The more things change, the more they stay the same. This novel came out in 1963, back in the Stone Age. But women still face the same dilemmas.
Sarah has just graduated, and is very pretty. She's also rather crude, insensitive and self-centred. Well, that all makes for a good "unreliable narrator". We see everything through her eyes, we don't have to take it for gospel truth. Also her snobbery means that her observations of people and the world are funny and perceptive.
Sarah feels she is just drifting through life. She has got a first at Oxford - that's got to be the best you can win in life, surely? But she leaves Oxford, gets a tedious job in a low level of the BBC, and shares a flat with an old friend. She's depressed by the domestic details of life, washing up, opening tins. Her boyfriend is in America and she's not sure their relationship will survive. She doesn't feel any guilt about brief affairs with other men. She sometimes thinks that she will marry the boyfriend and this will solve everything.
She feels very lonely, and hates going to parties on her own. This isn't what modern women are supposed to feel, but she does. All her education seems to have brought her hard work at a meaningless job, and just enough to live on. She has no other plans for the future. Surely things would be different for her now?
In 1963, society had provided higher education for women (a far smaller proportion than now), but hadn't really thought what to do with them afterwards. Sarah hadn't thought about it either. She was good at having intense conversations about films and books, but had no idea of what kind of career she wanted. And of course back then there were fewer opportunities for women. She seems vaguely affronted that she has to work at all. She's shocked that her sister has married for money - "I don't know anyone who marries for money!". She thinks having babies is "awful".
She's never taken the long view. She's not alone. Are things any better now?