WELSH WOMAN TAKES ON DEATH AND WINS (ALMOST)
I am honoured to be the first to notice this book on-line. It's an extraordinary cry of rage against death, an argument with death even, and by extension a seething, pullulating paean to life (in all its forms) composed along Virgilian/Dantesque lines, with more than a hint (to me) in its manic intensity of Frank Kuppner - not that I'm suggesting the Welshwoman has necessarily ever read the canny Glaswegian! Apart from being a surprisingly rollicking read, given its subject-matter, it is also densely argued. 'Humans! Always..so..anthropocentric', 'A hive is an endless conversation/of life with itself', 'We're born to catastrophe' - but 'compared to the body, the soul is cold'. Neither my best friend nor my worst enemy would ever accuse me of being a dog-lover, but I found the passage devoted to dogs heart-rending. Do I hear an echo of Villon? Perhaps Lewis might consider putting him into Welsh... The Japanese(?) spider is also captivating (it is after all the spider's métier); it all adds up to a kind of grotesque mock-epic, a philosophical burlesque, a medieval graphic-novel-sans-pix which conveys, I feel, better than any more sober account the horror of disease, while being utterly life-affirming.
The Christian world perversely reveled in the Dance of Death for nigh on two millenia; we embattled post-Christians choose to celebrate that fragile miracle (miraculous in a way no mere god could conceive), life; for Lewis, what in the past would have been an impassioned plea to her impassive - because, as is now evident, inexistent - creator narrowly on behalf of self or loved one (because, with eternity in mind, Christians were predisposed to keep self uppermost) becomes the author's desperate negociation with disease itself - the very struggle by which life OF ALL KINDS extends and perpetuates itself; for disease too is a form of life, though parasitical (as if we weren't!!). Lewis's grief thus extends, if I read her right, to all creation.
Apart from the naff Thornton Wilder epigraph fronting Book 10 there is no hint of the spiritual (a word I always view with grave suspicion when not applied to a specific faith/dogma; being 'spiritual' is not a dogma, it is a woozy state between dogmas); in fact on the whole I feel the poem could usefully lose all the epigraphs, with their faintly new-agey, multicultural feel (there are not multicultures, there is Culture) which seems at odds with the earthy, almost ribald flavour of the piece. In fact I may have misrepresented it - think of it not as philosophy or epic but more as a trip to a fairground (rickety ghost train, fun house, big dipper) and enjoy the thrills and (inevitable) spills. Like such a place the poet tells us that while life has no meaning (or its meaning is in its meaninglessness) it is nonetheless important (or it is important that we think it so). Of course, work of this calibre both DOES have meaning and demonstrates man's (relative) importance (unlike a microbe, man sometimes progresses) but then what are we made up of but microorganisms, so I guess all creation should take the credit! Thanks anyway, Gwyneth - and why isn't this a PBS selection?
Postscript 11 months on: wot, still no more British reviews? Maybe it's the subject-matter. Come on, we all gotta die - get used to it! Ans while we're on the subject (death I can handle - it's the NHS-as-underworld that spooks me!) read the diary column in the LRB of 4/11/10; it's flagged on the cover 'Hilary Mantel meets the Devil'. I have absolutely no desire to read anything else she's written (why read novels when there's Proust?) - but read this, I urge you. And please review Gwyneth. And take care crossing roads.