From the outset of this book the authors are on the defensive, claiming that the ``Aerofax style'' precludes them from producing ``a truly in-depth account'' of the Victor. Oh dear...
A summary of the postwar HP jet bomber projects moves into discussing the aero-isoclinic wing and thence into a logical sequence of prototypes, variants, recce and tanker conversions, civil projects and the missile carrier proposals. A brief operational overview and structural description are capped by the best part of the book, recounting first-hand experiences of flying the Victor.
As with their previous work on the Meteor, Butler & Buttler have relied heavily on the National Archives and RAF Museum, along with the Handley Page Association. Although this provides a solid base of research they appear to shy from looking outside those sources to answer some questions which they themselves raise. There are also some awkward chunks of text recycled from previous publications ( such as Aviation News and RAF Historical Society ) though to the authors' credit they note this in the narrative. Still, the change of tone is noticeable and disrupts the flow of narrative.
The book is packed with photographs, overwhelmingly so and to the detriment of the text which is contorted around the images. Quite why eleven images of the HP.88 in various poses are required is unstated, and if you enjoy endless shots of Victors refuelling a variety of guests then this is your book, though don't expect much enlightenment from the unhelpful captions.
Unfortunately despite relying on the HPA archives we still don't have a definitive through-the-windscreen action shot. Could the aircrew actually see the runway?
The book concludes with 24 pages of colour images, most previously unseen by me, though the three cover photographs are all repeated herein.
A reasonable compendium of Victor history and variants, but far from the definitive history of the aircraft. Side-by-side with Eric Morgan's Valiant Aerofax, Butler & Buttler's volume is by far the weakest, feeling more like a pot pourri of facts and photographs than an integrated and deeply-researched history.