Don Breithaupt, Aja (Continuum, 2007)
I've been hearing about Continuum's 33 1/3 series of books for years now, and I decided that if I was going to get into the series, I might as well start with a book based on one of the greatest albums of all time, Steely Dan's 1978 smash Aja. I should say when writing this that I've been a musician on the practical side since the early eighties, and was also on the theoretical side briefly in the late eighties, so I do have some basic idea of how you put a song together, and I had a little training in music theory (a couple of semesters' worth). I could make heads and/or tails of about half this book. Worse, Breithaupt's "comprehensive" glossary is anything but, unless he assumes that people who have even less musical knowledge than I will understand such sentences as this: "The animus behind the verse in 'Peg' is this: for each of the standard three chords of a twelve-bar blues (tonic, subdominant and dominant [sic]), substitute a plagal cadence...". Plagal? Umm, what? And this is before he starts getting technical.
When you're reading the parts that actually sound like English, Breithaupt's thesis is a simple one: Steely Dan, and especially the Steely Dan that released Aja (and Gaucho as well), was very much a product of its time, something that could have come neither before (when rock had not advanced to a point where rock bands were willing to react against it) or after (the eighties, when FM radio fragmented the market irrevocably). All well and good, and even Steely Dan's harshest critics (though they're probably thankful) would find it impossible to argue that Aja is unique in the world of rock and roll; nothing else sounds like it, nothing else sounds even remotely like it. Okay, I'm along for the ride there. I'm certainly down with the concept of Breithaupt trying to explain why the record is unique; the problem is that only the deepest-involved of theory geeks is going to get some of this stuff. (Granted, if you're willing to take everything he says at face value, you can float along, and you'll pick some of the basics up through context.) I also, though this will be a personal preference for most readers, wonder why Breithaupt persists in avoiding the easiest interpretation of any given lyric. He mentions, at one point, seven different possible answers to the question "What is 'Aja' about?" (not counting his own, "about eight minutes"). None of them addresses the obvious idea that it's simply a creative misspelling ("Chinese music under banyan trees", quoted earlier in the book, notwithstanding). I'm not saying that's the right interpretation (I am of the school that believes any interpretation a reader/listener comes up with that can be backed up with textual evidence is valid), I'm just saying it's the most obvious, and it's entirely ignored. The same thing happens with "Deacon Blues" (come on, are you seriously going to tell me this song is not, at least in part, an elegy?).
Not a bad book, but seriously over-technical. Hoping the other books in the series approach their albums from a different angle. ***