is set as we hear the creepy strains of cherubic warbles, the house, with its distinctive Dutch Colonial face, homes into view and then it's the introduction of the Montelli family, a family soon to be terrorised by one of their own after a demon is released and takes possession of the eldest son. Build up is standard stuff as a series of strange occurrences begin to unsettle the already unstable Montelli family (father is a brutish oaf, mother is overtly religious), particularly a weird animal drawing that presents itself on the young children's bedroom wall. Then once the demon identifies its target and begins its stalking process, film shifts from creepy haunting into violent terror, with the added kickers of an incestuous relationship and the introduction of a stoic bastion of religion courtesy of Olson's Father Adamsky. The effects and make up work seem tame by today's standards, but they are very effective regardless, and Schifrin has a good ear for tonal horror shifts.
It's hardly a masterpiece for sure, and some of it creaks for the wrong reasons, but it hits the right notes for the sub-genre of horror it sits in. 6.5/10
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
|