Dismantling the Empire: America's Last Best Hope and over 2 million other books are available for Amazon Kindle . Learn more
FREE Delivery in the UK.
In stock.
Dispatched from and sold by Amazon.
Gift-wrap available.
Aep: Dismantling The Empi... has been added to your Basket
+ £2.80 UK delivery
Used: Very Good | Details
Sold by thriftbooks-USA
Condition: Used: Very Good
Comment: All items ship from the USA.  Arrival time is usually 2-3 weeks. This copy shows very minor wear. Spend Less. Read More. Your satisfaction is guaranteed.
Have one to sell?
Flip to back Flip to front
Listen Playing... Paused   You're listening to a sample of the Audible audio edition.
Learn more
See all 3 images

Aep: Dismantling The Empire (American Empire Project) Paperback – 29 Mar 2011

3 customer reviews

See all 8 formats and editions Hide other formats and editions
Amazon Price New from Used from
Kindle Edition
"Please retry"
"Please retry"
£5.83 £2.22
£11.99 FREE Delivery in the UK. In stock. Dispatched from and sold by Amazon. Gift-wrap available.

Frequently Bought Together

Aep: Dismantling The Empire (American Empire Project) + Blowback + Nemesis: Last Days of the American Republic (American Empire Project)
Price For All Three: £38.68

Buy the selected items together

Product details

  • Paperback: 228 pages
  • Publisher: Metropolitan (29 Mar. 2011)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 0805094237
  • ISBN-13: 978-0805094237
  • Product Dimensions: 12.7 x 1.3 x 20.3 cm
  • Average Customer Review: 5.0 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (3 customer reviews)
  • Amazon Bestsellers Rank: 1,066,478 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

More About the Author

Discover books, learn about writers, and more.

Product Description


"Stimulating and prescient. . ."--"Times Literary Supplement" "Succinct, hard-hitting attacks on what the author perceives as America's ruinous imperial follies..."--"Publishers Weekly," starred review "Concise, clear, hard-hitting. . . "Dismantling the Empire "is a must read for anyone looking for meaningful information concerning the future of the American Empire."--"Foreign Policy Journal" Praise for Chalmers Johnson"Johnson wants the scales to fall from American eyes so that the nation can see the truth about its role in the world. His is a patriot's passion: his motive is to save the American republic he loves."--Jonathan Freedland, "The New York Review of Books" "The role of the prophet is an honorable one. In Chalmers Johnson the American empire has found its Jeremiah. He deserves to be heard."--Andrew J. Bacevich, "The Washington Post Book World" "Chalmers Johnson's important new book is something with which everyone who aspires to a worthwhile opinion about this country's future must contend."--"The Los Angeles Times" (on "Nemesis") "Trenchantly argued, comprehensively documented, grimly eloquent. . . Worthy of the republic it seeks to defend."--"The Boston Globe" (on "The Sorrows of Empire") "Stunning and shocking. . . "Blowback" is a wake-up call for America."--John Dower, Pulitzer Prize-winning author of "Embracing Defeat"

About the Author

Chalmers Johnson, president of the Japan Policy Research Institute, is the author of the bestselling books "Blowback," "The Sorrows of Empire," and "Nemesis," which make up his Blowback Trilogy. He has written for the "Los Angeles Times," the "London Review of Books," "Harper's Magazine," "The Nation," and TomDispatch.com.

What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?

Customer Reviews

5.0 out of 5 stars
5 star
4 star
3 star
2 star
1 star
See all 3 customer reviews
Share your thoughts with other customers

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

11 of 11 people found the following review helpful By Luc REYNAERT TOP 1000 REVIEWER on 23 April 2011
Format: Hardcover Verified Purchase
Chalmers Johnson is an absolutely sincere patriot, who really wants to save his country from disaster. For him, the US has definitely to make a choice between democracy (a domestic republic) and empire (a foreign imperialist), because it is on the brink of losing its democracy for the sake of keeping its empire.

National policies
C. Johnson sees his country ruled by a hollowed out government. Privatization of governmental activities (public services) equals a dismantling of democratic rule and governmental responsibility. Unelected corporate officials (`mercenaries') working for profit-making corporations, have taken over governmental tasks: US governmental spending on defense, national security and social programs are siphoned to large corporations generating costs without oversight.
The US government implemented a Big Brother policy with its `Total Information Awareness Program', which could compile dossiers on 300 million people (credit card purchases, magazine subscriptions, medical prescriptions, web site visits, e-mails, bank deposits, trips, events attended).
Its insane gargantuan defense budget and low taxation levels on the rich are diverting resources from productive use (investments in education, healthcare and the environment).
Moreover, the US population is badly informed by its totally gagged private media conglomerates.

International policies
Internationally, C. Johnson sees an accelerating trend to militarism and dependence on the military-industrial complex. The US dominates the world through its military power (761 bases in 192 countries) and its intelligence personnel. From WW II until 9/11 there were more than 200 overseas military operations.
Read more ›
1 Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
3 of 3 people found the following review helpful By RBSProds TOP 1000 REVIEWER on 10 April 2012
Format: Hardcover
Five ENGROSSING Stars! In this series of up-to-date essays, author, historian, and political commentator Chalmers Johnson (Blowback, Second Edition: The Costs and Consequences of American Empire (American Empire Project) gives an up-to-date extensive investigative assessment of American's imperialistic tendencies and realities. In a very frank manner, he looks at recent American presidential administrations and their policies which have resulted in our far-flung empire of over 700 military bases consuming billions of dollars spent on personnel and equipment to sustain those bases and presumably our national interests and security. He also looks at how the military-industrial complex and Congress promote these activities in a form of false "military Keynesianism" that produces just the opposite effect of the overall success it promises the country and the economy, as our power and effectiveness actually wanes. At a time when the author says we have a smaller number of combat brigades, ships, and aircraft, the military budget is spiraling upwards, putting us in a position of "losing our democracy for the sake of keeping our empire" based on four dynamics: "isolation, overstretch, the uniting of local and global forces opposing imperialism, and in the end bankruptcy."

Beginning with the Clinton Administration and going through Obama's "war presidency", author Johnson takes stock of how we got into the current situation thru our hubristic idealism, our "imperial presidency", and the current, ultimate failure of constitutional checks and balances in reining in our expanding military budget. Beyond this we are facing "blowback" for our military adventurism from local and global forces opposing imperialism who have been directly and negatively impacted by the actions of the USA.
Read more ›
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
1 of 1 people found the following review helpful By William Podmore on 11 Aug. 2014
Format: Kindle Edition Verified Purchase
In this splendid book, American historian Chalmers Johnson calls for a huge cut in US military spending, for the CIA to be closed down, and for a noninterventionist US foreign policy.

As an illustration of how useless the CIA is, he notes that in 1950, the CIA dropped 212 agents into Manchuria. Within days, 101 had been killed and the other 111 had been captured.

Johnson reminds us that from 1849 to 1947, British governments sent military expeditions virtually every year to the Northwest Frontier, the border area between Afghanistan and Pakistan. In 1932, the British government used poison gas in Waziristan. But somehow, no British government ever won the hearts and minds of the Afghan people. US and British ‘surges’, ‘nation-building’, counter-insurgency, all meet the same fate.

The Department of Defense said it used $7.62 trillion (in 1982 dollars) in capital resources from 1947 to 1987. In 1985, the Department of Commerce valued US plant, equipment and infrastructure at just over $7.29 trillion. So the USA spends more on destroying things than on making things. US governments always claim that US military spending is good for the economy, although they always saw that Soviet military spending was bad for their economy.

The USA had 761 bases overseas (2008 figure), and 510,927 military personnel in 151 countries (2007 figure), costing $250 billion a year.

The USA backs military dictatorships across the world, including those which ran South Korea from 1960 to 1987, even when General Chun’s regime killed 2,000 pro-democracy demonstrators in Kwangju in 1980.
Read more ›
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again

Most Helpful Customer Reviews on Amazon.com (beta)

Amazon.com: 43 reviews
194 of 206 people found the following review helpful
Timely - 21 Aug. 2010
By Loyd E. Eskildson - Published on Amazon.com
Format: Hardcover
Chalmers Johnson is professor emeritus at the University of California, San Diego. Chalmers Johnson minces no words on his concerns with a U.S. overemphasis on the military. "The failure to begin to deal with our bloated military establishment and the profligate use of it in missions for which it is hopelessly inappropriate will . . . condemn the U.S. to . . . imperial overstretch, perpetual war, and insolvency, leading to a likely collapse similar to that of the former Soviet Union."

The 2008 Pentagon inventory includes 190,000 troops in 46 nations and territories, and 865 facilities in more than 40 countries and overseas U.S. territories. In just Japan, we have 99,295 connected to U.S. forces living there. The only purpose is to provide control over as many nations as possible. Britain, Germany, France, The Netherlands, and Japan have given up their empires, and we should too. Per Nick Turse ('The Complex: How the Military Invades our Everyday Lives') we could net $2.6 billion selling our base assets at Diego Garcia in the Indian Ocean and another $2.2 billion for Guantanamo Bay - just two of those facilities. The Pentagon also has 234 golf courses around the world, 70 Lear Jet airplanes for generals and admirals, a ski resort in the Bavarian Alps.

Meanwhile, we continue trying to pacify Afghanistan, seemingly oblivious to the fact that Britain and the Soviet Union previously failed. Even Pakistan cannot command the Pashtun tribes in its own area; worse yet, its army trains Taliban fighters in suicide attacks and orders them to fight American and NATO soldiers in Afghanistan, while extorting huge amounts of money from Saudi Arabia, Persian Gulf emirates, and the U.S. to train 'freedom fighters.' Our linkage, however, with anti-Muslim Israel and India makes full Pakistani commitment impossible.

Another problem is that our overseas troops often bring sexual violence against local women and girls, 83% of which were not punished between 2001-08 in Japan. Our uniformed 18-24 year-olds have become 'ugly ambassadors' for the U.S. around the globe. As for U.S. military females, 90% of the rapes are never reported.

Johnson asks "What harm would befall the U.S. if we closed those bases that we garrison around the world?" Our prior predictions of disaster (falling Asian dominoes) proved false after the Vietnam War, and it was Vietnam, not the U.S. that put an end to the murderous reign of Pol Pot in neighboring Cambodia. Imagining that China would want to start a war with the U.S., even over Taiwan, would mean a dramatic change of personality for that country. The author believes that no evidence exists to suggest U.S. efforts advance global peace - in fact, we make it less likely (eg. Iraq), and our weapons and tactics (eg. cluster bombs, 10 million unexploded mines in Afghanistan, and 'surgical strikes') enrage locals. As for why few of the world's billion+ Muslims like the U.S. - estimates range from 500,000 to 1 million Iraqi children were killed as an outgrowth of U.S. sanctions. Johnson also goes on to document U.S. blocking contracts to improve Iraqi water and other utilities just prior to our invasion. Then there are the matters of torture and secret renditions - how did these acts reduce terrorism?

Statistics compiled by the Federation of American Scientists analyzed by Gore Vidal show 201 military operations initiated by the U.S. against others between the end of WWII and 9/11 - none of which directly resulted in the creation of a democracy. These included Iran (1953, 1979), Guatemala (1954), Cuba (1959-present), Congo (1960), Brazil (1964), Indonesia (1965), Vietnam (1961-73), Laos (1961-73), Cambodia (1969-73), Greece (1967-73), Chile (1973), Afghanistan (1979-present), El Salvador, Guatemala, and Nicaragua (1980s), Iraq (1991-present), Panama (1989), Grenada (1983). (The Korean War is a notable positive exception.)

Another example - instead of radical demobilization after the Soviet Union's demise, we attempted to shore up Cold War structures in Europe, Asia, and Latin America, and repeatedly irritated both Russia and China. Space has become militarized. Per Johnson, Carter's national security adviser Zbigniew Brzezinski and former CIA director Gates made it clear that U.S. aid to the mujaheddin began six months prior to the Soviet invasion, and helped provoke it.

The author recommends cutting the number of dependents, mercenaries, and civilians stationed overseas, along with their expensive facilities, stop being the world's largest exporter of arms and munitions and educating Third World militaries in torture and coups, abolish ROTC (militarizes campuses) and the CIA (history of dismal intelligence and operational failures), and bring our troops home.

Though not included in "Dismantling the Empire," a recent 'Newsweek' article also pointed out waste in the Pentagon - Secretary Gates estimates there are 30 levels between himself and line officers, and expects by 2020 for the U.S. to have 'only' 20X China's number of advanced stealth fighters; other researchers recently found 530 deputy assistant secretaries of defense, compared to 78 in 1960.

Bottom-Line: Chalmers Johnson wishes he could be more optimistic about the future; unfortunately, he believes it is time to lower the flag on the 'American Century' (actually only 70 years - 1940-2010). I would also suggest we stop supporting Israel - an enormous burden that has led to the Arab Oil Embargo, 9/11, and our current never-ending War on Terror in Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Yemen, Somalia, and endless Homeland Security often bufoonish efforts to accomplish the impossible - 'terrorist-proof' America.
73 of 80 people found the following review helpful
Chalmers Johnson has provided insight for years. Now I listen carefully 29 Aug. 2010
By Afia - Published on Amazon.com
Format: Audio CD Verified Purchase
Professor Chalmers Johnson, a Korean War veteran and former CIA consultant, obviously is well-informed. This review is based on the unabridged audio CD.

Chalmers has the catchiest book titles: Blowback: The Costs and Consequences of American Empire; The Sorrows of Empire: Militarism, Secrecy, and the End of the Republic; Nemesis: The Last Days of the American Republic; and now Dismantling the Empire: America's Last Best Hope. His stature as an author, critic of U.S. foreign policy and declinist has grown with his audience.

In summary, Chalmers presents a well-researched and well-reasoned argument that the U.S. has to urgently scale back its commitments around the world, including withdrawal from military bases abroad, to save its democracy. The alternative appears to be bankruptcy and some form of dictatorship. It's not difficult to imagine either when listening to Chalmers' calm presentation of the facts.

Retreat from any type of venture is never easy. Yet Chalmers is calling on the U.S. to retreat from Empire. The listener would have benefited from examples of empires that deliberately and methodically scaled down - if for no other reason than to be assured it is possible. Observance of current events does not provide encouragement that any of Chalmers' recommendations will be followed.

I recommend this book not because there is any likelihood that policy will be informed by it, but because it may help prepare the listener/reader for what lies ahead. The arguments presented herein can't hurt you.
57 of 64 people found the following review helpful
Not Up to the Nemesis Trilogy 16 Oct. 2010
By Richard J. Gibson - Published on Amazon.com
Format: Hardcover Verified Purchase
I have read, reviewed, and urged Johnson's work on others for years, going back to his work on peasant nationalism vs communism. This time, however, I am saddened to make a case that this book can be skipped. Of course, any critic of Johnson stands on a land mine of his prescience but in this case, I feel quite safe. Why does one read him? In the first place, to learn from his incredibly skillful research methods which are, sad to say, absent here. No footnotes. Check for yourself before you buy, on p197. The footnotes are online only and may have disappeared. Secondly, we read Johnson for his wit and razor like critique, which is here, but for the most part, it has been elsewhere, online at TomDispatch. That is doubly no fair when he criticizes others for the same thing in his Dismantling text. Moreover, Johnson softens in this book his sharp analysis of fascism in the US, which appears all the time elsewhere. Next, we read Johnson for his insider knowledge, perhaps most of it drawn from his days as a CIA asset. This is here too. But it's just not as keen. Dismantle the Empire? Like the British? Probably not. The US does not have the Brits to hide behind. But Johnson, a die-hard anti-Marxist and something of a patriot (maybe he picked that up from mentor Hannah Arendt who could well have recruited him to the CIA and bear in mind that his Marxism is always conflated with Sovietism or Maoism)still insists that imperialism is hubris mixed with militarism. It is far more than that. It is the birth twin of capital. It is necessary to the socio-economic system as it searches for cheap labor, raw material, markets and regional control. Anti-Marxism seems to be the reason that Johnson winds up with two suggestions on what to do, equally untenable for most people: leave the US and take your cat, or, Dismantle the empire. Every other book Johnson has written is much better and I urge you to buy and learn from every one of them. That's a demonstration of my respect as well as my hope that this review does not cost him or his wife a dime.
12 of 12 people found the following review helpful
More Evidence of The Failures Of Imperial USA 14 Sept. 2010
By Donald A. Collins - Published on Amazon.com
Format: Hardcover Verified Purchase
This author, Chalmers Johnson, has a long history of being right about how US foreign policies have been badly flawed for decades. He broght up to date the term Blowback which was first mentioned in a CIA report in 1953, but most certainly was symbolized by 911.

This book recaps the record and suggests it is vital that we review the history of flawed outcomes from our imperial war-making and our world wide web of military bases that constitute an empire.

Ever since the American Presidency became truly imperial under LBJ, we have been treated to an endless parade of majestic media images--meetings, speeches and other events which likely would have made Mark Twain cringe. We increasingly kowtow to the office as if its occupant were somehow operating under the Divine Right of Kings.

But how have our Imperial Presidents performed on national security?

Truly badly. Pushed by the fear of not appearing strong on national defense, one by one they felt into the arms of the arms manufacturers who were the darlings of our military.

A number of other writers have eloquently echoed Johnson's perspicacious prognostications about building our empire. For example, Andrew Bacevich in his book, Washington Rules: America's Path To Permanent War, describes the role of two key architects of that empire: Allen Dulles, who planned the Bay of Pigs disaster (which cost him his job), and General Curtis LeMay who drove the Strategic Air Command to obtain nuclear weapons could have blown the planet to smithereens many times over.

Bacevich's book by a 20-year military officer, now a professor at Boston University, ranges over the decades since WWII to describe the process whereby America became an Empire, developing what Bacevich calls the "sacred trinity"--global military presence, global power projection and global intervention as exemplified by Korea, Vietnam and finally the Bush-contrived "preventive war" in Iraq.

Another author who dedicates the book to Johnson, The American Way of War: How Bush's Wars Became Obama's, by Tom Engelhardt, offers a little-heralded paperback masterpiece of only 216 pages which should enlighten anyone who has not already come to the sad conclusion that the US has turned into a dangerous empire.

From its first line, author Engelhardt sets the tragic scene: ''War is Peace' was one of the memorable slogans on the facade of the Ministry of Truth or Minitrue in 'Newspeak' the language invented by George Orwell in 1948 for his dystopian novel, 1984". [America's Tragic Descent into Empire, July 9, 2010]

From there Engelhardt's readers are tutored in how our fear of attack was obsessively co-opted by our government and its willing military suppliers.

All these authors plausibly describe the spread, like an octopus. of America's presence around the world, in the form of over 700 military bases--most in places where our security clearly wasn't then and/or is not now at stake.

In retrospect our forays into Korea, Vietnam and now in the Middle East, proved that war was not the answer. The cost in human lives and treasure and the escalating threat of terrorism cry out for a new evaluation of our present imperial policies, But they have been embraced by all Presidents since WWII--including Obama, who has now bought into Bush's ultimate folly, continuing that "preventive war" in Iraq with no real end to our occupancy there and around the world in sight. For example, we have built our largest overseas embassy in Bagdad and have other large permanent military facilities in Iraq.

As in Vietnam, these authors predict the US will eventually come to the point of withdrawal, after the loss of hundreds of lost lives on both sides later and trillions in wasted money. Johnson predicts bankruptcy if we do not. In fairness, all Obama's predecessors since WWII have folded to the wishes of the powerful military-industrial complex, about which President Eisenhower warned us in 1961.

Of these three, it is my view that Chalmers Johnson's Dismantling The Empire: America's Last Best Hope represents the best overview of how we got where we are.

His most dramatic recommendation--do away with the CIA--may never get traction, but his section on "The Legacy of the OSS" (the OSS was shut down in September 1945 and the Central Intelligence Agency started in 1947) should be enough to persuade most readers that our government should hasten to shut down this incompetent agency, which has been allowed total secrecy on how it has wasted our tax dollars (between $44 and $48 billion a year) and covered up dangerous and outrageous initiatives after they have failed. (Johnson's analysis of "Charley Wilson's War" should be mandatory reading for all Americans.)

Yes, we lost 3000 lives on 9/11, plus over 4,000 men and women in the current wars. But we killed three million in Vietnam, then hundreds of thousands in Cambodia and now hundreds of thousands in the Afghanistan and Iraq Wars, including many women and children.

Our Cold War motivations may have had some validity at an earlier time. But the alleged threats that prompted our military escalations clearly need reassessment now.

Looking back on the recent dreary ninth Anniversary of 9/11, and at the decades of bad policies which preceded that "blowback" (a term from a 1953 CIA report updated by Chalmers Johnson), we are reminded of what Pogo said long ago: "We have met the enemy and he is us."
14 of 15 people found the following review helpful
An essential message, diluted by snakes' legs 23 Sept. 2010
By K. F. Laux - Published on Amazon.com
Format: Hardcover
I would have given this 5/5 for the timeliness and importance of the authors' message, and the data he marshalls to make his case, but Johnson has a proclivity for digressions (what the Japanese call "snakes' legs"--unnecessary appendages) which distract the reader and do not benefit his exposition. But perhaps that's to be expected, as this book actually consists of a collection of articles, all from the last decade.

In a nutshell: America must emulate the British, lose its empire and shed its enormous military systems, or equivalently, find a way to overpower and discard the military-industrial complex. The chapters serving to make this case are all must-reads.
Were these reviews helpful? Let us know