Sort: Oldest first | Newest first
Showing 1-2 of 2 posts in this discussion
Initial post: 12 Apr 2010 14:13:41 BDT
Can anyone help me with this decision? Which one to buy, the Forerunner 305 or the FR60.
I am a female jogger who is training for my first marathon, though I regularly do 10-12 mile jogs. I've only ever used a Polar F6, mainly because I like that it tells me how many calories I've used. I now, however, want a watch that does everything that these two watches do. I get that the main difference is the GPS (305) versus the footpod (FR60). From reviews, both seem to measure accurate distance.
Can anyone tell me if the Forerunner 305 accurately measures calorie use?
ta.

In reply to an earlier post on 19 May 2010 09:17:43 BDT
Rich says:
the 305 doesn't use heart rate / weight etc to calculate calorie consumption and it's estimate is shockingly awful - for cycling it's about a factor of 10 too high.
‹ Previous 1 Next ›
[Add comment]
Add your own message to the discussion
To insert a product link use the format: [[ASIN:ASIN product-title]] (What's this?)
Prompts for sign-in
 


ARRAY(0xadf7dcf0)
 

This discussion

Participants:  2
Total posts:  2
Initial post:  12 Apr 2010
Latest post:  19 May 2010

New! Receive e-mail when new posts are made.
Tracked by 1 customer

Search Customer Discussions