An acknowledgement at the back of this book tells us that it was written as part of a PhD course in creative writing at Goldsmith's College. Did Emma Darwin get her doctorate, I wonder? Because, although she can obviously write, I wouldn't say that this is a success at all: in trying to juggle too many balls in the air at the same time she's managed to drop them all.
Perhaps her decision to choose a familiar story like the princes in the tower was her first mistake. Such a well-worn tale calls for a whole new twist or focus, but to avid readers of historical novels, like myself, all she's done is something very familiar - written parallel stories in both past and present - and she hasn't made a very good job of it.
However, she's attempted three narratives instead of the usual two: firstly there's Una, a present-day researcher visiting her old home to sort out some family business. Then in the 15th century there's Anthony Woodville, who re-lives his past on his journey to his execution at Pontefract Castle, and his sister Elizabeth, who tells the story of her marriage to Edward IV through to the death of her sons.
The historical sections are by far the best, especially those dealing with Anthony: he's the most convincing and interesting character and the decision to tell his story in flashback over the course of one day is a good one. But when it's intertwined with Elizabeth's narrative the timelines get hopelessly muddled, and some of the dates are actually wrong. Choosing to head chapters with things like 'the 31st yr of the reign of King Edward the Sixth' instead of the actual date doesn't help - it's not clever, it's obtuse and annoying. As is sometimes referring to the Woodvilles as the 'Wydvils'- so she's read some primary sources, so what? I'd have been more impressed if she'd tried to clarify the complicated politics and family connections of the Wars of the Roses instead. It's all explained in a 'Historical Note' at the end, but by then it's too late: readers coming to this book with little or no knowledge of this period in English history would have to read this first, instead of last, to understand what's going on.
The themes and historical parallels are all over the place too. Books and printing are the link, I suppose, with Una researching into the Woodvilles as collectors of books and patrons of printers, but it's not explored. Ms Darwin is obviously trying to say something about the perils of restoration and recreating the past, but what, apart from the blindingly obvious?
Where was the editor? I'd have thrown the whole thing back at her and told her to get some focus, think about structure, and ditch the modern sections altogether. Una is such a dull creation, there's no drama in the story about saving the printing press, and and her love affair with the mysterious (and also rather dull) Mark is very Mills & Boon, with poor dialogue and a very cheesy ending.
For a far better version of this story, try Sharon Penman's
The Sunne in Splendour. Or for a much more successful attempt at a book with parallel stories in past and present, maybe Anya Seton's
Green Darkness. And even Barbara Erskine's time-hopping gothic romances work better than this.
Very disappointing.