Micklethwait and Wooldridge make the point that globalisation suffers just as much from its boosters as it does from its detractors. It will not produce "a future perfect" - just a future very much better than any of the available alternatives. Only yesterday the best defence of globalisation that a WTO spokesman could offer in a radio interview was "it's probably inevitable". I hope he is right, but this book argues that far from being inevitable, globalisation is actually very fragile and needs defending and arguing for in terms that ordinary people can understand. The trouble is that those who benefit from it tend to credit their own hard work and talent while those who loose out are happy to blame globalisation.
The book is also wonderfully well written. It considers seriously and sympathetically the plight of those whose who can be said to have lost out through globalisation. It presents the arguments of the detractors of globalisation fairly and then demolishes them robustly. It has a nicely judged, wry sense of humour ("[John Maynard] Keynes did admit to having a 'deeply spiritual' lunch with Beatrice [Webb] in 1913, but he did not repeat the experience until 1926.") It recognises that economics are not everything: globalisation does increase efficiency and thereby boosts growth making us richer, but more importantly it also increases individual freedom (of most whom it is allowed to reach, not just the elites) making us happier.
Buy this book, read it and join the debate - the barbarian tribes are gathering and it may soon be too late.