Start reading Against the Modern World on your Kindle in under a minute. Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here.

Deliver to your Kindle or other device

 
 
 

Try it free

Sample the beginning of this book for free

Deliver to your Kindle or other device

Read books on your computer or other mobile devices with our FREE Kindle Reading Apps.
Against the Modern World: Traditionalism and the Secret Intellectual History of the Twentieth Century
 
 

Against the Modern World: Traditionalism and the Secret Intellectual History of the Twentieth Century [Kindle Edition]

Mark Sedgwick
3.6 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (7 customer reviews)

Digital List Price: £15.12 What's this?
Print List Price: £15.99
Kindle Price: £12.10 includes VAT* & free wireless delivery via Amazon Whispernet
You Save: £3.89 (24%)
Unlike print books, digital books are subject to VAT.

Formats

Amazon Price New from Used from
Kindle Edition £12.10  
Hardcover £37.05  
Paperback £15.19  

Product Description

Review

Sedgwick's scholarship regarding Traditionalists themselves is exhaustive and admirable ... Sedgwick contributes an introduction and overview of an otherwise little-known, but important, moment in modern intellectual history. (Colin Beech, Journal of World History )

... a wealth of information on the lives of the Traditionalists ... This book is a valuable companion to their works, a comprehensive and neutrally presented archive of the personalities and authors, along with their political activities and personal lives. (Financial Times Magazine - Weekend )

Against the Modern World is a valuable and comprehensive effort by a non-Traditionalist to chronicle this fascinating and often troubling movement in its entirety. (Financial Times Magazine - Weekend )

Product Description

The first history of Traditionalism, an important yet surprisingly little-known twentieth-century anti-modern movement. Comprising a number of often secret but sometimes very influential religious groups in the West and in the Islamic world, it affected mainstream and radical politics in Europe and the development of the field of religious studies in the United States.
In the nineteenth century, at a time when progressive intellectuals had lost faith in Christianity's ability to deliver religious and spiritual truth, the West discovered non-Western religious writings. From these beginnings grew Traditionalism, emerging from the occultist milieu of late nineteenth-century France, and fed by the widespread loss of faith in progress that followed the First World War. Working first in Paris and then in Cairo, the French writer Ren� Gu�non rejected modernity as a dark age, and sought to reconstruct the Perennial Philosophy-- the central religious truths behind all the major world religions --largely on the basis of his reading of Hindu religious texts.
A number of disenchanted intellectuals responded to Gu�non's call with attempts to put theory into practice. Some attempted without success to guide Fascism and Nazism along Traditionalist lines; others later participated in political terror in Italy. Traditionalism finally provided the ideological cement for the alliance of anti-democratic forces in post-Soviet Russia, and at the end of the twentieth century began to enter the debate in the Islamic world about the desirable relationship between Islam and modernity

Product details

  • Format: Kindle Edition
  • File Size: 3556 KB
  • Print Length: 385 pages
  • Page Numbers Source ISBN: 0195152972
  • Publisher: Oxford University Press, USA (6 May 2004)
  • Sold by: Amazon Media EU S.à r.l.
  • Language English
  • ASIN: B000YHAWO8
  • Text-to-Speech: Enabled
  • Average Customer Review: 3.6 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (7 customer reviews)
  • Amazon Bestsellers Rank: #293,338 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
  •  Would you like to give feedback on images?


More About the Author

Mark J. Sedgwick
Discover books, learn about writers, and more.

Visit Amazon's Mark J. Sedgwick Page

Tag this product

 (What's this?)
Think of a tag as a keyword or label you consider is strongly related to this product.
Tags will help all customers organise and find favourite items.
Your tags: Add your first tag
 

Customer Reviews

Most Helpful Customer Reviews
5 of 5 people found the following review helpful
Format:Hardcover
Note that the Michael Fitzgerald written about in the review below by Peter Kristofferson is not, in fact, a Catholic archbishop but rather the traditionalist author and scholar Michael Oren Fitzgerald.
Comment | 
Was this review helpful to you?
4 of 4 people found the following review helpful
By Gogol TOP 1000 REVIEWER VINE™ VOICE
Format:Paperback|Amazon Verified Purchase
I agree with a previous reviewer that the reviews of this book seem to fall into 2 camps, either traditionalists (Who all give the book 1 star but fail to give any substance as to why) And opponents who give it 5 starts (But again, largely lack content as to why give the book such praise) Hopefully as neither a traditionalist or an opponent my review can be a little more balanced.

First of all many of the critics of the book seem to refer to an online review of the book by a Christian traditionalist (You can find it cut and paste in a few of the below reviews) So I will base a large part of my review around that. The main criticism of the reviewer concerning this book is that in his opinion Sedgwick has 1. A hidden agenda against traditionalist which he was not honest about when writing the book. 2. He is only a recent convert to Islam (This being back in the 90s) And so has little knowledge of Islam (One could as how a Christian priest came to such a remarkable conclusion but thats another matter) and 3. That Sedgwick follows a narrow interpretation of Islam (Based on his recent conversion and his bad experience with Sufism)

Addressing the first point this seems to have come about from the author confronting Martin Lings about a spiritual crisis he suffered on joining the Haqqani Naqshbandi order regarding "Love for a Sheikh" Lings is reported to have replied that love of the Sheikh is a must (Presumably the answer he was not looking for) And this has resulted in a grudge against all traditionalists (Something I find very hard to believe) The second and third points seem to stem from Sedgwick pointing out the rather lax practice of Islam amongst the followers particularly of Schoun in France both during and after WW2. For example their lack of prayer, fasting etc which the author sees as both a departure from Islamic practice itself and in particual from the Alawi Sufi order to which the said they belonged. The critic of Sedgwick quotes from the book a passage regarding a Sheikh who was fasting while in the desert and being enticed to drink water by a voice from above refuses claiming this is the devil trying to tempt him and God would never allow him to do what is forbidden. The critic seems to believe that this is proof of the authors narrow view of Islam without presumably realising that the story of the Shaikh is none other that the Sufi Shaikh Abdul Qadr Jilani! Again this idea that anyone who is critical of traditionalism has some narrow fundamentalist interpretation of Islam is something of a red herring. Nuh Ha Mim Keller a Sufi Shaikh of the Shadhili order has been a vocal critic of the group (See his book "Reliance of the traveller") He has pointed out how traditionalists such as Chittick and others have deliberately miss quoted the books of ibn Arabi and Abdul Qadir Jaziri to fit their needs. Martin Lings was criticised because in the early editions of his biography of Muhammad he narrated that Muhammad put a protective hand over an image of Abraham in the Kaba when all other idols and images were removed (Based upon one very weak narration, a story that contradicts all traditional understanding of Islam) In another words, it becomes clear that far from traditionalism being the authentic expression of Islam and Sufism its something of a western extension of it that has drifted on its own way.

Sedgwick begins his study with Guenon and the meaning of traditionalism. In this he is not entirely clear in his explanation however his biography of Guenon is of some interest. It would seem that Guenon in particularly on his settlement in Egypt did indeed live out the rest of his life as a practicing Muslim though interestingly enough one who did not know classical Arabic and one who it would seem had not read a great deal of classical Islamic literature. It is also of interest that Sheikh Abdul Halim Mahmud, a man who is often quoted in traditionalist circles seems to have never read a book of traditionalism and his endorsement of it stems from nothing more than support of practicing western Muslims both in his native Egypt and Europe. Schoun is something different and Sedgwick is quite right in that its almost unheard of that a Sufi order should take an entirely differnet direction as the Alawi order in Europe did. His biography of Schoun is intriguing and it would be no surprise that traditionalists are so critical of the book seeing as much of their hidden belief and practice is now exposed for public view.

Where I think Sedgwick fails however is his link between traditionalism and Fascism. The links between Guenon and Evola is weak to say the least. In fact the link seems to be nothing more than Evola happened to have read a few books by him. It would be like finding the books of Kipling amongst Stalins books and claiming a link between Kipling and Stalin! Another point is if Sedgwick was trying to claim that there was some traditionalist attempt at world domination through our universities and schools then he failed quite badly in this book. Traditionalist are almost unheard of amongst Christians and Muslims alike. He even points out himself that while Merton may be popular or while some Sufis who became Butichichi's after reading Guenons books its highly unlikely that traditionalism influenced that order or those readers to any great extent. What traditionalism and Sedgwick seem to forget is you cant implant a 50 odd year old tradition on a 1400 year old religion and expect to have much success.

All in all in interesting read. As one quote on the back of the book says "You will never see the allusion to the "Trancendental unity of religions" in quite the same light again"
Comment | 
Was this review helpful to you?
2 of 2 people found the following review helpful
Format:Paperback
If I were writing a book on Traditionalism, I would consider each of the main figures in the movement -- Guénon, Schuon, and Coomaraswamy -- and show what their views were, how they came to hold them, and how they justified them. I would then conclude by looking at their legacy, both in the Traditionalist movement and in the wider intellectual world. So what has Dr Sedgwick done?

It is very difficult to get a clear idea of their philosophy from his book, because the whole thing is embedded in an excess of biographical detail. We learn why Guénon's PhD thesis was rejected, which schools, he taught at, and what his house in Cairo looked like; it all gets in the way.

The author also devotes too much space to peripheral figures, such as Evola and Dugin. Traditionalism is a largely religious movement, but Evola was basically a political thinker of the far right; he owed far more to Nietzsche than to Guénon. As for Dugin, the chief reason for including him seems to be that it gives the author a chance to give a highly-coloured description of a secret meeting in Moscow to get things off to a rousing start. As Sedgwick wrote to Fitzgerald "I'll be honest: one has to dress things up slightly.." Exactly.

If you want to learn about Traditionalism, read the originals. For only a couple of pounds more, you could get "The Essential Frithjof Schuon" or "Underlying Religion, by Lings and Minaar".
Comment | 
Was this review helpful to you?

Popular Highlights

 (What's this?)
&quote;
Counterinitiation is the inversion of initiation, but inversion is not restricted to questions of initiation. In its fully developed Guenonian form, inversion is seen as an all-pervasive characteristic of modernity. While all that really matters is in fact in decline, people foolishly suppose that they see progress. &quote;
Highlighted by 3 Kindle users

Customer Discussions

This product's forum
Discussion Replies Latest Post
No discussions yet

Ask questions, Share opinions, Gain insight
Start a new discussion
Topic:
First post:
Prompts for sign-in
 


Active discussions in related forums
Search Customer Discussions
Search all Amazon discussions
   
Related forums


Look for similar items by category


Look for similar items by subject


Amazon Media EU S.à r.l. GB Privacy Statement Amazon Media EU S.à r.l. GB Delivery Information Amazon Media EU S.à r.l. GB Returns & Exchanges