How do you make history interesting? TV programme "Time Team" is one brilliant format but a book can't easily reproduce the challenging enthusiasm of Tony Robinson. Some authors tell it straight but rely on the quality of their writing to get them through - Robin Lane Fox, Michael Wood and Tom Holland "Crossing the Rubicon" are examples. Having browsed their efforts in bookshops I just couldn't imagine wading through 400+ pages of the stuff.
The format here is very different - the book is written as a modern translation of a Byzantine scholar writing a guide-book to Britain in 500AD. Hearing it from a scholar doesn't sound very promising so the author does several things to keep it your interest.
First, he gives the scholar a gossipy and arrogant character - this can grate a bit (he is a tremendous snob) but it injects lots of colour and makes the text very easy to read.
Second, the scholar bases his guide-book in part on the report of an expedition from his country that visited Britain 20 years before - they tour round gathering information and getting into all sorts of scrapes, many of which involved in the death of one of them in various ways. This is great device because it allows for first-hand accounts of different events.
Third, Stephen Young, the "true" author, contains his knowledge within the writing and only occasionally feels the need to back this up with a footnote that refers to a book or article.
At times he stands accused of trying bit too hard to popularise the subject going for the quirky when the commonplace would be more interesting (e.g. the habit of offering guests your nipple to suck when we would shake hands is highlighted again and again and again, but we don't find out much about what people had to eat).
Each chapter covers an area of Britain and within this there are around four specific places the expedition visited. There's a real selection, from palaces to villages and my personal favourites, the ruins of Roman fortresses and towns. This breaks up the text a bit but it makes it very good for reading in a train or underground where stations do not always conveniently coincide with chapter endings.
Probably the weakest aspect is that the expedition never become more than nameless people until they die (if you ever saw the original Star Trek on TV you will understand what I mean by red-shirted cannon-fodder, the character introduced for one episode to die in some unpleasant way). The expedition do not feature as characters to any extent so this is an annoyance rather than a problem and it shouldn't mar your enjoyment.
Overall, this was an informative book written in a really enjoyable and entertaining way. The author is trying lots of things to keep the material interesting and some of them don't quite work this is such a fresh and energetic way to tell history that I really look forward to his next book. Very, very good.